The "REAL" Fade Brandon Lang Thread

[phelps123]

finman there was definitely a foul on the endzone during the hail mary right?

 

[seth]

Packers (+6) 27-19 Outright over Chiefs

you don't get paid more if they win outright and you bet them on the handicap so it's irrelevant

I'm guessing lang doesn't write this? There must be ssomeone updating the website with the cherry picking propaganda every day

 

[RidgeRider]

No Lang wrote it. Buden, Rolli / Demarco and the website guy who lives in Atlanta write for all the other handicappers.

 

[theangryhog]

December Tracking: through 12/3
$10 fader up $1,150.00
Total Fader Risked amount: $3,575.00
ROI: (Will do when we have more data)

 

[finman13]

Yep, pass interference but I'll take the break.
Chiefs were totally outplayed anyway and deserved to lose.

 

[finman13]

So Noone has beat the shit out of Anson Munson yet? Or he has been offed and they keep the photo up? Or, they paid some idiot for his photo?

 

[RidgeRider]

I'm pretty sure they pay a yearly fee to the idiots who allow their photo to be used with a made up name. It's not against any law as far as I know of. Unethical, yea for sure. I'd have to speak to an attorney to see if they broke any law. Can any attorney who reads this comment on the use of pictures of people that aren't actually that person? I'm guessing every fictitious name must be registered with the state in which the company is registered. Whether the company does that is yet to be determined. If memory serves me correct. A company in Canada bought the BrandonLang.com website as well as all the others from Budin & Rolli/ Demarco a few years ago. Not sure what laws Canadian companies have to abide by in the United States.

 

[savage1]

I'm pretty sure they pay a yearly fee to the idiots who allow their photo to be used with a made up name. It's not against any law as far as I know of. Unethical, yea for sure. I'd have to speak to an attorney to see if they broke any law. Can any attorney who reads this comment on the use of pictures of people that aren't actually that person? I'm guessing every fictitious name must be registered with the state in which the company is registered. Whether the company does that is yet to be determined. If memory serves me correct. A company in Canada bought the BrandonLang.com website as well as all the others from Budin & Rolli/ Demarco a few years ago. Not sure what laws Canadian companies have to abide by in the United States.

I am not an attorney but my own sense is that nothing can be done in the way of a lawsuit could be filed in an instance like this for

the simple reason that the product being marketed namely sports picks is not tangible in the same sense as say marketing

tv's, automobiles, and household products meaning that if they are defective/don't win, there is not anyone you can lay the blame on

in the first place perhaps about lying about their record, which imo is a pretty iffy proposition on its own!!

Couple that with the fact that a lot of handicappers don't disclose their real names in the first place and just have a name for the service

which doesn't include the owner or names of the cappers who make the picks whether they are real or made-up, and you have a dicey

situation.

On the other hand, if a made-up capper on a site offered a money-back guarantee on a pick or picks and didn't live up to it

if the plays lost, a person who purchased the plays might have a better case to sue although even though I am not so sure

that it would go anywhere for the simple reason that sports services still have a stigma of "Buyer beware" attached to them,

which by implication puts the burden on the purchaser of the picks on the buyer rather than the handicapper or service

which sells this!!

That is my $.02 in any event,

 

[steve021]

The Pick: My 60 Dime winner is the Jacksonville Jaguars.



The Line: The current line is -10 in Vegas and offshore as of 12:35 pm EST. Be sure to shop around for the best line available.



My Analysis

This is a destruction.



The Pittsburgh Steelers, arguably one of the ugliest offenses we have seen in NFL history, put up over 400 yards total offense on this Bengals defense last week.



I'm talking about one of the sorriest offenses in the NFL!!!! Over 400 yards on you!!!! What a joke.



What do you think this Jags offense is going to do?????



Seriously, do you think Cincinnati is going to find new players this week? Do you think they all of a sudden drank a magic drink and they are going to play defense??



Sorry folks, it's just hot happening.



Not as good as the Jags are playing right now, coming off the 3-point win at Houston, after the 20 point home blowout of the Titans.



Now the Jags get a Bengals team with a back up QB Jake Browning and we found out last week he is no Joe Burrow.



On the road, in this stadium, with this crowd, under the Monday night lights, you can't possibly bet on Browning.



I don't care what the number is.



If that isn't enough, how about the Bengals in the primetime night slot.



They have lost 15 straight prime time games on the road and 26 of 27 night road games.



Money wise, they are 1-8 ATS last 9 on the Monday night road.



Lay it with confidence tonight as the Jags roll and roll big by at least 3 touchdowns.



In the words of Dickie V, Blowout city baby. Blowout city.

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LOSER LANG 2023 BANKROLL
NEGATIVE 2,506.75 DIMES

LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $25,067.5 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks = -$27,062.5)

PAID PICKS: 157-167-3 / 48.4%

-Lang by Month-
DEC 2022: 11-19-1, -1,462 DIMES
JAN: 18-12, +252.5 DIMES
FEB: 13-16, -492.5 DIMES
MAR: 13-17-1, -547 DIMES
APR: 11-18-1, -599 DIMES
MAY: 16-14, -163.5 DIMES
JUN: 14-16, -92.5 DIMES
JUL: 9-17, -656 DIMES
AUG: 19-11, +627.75 DIMES
SEP: 16-13, +91 DIMES
OCT: 15-16, -92.5 DIMES
NOV: 13-16-1, -667.5 DIMES
DEC: 1-2, -147.5 DIMES

-Lang by Week-
WEEK 00: 12/27 to 1/2, (1W-5L) -671.5 DIMES (1W-0L +75 Dimes from 1/1 to 1/2)
WEEK 01: 1/3 to 1/9, (5W-2L) +25 DIMES
WEEK 02: 1/10 to 1/16, (5W-2L) +292.5 DIMES
WEEK 03: 1/17 to 1/23, (3W-4L) -163 DIMES
WEEK 04: 1/24 to 1/30, (3W-4L) -17 DIMES
WEEK 05: 1/31 to 2/6, (3W-4L) -198 DIMES
WEEK 06: 2/7 to 2/13, (4W-4L) -224 DIMES
WEEK 07: 2/14 to 2/20, (3W-4L) -113.5 DIMES
WEEK 08: 2/21 to 2/27, (3W-4L) +53 DIMES
WEEK 09: 2/28 to 3/6, (3W-3L-1P) -185 DIMES
WEEK 10: 3/7 to 3/13, (5W-2L) +156 DIMES
WEEK 11: 3/14 to 3/20, (2W-5L) -293.5 DIMES
WEEK 12: 3/21 to 3/27, (4W-3L) +64 DIMES
WEEK 13: 3/28 to 4/3, (1W-6L) -311.5 DIMES
WEEK 14: 4/4 to 4/10, (2W-4L-1P) -59 DIMES
WEEK 15: 4/11 to 4/17, (3W-4L) -198.5 DIMES
WEEK 16: 4/18 to 4/24, (3W-4L) -71.5 DIMES
WEEK 17: 4/25 to 5/1, (3W-4L) -177 DIMES
WEEK 18: 5/2 to 5/8, (5W-2L) +237.5 DIMES
WEEK 19: 5/9 to 5/15, (5W-2L) +358 DIMES
WEEK 20: 5/16 to 5/22, (3W-4L) -200 DIMES
WEEK 21: 5/23 to 5/29, (2W-4L) -499 DIMES
WEEK 22: 5/30 to 6/5, (3W-4L) +118 DIMES
WEEK 23: 6/6 to 6/12, (4W-3L) -20 DIMES
WEEK 24: 6/13 to 6/19, (3W-4L) +74 DIMES
WEEK 25: 6/20 to 6/26, (2W-5L) -297 DIMES
WEEK 26: 6/27 to 7/3, (4W-3L) +40 DIMES
WEEK 27: 7/4 to 7/10, (1W-5L) -286 DIMES
WEEK 28: 7/11 to 7/17, (2W-2L) -30 DIMES
WEEK 29: 7/18 to 7/24, (2W-4L) -97 DIMES
WEEK 30: 7/25 to 7/31, (2W-5L) -345.5 DIMES
WEEK 31: 8/1 to 8/7, (4W-2L) +172.75 DIMES
WEEK 32: 8/8 to 8/14, (6W-1L) +527.5 DIMES
WEEK 33: 8/15 to 8/21, (3W-4L) -215 DIMES
WEEK 34: 8/22 to 8/28, (3W-4L) -132.5 DIMES
WEEK 35: 8/29 to 9/4, (5W-2L) +222.5 DIMES
WEEK 36: 9/5 to 9/11, (4W-3L) +115 DIMES
WEEK 37: 9/12 to 9/18, (4W-3L) +85 DIMES
WEEK 38: 9/19 to 9/25, (4W-3L) +87.5 DIMES
WEEK 39: 9/26 to 10/2, (3W-3L) -149 DIMES
WEEK 40: 10/3 to 10/9, (5W-2L) +377.5 DIMES
WEEK 41: 10/10 to 10/16, (2W-5L) -270 DIMES
WEEK 42: 10/17 to 10/23, (1W-6L) -565 DIMES
WEEK 43: 10/24 to 10/30, (4W-2L) +220 DIMES
WEEK 44: 10/31 to 11/6, (4W-3L) +226 DIMES
WEEK 45: 11/7 to 11/13, (4W-3L) +66.5 DIMES
WEEK 46: 11/14 to 11/20, (2W-5L) -538.5 DIMES
WEEK 47: 11/21 to 11/27, (2W-4L-1P) -346.5 DIMES
WEEK 48: 11/28 to 12/4, (3W-3L) -122.5 DIMES

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LOSER LANG TRACKER (IN-SEASON SPORTS)

NFL PRE-SEASON (2023-'24)

2-4, -240 Dimes

DIME RATINGS

100 DIME: 0-1
75 DIME: 1-2
60 DIME: 0-1
50 DIME: 1-0

NFL REGULAR SEASON (2023-'24)

17-17-1, -245 Dimes

DIME RATINGS

200 DIME: 3-1
150 DIME: 0-1
100 DIME: 3-8-1
80 DIME: 2-0
75 DIME: 5-4
60 DIME: 2-0
50 DIME: 2-3

COLLEGE FOOTBALL REGULAR SEASON (2023-'24)

23-20, -245.5 Dimes

DIME RATINGS

200 DIME: 1-4
150 DIME: 6-2
100 DIME: 3-1
80 DIME: 2-2
75 DIME: 6-9
60 DIME: 1-0
50 DIME: 2-2
40 DIME: 2-0

COLLEGE HOOPS REGULAR SEASON (2023-'24)

2-4, -123.5 Dimes

DIME RATINGS

75 DIME: 1-1
60 DIME: 1-2
40 DIME: 0-1

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LOSER LANG 10+ YEAR RECORD TRACKER
1/01/2013 up to NOW!!!

NEGATIVE 11,360.25 DIMES

LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $113,602.5 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks x11 = -$135,547.5)

-Lang Past 10+ Years-
2023: NEGATIVE 2,506.75 DIMES (01/01/23 to 12/03/23)
2022: NEGATIVE 1,586.5 DIMES
2021: NEGATIVE 1,524.5 DIMES
2020: POSITIVE* 402.5 DIMES (*NOT A FULL YEAR DUE TO COVID)
2019: NEGATIVE 761.75 DIMES
2018: NEGATIVE 738 DIMES
2017: NEGATIVE 499.5 DIMES
2016: NEGATIVE 2,941.5 DIMES
2015: NEGATIVE 181 DIMES
2014: NEGATIVE 113.75 DIMES
2013: NEGATIVE 929 DIMES

9/01/2007 to 4/16/2010: NEGATIVE** 3,245.7 DIMES (**AS DOCUMENTED BY AL DEMARCO) (NOT INCLUDED IN ABOVE RECORD)

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LANG'S DART THROW: JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS -10

A winning streak starts with 1 winner. Nothing more. Nothing less.
And that is what I did on Sunday with the 100 dime winner on the Packers outright over the Chiefs, just like I said they would.
But trust me, the week could have been HUGE.
Nice 3-0 start with the 60 dime winner Monday on the Bears, the 60 dime winner Tuesday on Syracuse and the 75 dime winner Wednesday with Tar Heels.
Then came the loss on the pathetic Cowboys defense on Thursday which resulted in the 100 dime loss.
Then came the horrific INT in the end zone in the 4th quarter by New Mexico State in the 75 dime loss.
Then came the embarrassing Kirby Smart and his Bulldogs no show against Bama on Saturday and the 150 dime loss.
Just like that the 3 day winning streak followed by a 3-day losing strreak.
Yes, it was nice to get the 100 dime winner outright on Green Bay (+6) over the Chiefs 27-19 but it could have been much more if not for that 3-day run.
Unfu@$#$king believable.
Time to keep the momentum right here with a 2nd straight winner and 3rd straight 60 dime winner.
Let's just get another winner on the board tonight.

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

Well Lang finally cut down his Tale of the Tape to just the past 3 games to hide all the losing.
I had to break out the splicer to show the current losing week of his, lol.

Lang trying to include this past Monday game into his week to make it seem like he did great but just had a few bad breaks. We all know his week runs from Tuesday-Monday and even if you did include his last Monday game he'd still have had a losing week.
He's such a clown and obviously very bad at math.
And this is why he hides all the losing. So if somebody new shows up to his website they think he's doing great and purchases his shit opinion.
Fuck you Brandon Link!

 

[phillyeagles1975]

LANG'S DART THROW: JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS -10

A winning streak starts with 1 winner. Nothing more. Nothing less.
And that is what I did on Sunday with the 100 dime winner on the Packers outright over the Chiefs, just like I said they would.
But trust me, the week could have been HUGE.
Nice 3-0 start with the 60 dime winner Monday on the Bears, the 60 dime winner Tuesday on Syracuse and the 75 dime winner Wednesday with Tar Heels.
Then came the loss on the pathetic Cowboys defense on Thursday which resulted in the 100 dime loss.
Then came the horrific INT in the end zone in the 4th quarter by New Mexico State in the 75 dime loss.
Then came the embarrassing Kirby Smart and his Bulldogs no show against Bama on Saturday and the 150 dime loss.
Just like that the 3 day winning streak followed by a 3-day losing strreak.
Yes, it was nice to get the 100 dime winner outright on Green Bay (+6) over the Chiefs 27-19 but it could have been much more if not for that 3-day run.
Unfu@$#$king believable.
Time to keep the momentum right here with a 2nd straight winner and 3rd straight 60 dime winner.
Let's just get another winner on the board tonight.

“Lang’s dart throw” … priceless. Good chuckle.

 

[savage1]

The Pick: My 60 Dime winner is the Jacksonville Jaguars.



The Line: The current line is -10 in Vegas and offshore as of 12:35 pm EST. Be sure to shop around for the best line available.



My Analysis

This is a destruction.

It is piling on "destruction" when it comes to you as a handicapper who is lucky if he can "pick" his nose let alone ats winners!!

The Pittsburgh Steelers, arguably one of the ugliest offenses we have seen in NFL history, put up over 400 yards total offense on this Bengals defense last week.

So what the fu k does that prove?? If your sophomoric logic and reasoning like this worked over time, your

clients(if you have any) wouldn't be totally buried!!).

I'm talking about one of the sorriest offenses in the NFL!!!! Over 400 yards on you!!!! What a joke.

How did that work out for you tonight??

What do you think this Jags offense is going to do?????

The question should have been What do you think the Cincy offense is going to do??

Seriously, do you think Cincinnati is going to find new players this week? Do you think they all of a sudden drank a magic drink and they are going to play defense??

Begging the question and poisoning the well as you just did rarely works including tonight!!

Sorry folks, it's just hot happening.

It did happen and once again it simply shows what an arrogant/incompetent/lying LOSER you are!!

Not as good as the Jags are playing right now, coming off the 3-point win at Houston, after the 20 point home blowout of the Titans.

As as is almost always the case you are a day earlier or a day late with your analysis!!

Now the Jags get a Bengals team with a back up QB Jake Browning and we found out last week he is no Joe Burrow.

Hmm-how about telling us how he did tonight!!

On the road, in this stadium, with this crowd, under the Monday night lights, you can't possibly bet on Browning.

People like yourself who rely and bet on gut feelings only can't bet on him that's for sure!!

I don't care what the number is.

Of course you don't-that;s one big reason that you have buried people over the years who were dumb enough to follow you

and/or were/are masochists!!

If that isn't enough, how about the Bengals in the primetime night slot.

How about it!!

They have lost 15 straight prime time games on the road and 26 of 27 night road games.

You stupid fu k-does losing all of the games you cite mean that they can't cover a 10-point line while still losing the game!!

Money wise, they are 1-8 ATS last 9 on the Monday night road.

In how many of those games were they a ten-point dog or more dog-doesn't that count for something!!

Lay it with confidence tonight as the Jags roll and roll big by at least 3 touchdowns.

Three touchdowns you say-how about losing the game straight up!!

In the words of Dickie V, Blowout city baby. Blowout city.

The appropriate words are not from "Blowout city" from Dickie V but rather "Blow me, Lang," in anger from anyone stupid enough to

follow and plays your games or in delight from a fader who plays the game and as usual wins!!

 

[phelps123]

savage, home favourites of 7 or more is only 12-21-1 ATS on MNF before tonight's game. That is the record that Lang should have used instead of the generic Bengals 1-8 ATS record.

 

[savage1]

In addition to what i just said in the previous post, as an experienced sports gambler for over 50 years, I learned painfully a while back

that a lot more times than not that when there are overwhelming trends why team A should cover and overwhelming trends

why B SHOULDN'T cover and the the overwhelming number of people who bet including sports services are on team A, the best

course of action is play Team B or at the very least pass if you like Team A also.

For lack of a better way to put it, it I would compare it to two bulls locking horns facing horns facing one another!!

 

[sniperpicks]

Out right

 

[savage1]

savage, home favourites of 7 or more is only 12-21-1 ATS on MNF before tonight's game. That is the record that Lang should have used instead of the generic Bengals 1-8 ATS record.

Phelps-Incompetent cappers like Lang only consider what they want to and leave important stuff out like you just cited that calls into

question the other one-way trend they use to support their pick!!

Thanks for posting the great trend you cited!!