The official JustinCruise/Greenbacks ban bet tracker

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,406
Tokens
Oh I do think it is better to just say "Fuck it, I'm not complying with your ban" rather than create a 2nd account. That's a whole different level of sad.

Atleast he is saying "I'm Greenbacks, I'm not going to comply, nobody is gonna do shit"

He certainly isn't trying to deceive anyone. If you're so serious about those things being virtues to you, then how do you feel about the people enabling behavior contrary to that? Because it sounds like they don't really care all that much. Maybe you should ask them to think it over?


it is his lifes work and greatest accomplishment gathering those 90000 post in less then 3 years.
a person like him it would not do him much good starting a ghost.
greenbacks is his identity .
its his life.
the 90000 post is the most important thing in his life.

its what he does.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
I think letting him post is ok. Now everyone knows what I already knew to be true about him. It wont be so easy for him to toss around insults now that everyone knows he's scumbag.

Yeah, he's gonna be a saint now. I'm sure he will turn over a new leaf. No more senseless name calling and acting like a total moron.

People will make fun of him now, but in a few weeks, a month, etc no one is going to waste their time constantly chiding GB for being a stiff and things will be back to normal. And as dumb as he is, even he knows that.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
17,707
Tokens
it is his lifes work and greatest accomplishment gathering those 90000 post in less then 3 years.
a person like him it would not do him much good starting a ghost.
greenbacks is his identity .
its his life.
the 90000 post is the most important thing in his life.

its what he does.



Hes a man that claims to be proud of his Italian heritage. Even hints that it’s superior to others. I doubt anyone would want to claim a person who cannot honor his word. Threatens others. He’s a rat. He’s a dead beat. He lacks honor and personal accountability.

i wish he held his reputation to the same level he holds his loyalty to a gambling forum where he is unwelcome.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
15,087
Tokens
The RXForum should be really, really proud of this thread.

Who gives a "Royal Waste of time SHIT" about these two jirkoffs?

I don't...betting most posters here could give a rats ass!
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,397
Tokens
The RXForum should be really, really proud of this thread.

Who gives a "Royal Waste of time SHIT" about these two jirkoffs?

I don't...betting most posters here could give a rats ass!
especially when the geezer didn't even honor his ban for a week, let alone two years

epic waste of brain cells in these 27 pages
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,397
Tokens
how perfect is this gif? :)

seinfeldjoebanned.gif
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,218
Tokens
It's already been said that neither poster has honored a ban-bet.

When you honestly break it down, how long each waited to post is irrelevant.

In my opinion that makes it a wash.

If one got a pass, so should the other.

Neither is any worse or better than the other.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
It's already been said that neither poster has honored a ban-bet.

When you honestly break it down, how long each waited to post is irrelevant.

In my opinion that makes it a wash.

If one got a pass, so should the other.

Neither is any worse or better than the other.

One guy went 10 months. The other 15 hours. One reached out to broker a deal with the guy he lost to in order to come back. One didn't.

The two situations aren't remotely the same but carry on.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
One guy went 10 months. The other 15 hours. One reached out to broker a deal with the guy he lost to in order to come back. One didn't.

The two situations aren't remotely the same but carry on.

Cruise made like 6-7 posts in the MLB forum at about the 7 month mark. Why would you do that and then go on to honor the bet for another 3 months? Who knows, if you're gonna stiff then you would think someone would just go all out and say fuck it and post all they wanted.

But even then, waiting 8 months is not the same thing as waiting 15 hours and taunting the guy on the site that you aren't respecting the results of the ban bet.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Cruise made like 6-7 posts in the MLB forum at about the 7 month mark. Why would you do that and then go on to honor the bet for another 3 months? Who knows, if you're gonna stiff then you would think someone would just go all out and say fuck it and post all they wanted.

But even then, waiting 8 months is not the same thing as waiting 15 hours and taunting the guy on the site that you aren't respecting the results of the ban bet.

Yes, agree. The situations aren't the same.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
17,707
Tokens
It's already been said that neither poster has honored a ban-bet.

When you honestly break it down, how long each waited to post is irrelevant.

In my opinion that makes it a wash.

If one got a pass, so should the other.

Neither is any worse or better than the other.

Not even comparable...

plus gb made the bet knowing his past. Which he served most of time.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
17,707
Tokens
Cruise made like 6-7 posts in the MLB forum at about the 7 month mark. Why would you do that and then go on to honor the bet for another 3 months? Who knows, if you're gonna stiff then you would think someone would just go all out and say fuck it and post all they wanted.

But even then, waiting 8 months is not the same thing as waiting 15 hours and taunting the guy on the site that you aren't respecting the results of the ban bet.

Exactly. Jc even reached out to find out how he can make it right for ending it early. He mostly respected the process. Greenbacks is giving the middle finger to stiffing jc.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Exactly. Jc even reached out to find out how he can make it right for ending it early. He mostly respected the process. Greenbacks is giving the middle finger to stiffing jc.

He reached out about the MLB forum stuff? I don't think he did.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
17,707
Tokens
He reached out about the MLB forum stuff?

No after. He had to have a cubs WS avatar for the final couple of months. I believe he honored that. JC or HC could chip in with this info. Either way, it’s not even close to the same situation.

Hache always has good intentions, but he’s so off on this one. GB is being blatantly disrespectful. He’s clearly unable to step away from the forum which only emphasizes his instability. He needs to be shown the door.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
I agree with your premise that the situations aren't the same but it is good to put all the facts out there.

He didn't reach out about the MLB forum posts. He just violated the bet 7 months in.

Obviously coming back early in exchange for posting/Cubs avatar is completely fine. That isn't what people are citing when they talk about him violating the ban though...
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,218
Tokens
Some of you guys' thinking is questionable.

I don't care if you took $100 off of my dresser or $500.

You still stole from me.

Yes it's the same analogy because it all relates to credibility, so please don't say it's not a good comparison.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,397
Tokens
Some of you guys' thinking is questionable.

I don't care if you took $100 off of my dresser or $500.

You still stole from me.

Yes it's the same analogy because it all relates to credibility, so please don't say it's not a good comparison.
another terrible analogy...you're racking them up today

trying to compare 7 months, with an agreed-to punishment for return, to 15 hours isn't even playing the same sport let alone on the same field
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,218
Tokens
another terrible analogy...you're racking them up today

trying to compare 7 months, with an agreed-to punishment for return, to 15 hours isn't even playing the same sport let alone on the same field




They both couldn't stay away so what does the time frame matter?

Think guys! (in a friendly, reasonable tone)

Of course the one who stayed away a little longer looks better on paper but in the end they both caved & both lumped in the same category.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,382
Messages
13,532,598
Members
100,365
Latest member
rnorton147
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com