Eh, it was the easiest way to point out the irony in you calling anyone else out for making stupid posts. Scott attempted to have a real conversation about a real world topic and you didn't go near it. My guess would be it's because it's much safer to call people stupid rather than have opinions and discuss issues.
And here I thought we could be budds after I criticized these GOP Senators. Bummer it didn't work out.
But for the fear of "nationwide race riots" this is 100% correct. It is outrageous and infuriating how long this fraud has been allowed to continue to his wrecking ball agenda.
Any 'agreement' with Iran has to be ratified by the Senate. They're just calling a turd a turd. Of course Sen. Menendez did just that publicly and this outlaw regime slapped him with corruption charges.
Waaaaaaaaaa...they're undermining our Nobel Peace Prize fuhrer!
Libtards get mad when their little dictator doesn't get his way.
His reign comes to and end in roughly 18 months. How much more can he possibly do that can’t reversed with a stroke of the pen. I’m more concerned that the voters didn’t learn their lesson.
Hillary vs. Jebediah raises suicidal thoughts in most Conservatives. If that’s the ticket, Conservatives will most likely remain on the sidelines assuring Obama light in the WH.
Which leads me back to pulling a Timothy Leary and going quietly onto the night if that happens.
The responses are so typical of this place. Senators and Congress people are allowed to travel overseas, meet with leaders, etc. Trying to compare that to this is laughable, but of course that's what I would expect with simpletons. That's NOT what this disgraceful, bordering on traitorous letter to Iran was.
Good editorial by the Anti Obama rag. Even though they are against Obama's Policies with Iran, they recognize the serious betrayal these Treasonous Senators undertook.
Un-patriot games: GOP senators' letter to Iran is a treacherous betrayal of the U.S. constitutional system
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Tuesday, March 10, 2015, 12:58 AM
Underhanded undermining
Regardless of President Obama’s fecklessness in negotiating a nuclear deal with Iran, 47 Republican U.S. senators engaged in treachery by sending a letter to the mullahs aimed at cutting the legs out from under America’s commander-in-chief.
We join GOP signatories in opposing the pact as outlined, but we strenuously condemn their betrayal of the U.S. constitutional system.
The participants represented the bulk of the Republicans’ 54-member senatorial majority, vesting their petulant, condescending stunt with the coloration of an institutional foreign policy statement.
They are an embarrassment to the Senate and to the nation.
How the executive and legislative branches come to terms in the event that Obama presents his version of a done deal to America will be of grave national and international concern. There will be no place for juvenilia, and there should not have been at this expectant juncture.
SENATE GOP'S IRAN LETTER SPARKS #47TRAITORS TWITTER TREND
Rather than offer objections domestically in robust debate, as is their obligation, ringleader Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and his band trespassed on presidential turf by patronizing Iran’s leaders with the suggestion “that you may not fully understand our constitutional system.”
A future President, they wrote, “could revoke” any deal not approved by Congress “with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”
All true, and unquestionably not news to Iran’s leaders, who may be murderous zealots, but are by no means morons.
The plain intent was to sabotage Obama by pushing the Iranians into balking at a deal out of fear that a turn of the U.S. political wheel could doom the pact in the not-so-distant future.
Horrendously, every member of the Republican Senate leadership signed the letter, as did GOP presidential contenders Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio. Only seven Republicans showed sense enough not to go along.
The Senate and House have the power to pass judgment on an Obama pact. The two bodies need only to pass legislation claiming the privilege.
The House is set to do so, but the Senate is three votes shy of a veto-proof margin at the moment. Pushing the count over the top will be crucial to subjecting Obama’s handiwork to the considered will of America’s representatives, as is sanctioned by the Constitution.
Quite possibly, Senate Democrats will block review of what would be the most consequential treaty entered by an American President in many a year.
While the Democrats would be grossly wrong to prevent congressional oversight of an agreement that promises to reshape the balance of power in the Middle East and endanger Israel, the process should play out as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, not as executed by faith-breaking frauds
Un-patriot games: GOP senators' letter to Iran is a treacherous betrayal of the U.S. constitutional system
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Tuesday, March 10, 2015, 12:58 AM
Underhanded undermining
Regardless of President Obama’s fecklessness in negotiating a nuclear deal with Iran, 47 Republican U.S. senators engaged in treachery by sending a letter to the mullahs aimed at cutting the legs out from under America’s commander-in-chief.
We join GOP signatories in opposing the pact as outlined, but we strenuously condemn their betrayal of the U.S. constitutional system.
The participants represented the bulk of the Republicans’ 54-member senatorial majority, vesting their petulant, condescending stunt with the coloration of an institutional foreign policy statement.
They are an embarrassment to the Senate and to the nation.
How the executive and legislative branches come to terms in the event that Obama presents his version of a done deal to America will be of grave national and international concern. There will be no place for juvenilia, and there should not have been at this expectant juncture.
SENATE GOP'S IRAN LETTER SPARKS #47TRAITORS TWITTER TREND
Rather than offer objections domestically in robust debate, as is their obligation, ringleader Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and his band trespassed on presidential turf by patronizing Iran’s leaders with the suggestion “that you may not fully understand our constitutional system.”
A future President, they wrote, “could revoke” any deal not approved by Congress “with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”
All true, and unquestionably not news to Iran’s leaders, who may be murderous zealots, but are by no means morons.
The plain intent was to sabotage Obama by pushing the Iranians into balking at a deal out of fear that a turn of the U.S. political wheel could doom the pact in the not-so-distant future.
Horrendously, every member of the Republican Senate leadership signed the letter, as did GOP presidential contenders Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio. Only seven Republicans showed sense enough not to go along.
The Senate and House have the power to pass judgment on an Obama pact. The two bodies need only to pass legislation claiming the privilege.
The House is set to do so, but the Senate is three votes shy of a veto-proof margin at the moment. Pushing the count over the top will be crucial to subjecting Obama’s handiwork to the considered will of America’s representatives, as is sanctioned by the Constitution.
Quite possibly, Senate Democrats will block review of what would be the most consequential treaty entered by an American President in many a year.
While the Democrats would be grossly wrong to prevent congressional oversight of an agreement that promises to reshape the balance of power in the Middle East and endanger Israel, the process should play out as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, not as executed by faith-breaking frauds
