k:
You have no data to back up your statement. Its an assertion.
You're more than welcome to question anything you like. It helps if along with questioning any of my responses, that you actually supply data or facts that support your views. Citing an extremely limited sample size doesn't do it.
Go to the site promotions page, and find all of the posts that cite short term sample size "trends" and see how they turn out. I'll save you the time. They are worthless.
Now if you can show a large sample of games during a busy part of the season, where as you say lines are "looser", then fine.
Linemakers aren't in the business to give away money. They don't make sloppy lines, or they would go broke. Its up to handicappers to find those situations where, based on their data and research, are exploitable.
Every line is made independent of any other game. The number of games that are played on any given day has zero effect on the accuracy of the line.
We win again. Good luck tomorrow Falcon!
I look forward to your program for baseball. Question - will you start it at the beginning of the season or after a couple of months (as the stats build up).
As there are the most stats of any sport available in bases, you figure a program could crunch the most numbers and thereby glean the best results there.
Did you follow Pops69 when he posted bases? I could never figure his stuff out (numbers and logic not my forte or even my mezzo-piano) but he had lots of dynamic shit going for years and killed it with ump info (where's waldo) for years until one year it leveled off.... Red and other posters are more familiar than I (ie they actually understood it)
Look forward to seeing Hockey as well!
Cheers.
I look forward to your program for baseball. Question - will you start it at the beginning of the season or after a couple of months (as the stats build up).
As there are the most stats of any sport available in bases, you figure a program could crunch the most numbers and thereby glean the best results there.
Did you follow Pops69 when he posted bases? I could never figure his stuff out (numbers and logic not my forte or even my mezzo-piano) but he had lots of dynamic shit going for years and killed it with ump info (where's waldo) for years until one year it leveled off.... Red and other posters are more familiar than I (ie they actually understood it)
Look forward to seeing Hockey as well!
Cheers.
Chugs, program should still perform at the 57.14% level but there are several things that will need to be accounted for.. B2B2Bgames, neutral courts in most games, desperation of the season ending. My volume will slightly decrease, more than likely. Personally, I'll need to begin the transition to other sports. Baseball is just around the corner and I'm seriously working on my NHL as college hoops wind down.
Falcon
Falcon
2016 Top Program Plays
73-50 (+44.50 units) (+$4450)
Feb 26
Yale Over 131.5
Wis Mil Over 134
Boston (-130) NHL
To win 2.50 units ($250) on each.
Worked on this NHL for several hours the last 2-3 days. The program places a number on each game called a SRS number, some of you may recall this.
Example
Boston +21.4
Anaheim -4.40
TB +4.40
Wash +16.50
SJ -35.50
Those would be the SRS numbers on each program selection tonight. The team I listed was the team selected to win.. So two things, I never play the other side and I never play a negative number. Value players may play the other side but I am not a true, high volume value player. I play the highest rated SRS team that I've listed. Tonight that would be Boston.
Good luck guys
Falcon
73-50 (+44.50 units) (+$4450)
Feb 26
Yale Over 131.5
Wis Mil Over 134
Boston (-130) NHL
To win 2.50 units ($250) on each.
Worked on this NHL for several hours the last 2-3 days. The program places a number on each game called a SRS number, some of you may recall this.
Example
Boston +21.4
Anaheim -4.40
TB +4.40
Wash +16.50
SJ -35.50
Those would be the SRS numbers on each program selection tonight. The team I listed was the team selected to win.. So two things, I never play the other side and I never play a negative number. Value players may play the other side but I am not a true, high volume value player. I play the highest rated SRS team that I've listed. Tonight that would be Boston.
Good luck guys
Falcon
This program is 2-3 years old. It actually has done very well late in the seasons, so its a good time for me to be picking this back up.
I ran the five games on the board tonight and this is what my program had to say.
Wash has the highest chance to win tonight but the line was just too high to be the best play. San Jose was the worst play on my board tonight, as u can see the high negative value rating. This would indicate a lot of value in playing Buffalo tonight but I don't use this program in that manner. As I said, I never play a negative value number.
Falcon
I ran the five games on the board tonight and this is what my program had to say.
Wash has the highest chance to win tonight but the line was just too high to be the best play. San Jose was the worst play on my board tonight, as u can see the high negative value rating. This would indicate a lot of value in playing Buffalo tonight but I don't use this program in that manner. As I said, I never play a negative value number.
Falcon
