Thank You, Mr. President: Nearly 19,000 civilians killed in Iraq in 21-month period

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
The only person in the world who can authorize the withdrawal of US troops from a combat zone is the President of the United States. Obama did this, Obama said it was a good idea, Obama bragged about his actions.

You are an utter dumb fuck and terrible liar (because you have a low IQ).

You wake up, drink your ensure and come here to lie and blame Obama for your rotten life. Face it , Bush ended the war and called for no troops to be left in Iraq. If you don't believe me....just check Willie thread......he tells us all about it.

Now go find your teeth and stop lying......then I will stop breaking your jaw.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens

Obama pulled all but a rump troop presence out from Iraq in 2011.

Although heattempted without success to negotiate a residual force of up to 5,000. Historians will have to determine whether Obama could have convinced the Iraqi parliament to accept that force.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Obama swept into office on a pledge to end the Iraq war.



The next president may look at
Obama and decide ending wars is Stupid Shit.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens

Obama pulled all but a rump troop presence out from Iraq in 2011.

Although heattempted without success to negotiate a residual force of up to 5,000. Historians will have to determine whether Obama could have convinced the Iraqi parliament to accept that force.

So you're saying that Obama didn't fight hard enough to convince Iraq to change shitty deal made by Bush. Ok
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
You wake up, drink your ensure and come here to lie and blame Obama for your rotten life. Face it , Bush ended the war and called for no troops to be left in Iraq. If you don't believe me....just check Willie thread......he tells us all about it.

Now go find your teeth and stop lying......then I will stop breaking your jaw.


Maybe you missed post #8 I don't know.

I don't need to humiliate anyone personally to win this debate.

Bottom line Obama is the author of many foreign policy failures, the declarer of so-called events that reverse right in his face.

The drawing fool of lines in the sand that wash away with the tide, and the victor in Iraq in only words and definitely not deeds.

And it's even scarier how he's already branded his wishes for Iran into a perverted reality that will later become another sinkhole.

Obama has had 7 years to at least get Iraq moving in a different direction.

"damn, Willie goes yard"
Vit you can always claim you won this argument. You don't have to lose it entirely. But George Bush as Ernie Harrowell used to say is "Long Gone." Your chance of winning this debate on facts by making declarions like Obama does and talking about 2008 are as ridiculous as trying to find the ball Willie hit and getting George Bush to sign it.

Vit, after 7 years of Obama we're still in a quagmire in Iraq. And a host of others. I remain hopeful of a world waking up to label radical Islamic terror for what it is, and to combine forces to overthrow the regimes that export it. I have a strong belief that in the end civilation will triumph over this tumor of evil. But Obama is ineffective in this combat, more concerned about what history will say about him then joining in the fight. And that's putting it kindly. Again, these are just bottom line facts no amount of Bush blaming can overcome.

 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Maybe you missed post #8 I don't know.

I don't need to humiliate anyone personally to win this debate.

Bottom line Obama is the author of many foreign policy failures, the declarer of so-called events that reverse right in his face.

The drawing fool of lines in the sand that wash away with the tide, and the victor in Iraq in only words and definitely not deeds.

And it's even scarier how he's already branded his wishes for Iran into a perverted reality that will later become another sinkhole.

Obama has had 7 years to at least get Iraq moving in a different direction.

"damn, Willie goes yard"
Vit you can always claim you won this argument. You don't have to lose it entirely. But George Bush as Ernie Harrowell used to say is "Long Gone." Your chance of winning this debate on facts by making declarions like Obama does and talking about 2008 are as ridiculous as trying to find the ball Willie hit and getting George Bush to sign it.

Vit, after 7 years of Obama we're still in a quagmire in Iraq. And a host of others. I remain hopeful of a world waking up to label radical Islamic terror for what it is, and to combine forces to overthrow the regimes that export it. I have a strong belief that in the end civilation will triumph over this tumor of evil. But Obama is ineffective in this combat, more concerned about what history will say about him then joining in the fight. And that's putting it kindly. Again, these are just bottom line facts no amount of Bush blaming can overcome.


So what have I posted that isn't a fact? I'm not saying Obama is completely without blame....and other foreign policy issues can be debated but This is about the Iraq war and its agreement to withdrawal ALL troops and that agreement was in place before Obama took office. Those are facts that cannot be disputed. And the dates in the agreement were also in place before Obama. That's all I'm saying....everything he's done with regards to Iraq can be discussed after he took office but this stuff was already in place.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
. At the time of the withdrawal,Army Gen. Lloyd Austin III was the last U.S. commander in Iraq. He viewed the gains in Iraq as reversible and recommended keeping about 20,00 troops in country.
But his words, and those of other military advisers, were not heeded as Mr. Obama celebrated the last service members leaving Iraq as an end to the war.




“We’re leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq, with a representative government that was elected by its people,” the president said in December 2011.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Why was the Bush administration’s 2008 status of forces agreement allowed to take final effect in Dec. 2011 as military leaders recommended a continued American commitment?





It is fair to say that then-Prime Minister
al-Maliki, his relations with Washington going from bad to worse, was not greatly interested in rewriting the agreement.Mr. Obama was not either, and made no diplomatic push to iron out differences.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Obama had the power to stop the 2008 status of forces agreement taking effect. He was the POTUS.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Why was the Bush administration’s 2008 status of forces agreement allowed to take final effect in Dec. 2011 as military leaders recommended a continued American commitment?





It is fair to say that then-Prime Minister
al-Maliki, his relations with Washington going from bad to worse, was not greatly interested in rewriting the agreement.Mr. Obama was not either, and made no diplomatic push to iron out differences.

Again, expecting Obama to renegotiate a deal for a war he was against.....is silly. Don't blame Obama for Bush horrible decisions to go in and his horrible deal to get out. You have plenty of stuff out there to blame Obama ......don't blame him for stuff done by the previous admin.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
So what have I posted that isn't a fact? I'm not saying Obama is completely without blame....and other foreign policy issues can be debated but This is about the Iraq war and its agreement to withdrawal ALL troops and that agreement was in place before Obama took office. Those are facts that cannot be disputed. And the dates in the agreement were also in place before Obama. That's all I'm saying....everything he's done with regards to Iraq can be discussed after he took office but this stuff was already in place.

This seems like a half-measured response to me. You're sticking to a talking point whose meaning I have already deconstructed. Arguing about 2008 and that the SOFA agreements tied Obama's hands is excuse making for the real issue, that Iraq is still in mass chaos and the cancer of radical Islam has metastasized under Obama's watch. And you and the Rightys here can politicize the entire thing but as far as ridding the world of this evil I don't care what letter is to the right of the president's name.
 

Let's go Brandon!
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
25,236
Tokens
That crazy Obama should of never invaded Iraq! What an idiot huh.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Remarks of President Barack Obama - Responsibly Ending the War in Iraq


Remarks of President Barack Obama - As Prepared for Delivery
Responsibly Ending the War in Iraq
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
Friday, February 27, 2009


Good morning Marines. Good morning Camp Lejeune. Good morning Jacksonville. Thank you for that outstanding welcome. I want to thank Lieutenant General Hejlik for hosting me here today.
I also want to acknowledge all of our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. That includes the Camp Lejeune Marines now serving with – or soon joining – the Second Marine Expeditionary Force in Iraq; those with Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force in Afghanistan; and those among the 8,000 Marines who are preparing to deploy to Afghanistan. We have you in our prayers. We pay tribute to your service. We thank you and your families for all that you do for America. And I want all of you to know that there is no higher honor or greater responsibility than serving as your Commander-in-Chief.
I also want to take this opportunity to acknowledge Ryan Crocker, who recently completed his service as our Ambassador to Iraq. Throughout his career, Ryan always took on the toughest assignments. He is an example of the very best that this nation has to offer, and we owe him a great debt of gratitude. He carried on his work with an extraordinary degree of cooperation with two of our finest Generals – General David Petraeus, and General Ray Odierno – who will be critical in carrying forward the strategy that I will outline today.


Next month will mark the sixth anniversary of the war in Iraq. By any measure, this has already been a long war. For the men and women of America’s armed forces – and for your families – this war has been one of the most extraordinary chapters of service in the history of our nation. You have endured tour after tour after tour of duty. You have known the dangers of combat and the lonely distance of loved ones. You have fought against tyranny and disorder. You have bled for your best friends and for unknown Iraqis. And you have borne an enormous burden for your fellow citizens, while extending a precious opportunity to the people of Iraq. Under tough circumstances, the men and women of the United States military have served with honor, and succeeded beyond any expectation.


Today, I have come to speak to you about how the war in Iraq will end.


To understand where we need to go in Iraq, it is important for the American people to understand where we now stand. Thanks in great measure to your service, the situation in Iraq has improved. Violence has been reduced substantially from the horrific sectarian killing of 2006 and 2007. Al Qaeda in Iraq has been dealt a serious blow by our troops and Iraq’s Security Forces, and through our partnership with Sunni Arabs. The capacity of Iraq’s Security Forces has improved, and Iraq’s leaders have taken steps toward political accommodation. The relative peace and strong participation in January’s provincial elections sent a powerful message to the world about how far Iraqis have come in pursuing their aspirations through a peaceful political process.


But let there be no doubt: Iraq is not yet secure, and there will be difficult days ahead. Violence will continue to be a part of life in Iraq. Too many fundamental political questions about Iraq’s future remain unresolved. Too many Iraqis are still displaced or destitute. Declining oil revenues will put an added strain on a government that has had difficulty delivering basic services. Not all of Iraq’s neighbors are contributing to its security. Some are working at times to undermine it. And even as Iraq’s government is on a surer footing, it is not yet a full partner – politically and economically – in the region, or with the international community


In short, today there is a renewed cause for hope in Iraq, but that hope rests upon an emerging foundation.


On my first full day in office, I directed my national security team to undertake a comprehensive review of our strategy in Iraq to determine the best way to strengthen that foundation, while strengthening American national security. I have listened to my Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and commanders on the ground. We have acted with careful consideration of events on the ground; with respect for the security agreements between the United States and Iraq; and with a critical recognition that the long-term solution in Iraq must be political – not military. Because the most important decisions that have to be made about Iraq’s future must now be made by Iraqis.


We have also taken into account the simple reality that America can no longer afford to see Iraq in isolation from other priorities: we face the challenge of refocusing on Afghanistan and Pakistan; of relieving the burden on our military; and of rebuilding our struggling economy – and these are challenges that we will meet.


Today, I can announce that our review is complete, and that the United States will pursue a new strategy to end the war in Iraq through a transition to full Iraqi responsibility.


This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant. To achieve that goal, we will work to promote an Iraqi government that is just, representative, and accountable, and that provides neither support nor safe-haven to terrorists. We will help Iraq build new ties of trade and commerce with the world. And we will forge a partnership with the people and government of Iraq that contributes to the peace and security of the region.


What we will not do is let the pursuit of the perfect stand in the way of achievable goals. We cannot rid Iraq of all who oppose America or sympathize with our adversaries. We cannot police Iraq’s streets until they are completely safe, nor stay until Iraq’s union is perfected. We cannot sustain indefinitely a commitment that has put a strain on our military, and will cost the American people nearly a trillion dollars. America’s men and women in uniform have fought block by block, province by province, year after year, to give the Iraqis this chance to choose a better future. Now, we must ask the Iraqi people to seize it.


The first part of this strategy is therefore the responsible removal of our combat brigades from Iraq.


As a candidate for President, I made clear my support for a timeline of 16 months to carry out this drawdown, while pledging to consult closely with our military commanders upon taking office to ensure that we preserve the gains we’ve made and protect our troops. Those consultations are now complete, and I have chosen a timeline that will remove our combat brigades over the next 18 months.


Let me say this as plainly as I can: by August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end.


As we carry out this drawdown, my highest priority will be the safety and security of our troops and civilians in Iraq. We will proceed carefully, and I will consult closely with my military commanders on the ground and with the Iraqi government. There will surely be difficult periods and tactical adjustments. But our enemies should be left with no doubt: this plan gives our military the forces and the flexibility they need to support our Iraqi partners, and to succeed.


After we remove our combat brigades, our mission will change from combat to supporting the Iraqi government and its Security Forces as they take the absolute lead in securing their country. As I have long said, we will retain a transitional force to carry out three distinct functions: training, equipping, and advising Iraqi Security Forces as long as they remain non-sectarian; conducting targeted counter-terrorism missions; and protecting our ongoing civilian and military efforts within Iraq. Initially, this force will likely be made up of 35-50,000 U.S. troops.


Through this period of transition, we will carry out further redeployments. And under the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government, I intend to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. We will complete this transition to Iraqi responsibility, and we will bring our troops home with the honor that they have earned.


As we responsibly remove our combat brigades, we will pursue the second part of our strategy: sustained diplomacy on behalf of a more peaceful and prosperous Iraq.


The drawdown of our military should send a clear signal that Iraq’s future is now its own responsibility. The long-term success of the Iraqi nation will depend upon decisions made by Iraq’s leaders and the fortitude of the Iraqi people. Iraq is a sovereign country with legitimate institutions; America cannot – and should not – take their place. However, a strong political, diplomatic, and civilian effort on our part can advance progress and help lay a foundation for lasting peace and security.


This effort will be led by our new Ambassador to Iraq – Chris Hill. From his time in the Peace Corps, to his work in Kosovo and Korea, Ambassador Hill has been tested, and he has shown the pragmatism and skill that we need right now. He will be supported by the courageous and capable work of so many American diplomats and aid workers who are serving in Iraq.


Going forward, we can make a difference on several fronts. We will work with the United Nations to support national elections, while helping Iraqis improve local government. We can serve as an honest broker in pursuit of fair and durable agreements on issues that have divided Iraq’s leaders. And just as we will support Iraq’s Security Forces, we will help Iraqi institutions strengthen their capacity to protect the rule of law, confront corruption, and deliver basic services.


Diplomacy and assistance is also required to help the millions of displaced Iraqis. These men, women and children are a living consequence of this war and a challenge to stability in the region, and they must become a part of Iraq’s reconciliation and recovery. America has a strategic interest – and a moral responsibility – to act. In the coming months, my administration will provide more assistance and take steps to increase international support for countries already hosting refugees; we’ll cooperate with others to resettle Iraqis facing great personal risk; and we will work with the Iraqi government over time to resettle refugees and displaced Iraqis within Iraq – because there are few more powerful indicators of lasting peace than displaced citizens returning home.


Now, before I go any further, I want to take a moment to speak directly to the people of Iraq.


You are a great nation, rooted in the cradle of civilization. You are joined together by enduring accomplishments, and a history that connects you as surely as the two rivers carved into your land. In years past, you have persevered through tyranny and terror; through personal insecurity and sectarian violence. And instead of giving in to the forces of disunion, you stepped back from a descent into civil war, and showed a proud resilience that deserves respect.


Our nations have known difficult times together. But ours is a bond forged by shared bloodshed, and countless friendships among our people. We Americans have offered our most precious resource – our young men and women – to work with you to rebuild what was destroyed by despotism; to root out our common enemies; and to seek peace and prosperity for our children and grandchildren, and for yours.


There are those who will try to prevent that future for Iraq – who will insist that Iraq’s differences cannot be reconciled without more killing. They represent the forces that destroy nations and lead only to despair, and they will test our will in the months and years to come. America, too, has known these forces. We endured the pain of Civil War, and bitter divisions of region and race. But hostility and hatred are no match for justice; they offer no pathway to peace; and they must not stand between the people of Iraq and a future of reconciliation and hope.


So to the Iraqi people, let me be clear about America’s intentions. The United States pursues no claim on your territory or your resources. We respect your sovereignty and the tremendous sacrifices you have made for your country. We seek a full transition to Iraqi responsibility for the security of your country. And going forward, we can build a lasting relationship founded upon mutual interests and mutual respect as Iraq takes its rightful place in the community of nations.


That leads me to the third part of our strategy –comprehensive American engagement across the region.


The future of Iraq is inseparable from the future of the broader Middle East, so we must work with our friends and partners to establish a new framework that advances Iraq’s security and the region’s. It is time for Iraq to be a full partner in a regional dialogue, and for Iraq’s neighbors to establish productive and normalized relations with Iraq. And going forward, the United States will pursue principled and sustained engagement with all of the nations in the region, and that will include Iran and Syria.


This reflects a fundamental truth: we can no longer deal with regional challenges in isolation – we need a smarter, more sustainable and comprehensive approach. That is why we are renewing our diplomacy, while relieving the burden on our military. That is why we are refocusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world. And that is why we have named three of America’s most accomplished diplomats – George Mitchell, Dennis Ross and Richard Holbrooke – to support Secretary Clinton and me as we carry forward this agenda.


Every nation and every group must know – whether you wish America good or ill – that the end of the war in Iraq will enable a new era of American leadership and engagement in the Middle East. And that era has just begun.


Finally, I want to be very clear that my strategy for ending the war in Iraq does not end with military plans or diplomatic agendas – it endures through our commitment to uphold our sacred trust with every man and woman who has served in Iraq.


You make up a fraction of the American population, but in an age when so many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly, you did the opposite – you volunteered to bear the heaviest burden. And for you and for your families, the war does not end when you come home. It lives on in memories of your fellow soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who gave their lives. It endures in the wound that is slow to heal, the disability that isn’t going away, the dream that wakes you at night, or the stiffening in your spine when a car backfires down the street.


You and your families have done your duty – now a grateful nation must do ours. That is why I am increasing the number of soldiers and Marines, so that we lessen the burden on those who are serving. And that is why I have committed to expanding our system of veterans health care to serve more patients, and to provide better care in more places. We will continue building new wounded warrior facilities across America, and invest in new ways of identifying and treating the signature wounds of this war: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury, as well as other combat injuries.


We also know that service does not end with the person wearing the uniform. In her visits with military families across the country, my wife Michelle has learned firsthand about the unique burden that your families endure every day. I want you to know this: military families are a top priority for Michelle and me, and they will be a top priority for my administration. We’ll raise military pay, and continue providing quality child-care, job-training for spouses, and expanded counseling and outreach to families that have known the separation and stress of war. We will also heed the lesson of history – that those who fight in battle can form the backbone of our middle class – by implementing a 21st century GI Bill to help our veterans live their dreams.


As a nation, we have had our share of debates about the war in Iraq. It has, at times, divided us as a people. To this very day, there are some Americans who want to stay in Iraq longer, and some who want to leave faster. But there should be no disagreement on what the men and women of our military have achieved.


And so I want to be very clear: We sent our troops to Iraq to do away with Saddam Hussein’s regime – and you got the job done. We kept our troops in Iraq to help establish a sovereign government – and you got the job done. And we will leave the Iraqi people with a hard-earned opportunity to live a better life – that is your achievement; that is the prospect that you have made possible.


There are many lessons to be learned from what we’ve experienced. We have learned that America must go to war with clearly defined goals, which is why I’ve ordered a review of our policy in Afghanistan. We have learned that we must always weigh the costs of action, and communicate those costs candidly to the American people, which is why I’ve put Iraq and Afghanistan into my budget. We have learned that in the 21st century, we must use all elements of American power to achieve our objectives, which is why I am committed to building our civilian national security capacity so that the burden is not continually pushed on to our military. We have learned that our political leaders must pursue the broad and bipartisan support that our national security policies depend upon, which is why I will consult with Congress and in carrying out my plans. And we have learned the importance of working closely with friends and allies, which is why we are launching a new era of engagement in the world.


The starting point for our policies must always be the safety of the American people. I know that you – the men and women of the finest fighting force in the history of the world – can meet any challenge, and defeat any foe. And as long as I am your Commander-in-Chief, I promise you that I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary, and provide you with the equipment and support you need to get the job done. That is the most important lesson of all – for the consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable.


You know because you have seen those sacrifices. You have lived them. And we all honor them.


"Semper Fidelis" – it means always being faithful to Corps, and to country, and to the memory of fallen comrades like Corporal Jonathan Yale and Lance Corporal Jordan Haerter. These young men enlisted in a time of war, knowing they would face great danger. They came here, to Camp Lejeune, as they trained for their mission. And last April, they were standing guard in Anbar. In an age when suicide is a weapon, they were suddenly faced with an oncoming truck filled with explosives. These two Marines stood their ground. These two Marines opened fire. And these two Marines stopped that truck. When the thousands of pounds of explosives detonated, they had saved fifty Marines and Iraqi police who would have been in the truck’s path, but Corporal Yale and Lance Corporal Haerter lost their own lives. Jonathan was 21. Jordan was 19.


In the town where Jordan Haerter was from, a bridge was dedicated in his name. One Marine who traveled to the ceremony said: "We flew here from all over the country to pay tribute to our friend Jordan, who risked his life to save us. We wouldn’t be here without him."


America’s time in Iraq is filled with stories of men and women like this. Their names are written into bridges and town squares. They are etched into stones at Arlington, and in quiet places of rest across our land. They are spoken in schools and on city blocks. They live on in the memories of those who wear your uniform, in the hearts of those they loved, and in the freedom of the nation they served.


Each American who has served in Iraq has their own story. Each of you has your own story. And that story is now a part of the history of the United States of America – a nation that exists only because free men and women have bled for it from the beaches of Normandy to the deserts of Anbar; from the mountains of Korea to the streets of Kandahar. You teach us that the price of freedom is great. Your sacrifice should challenge all of us – every single American – to ask what we can do to be better citizens.


There will be more danger in the months ahead. We will face new tests and unforeseen trials. But thanks to the sacrifices of those who have served, we have forged hard-earned progress, we are leaving Iraq to its people, and we have begun the work of ending this war.


Thank you, God Bless you, and God Bless the United States of America. Semper Fi.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,899
Tokens
Again, expecting Obama to renegotiate a deal for a war he was against.....is silly.

Except Obama was re-negotiating this. A fact that has been pointed out to you numerous times. But since you're an abject fucking imbecile, you go with your idiotic talking points.

Over the last year, in late-night meetings at the fortified compound of the Iraqi president, Jalal Talabani, and in video conferences between Baghdad and Washington, American and Iraqi negotiators had struggled to reach an agreement. All the while, both Mr. Obama and the Iraqi prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, gave the world a wink and nod, always saying that Iraq was ready to stand on its own but never fully closing the door on the possibility of American troops’ staying on.

Through the summer, American officials continued to assume that the agreement would be amended, and Mr. Obama was willing to support a continued military presence.



=====
Watching you comment on this topic is like watching a child scream at the the ice cream truck.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
This seems like a half-measured response to me. You're sticking to a talking point whose meaning I have already deconstructed. Arguing about 2008 and that the SOFA agreements tied Obama's hands is excuse making for the real issue, that Iraq is still in mass chaos and the cancer of radical Islam has metastasized under Obama's watch. And you and the Rightys here can politicize the entire thing but as far as ridding the world of this evil I don't care what letter is to the right of the president's name.[/QUOTE

SOFA agreements DID NOT tied Obama's hands .


He was POTUS and he said in his speech


Today, I have come to speak to you about how the war in Iraq will end.
We have acted with careful consideration of events on the ground;

United States will pursue a new strategy to end the war in Iraq through a transition to full Iraqi responsibility.

United States will pursue a new strategy to end the war in Iraq through a transition to full Iraqi responsibility.

The first part of this strategy is therefore the responsible removal of our combat brigades from Iraq.


As a candidate for President, I made clear my support for a timeline of 16 months to carry out this drawdown



I have chosen a timeline that will remove our combat brigades over the next 18 months.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,899
Tokens
And remember, President Bush gets "some of the blame for 9/11" despite the fact that the operation was planned prior to his presidency and the hijackers came to America prior to his Presidency. But withdrawing US troops from Iraq, something Obama said he would do, did, and bragged about it, "has nothing to do with Obama"

I can't imagine what it is like to be so fucking stupid that you would actually hold such a position and tell others you hold such a position.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,899
Tokens
Nothing to do with Obama!!

The U.S. has been withdrawing about 520 military personnel every day in accordance with the mission set by Obama in early 2009, sources told NBC News.

Nothing to do with Obama!!

From the Jan. 20 start of his presidency to his deadline for ending the combat mission, Obama has settled on a 19-month withdrawal. He had promised the faster pace of 16 months during his campaign but also said he would confer with military commanders on a responsible exit.
Officials said Thursday that the timetable Obama ultimately selected...

:):)

When you are a complete fucking idiot & liar, some other magical force other than POTUS moves US Military personnel around the world...
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Nothing to do with Obama!!

The U.S. has been withdrawing about 520 military personnel every day in accordance with the mission set by Obama in early 2009, sources told NBC News.

Nothing to do with Obama!!

From the Jan. 20 start of his presidency to his deadline for ending the combat mission, Obama has settled on a 19-month withdrawal. He had promised the faster pace of 16 months during his campaign but also said he would confer with military commanders on a responsible exit.
Officials said Thursday that the timetable Obama ultimately selected...

:):)

When you are a complete fucking idiot & liar, some other magical force other than POTUS moves US Military personnel around the world...

Ummmmm......we already know this. He had to have the troops out by a certain date .......the date established in the Status of Forces agreement




Obamas Fault!!!!! Lmao. Good call. Lying ace strikes again
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
SOFA 2008 is a Red Herring. When Obama took office 2009, it was water under the bridge.

Negotiations between the U.S. and Iraq for a new SOFA began in fall 2010. (OBAMA).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,875
Messages
13,574,501
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com