You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
So when a protester gets kicked out of a clinton rally no media outrage, but when the same happens to trump......
- Thread starter phdinsports
- Start date
LOL you're clueless man! I never said that! The whole thing is Trump gets way more NEGATIVE PRESS than Clinton! The case is proven by using the exact same incident.
Trump gets more press than anyone else right now. Negative or not.....and if he changed his party registration to dem.....it would be the exact same way. You're delusional about this and should probably stick to Canadian Parliment stuff. The "liberal media" bias thing is played out and not based in reality. It's conservative excuses.
Trump gets more press than anyone else right now. Negative or not.....and if he changed his party registration to dem.....it would be the exact same way. You're delusional about this and should probably stick to Canadian Parliment stuff. The "liberal media" bias thing is played out and not based in reality. It's conservative excuses.
If he changed his party!?!?! This is your opinion I'm stating facts! Please know the difference if you wish to continue!
Yeah and if he changed party is!?!?! Come on man! keep trying!
It's odd that you can't grasp what's happening. Media goes where media can get eyes on their shit and that gets them paid......nothing else matters to them now. That "liberal media" nonsense was true back in the day but not anymore. Time for you to move into the 2000's era.
It's odd that you can't grasp what's happening. Media goes where media can get eyes on their shit and that gets them paid......nothing else matters to them now. That "liberal media" nonsense was true back in the day but not anymore. Time for you to move into the 2000's era.
True back in the day!?!?! Another opinion! You're doing great! Prove it then that the media is less biased today!!
True back in the day!?!?! Another opinion! You're doing great! Prove it then that the media is less biased today!!
Oh my God.....are we in court?
www.politicususa.com/2014/09/20/myth-liberal-media-bias-destroyed-study-finds-conservatives-dominate-sunday-shows.html
i can google a bunch more of these if you like. There is one that goes on for pages about liberal media bias myth.
http://www.proudtobecanadian.ca/tag/liberal-media-bias/
http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_bias
I could paste numerous websites too! Post facts from unbiased websites please!
http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_bias
I could paste numerous websites too! Post facts from unbiased websites please!
http://www.proudtobecanadian.ca/tag/liberal-media-bias/
http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_bias
I could paste numerous websites too! Post facts from unbiased websites please!
I posted facts. A study showed the truth !!!
In case you haven't notice I'm from Canada, Barrie Ontario to be precise. Trump doesn't make the ctv news up here, but this incident did! No mention of the Clinton protester up here. And no it's not a conspiracy but a fact that the media is liberal and promotes liberal ideology. Here's fact number two! A unionville family sponsored six Syrian refugees in December. Last week the daughter was groped no media attention. Last week a cyclist pepper sprayed a group of Syrians in Vancouver, made national headlines even Truduh condemned the "attack" Have you caught on yet or need I go on?
I'm curious as to your thought that Romney had his staff delete thousands of e-mails in the waning days of his adminsitration in Mass, and how little publicity-until very recently-that scumbag Republican governor of Michigan has gotten for appointing a non elected "city manager" to head Flint; you know, the guy who poisoned the water there, stonewalled all the derogatory evidence for months, only to finally issue a lame ass, way-too-late apology?
I'm curious as to your thought that Romney had his staff delete thousands of e-mails in the waning days of his adminsitration in Mass, and how little publicity-until very recently-that scumbag Republican governor of Michigan has gotten for appointing a non elected "city manager" to head Flint; you know, the guy who poisoned the water there, stonewalled all the derogatory evidence for months, only to finally issue a lame ass, way-too-late apology?
Apples to oranges! Can't compare a state leader to the soon to be leader of the free world! That is why I compared the exact same accident by the two leaders of their respective parties, in which one of them will be the leader of the free world!
In conclusion vitterd
1) I drew a comparison of the exact same incident by leaders of their respective parties, how one leader Trump drew mass negative criticism and the other Clinton drew what amounts to a drop in a bucket! That fact that you at first attempted to deny this is laughable!
2) Your main argument is Trump is popular, well I got news for you, Clinton isn't exactly chop liver when it comes to popularity, In fact before Trump threw his name into the candidacy, Clinton as the former first lady of a very popular president and the former secretary of state was in the news media much more than Trump! Not a lot of people watch apprentice outside the USA.
3) Finally I gave you a clear concise example of heads of state from another country (Canada) in which multiple PM's commit the exact same transgression, including our most popular PM (again proving that popularity is not the be all end all when it comes to political criticism) and another popular Liberal PM, and yet they did not receive that same criticism that a conservative PM received! Not even close! Your rebuttal, you pleaded ignorance!
So be it! Case closed! I'm done with you.
1) I drew a comparison of the exact same incident by leaders of their respective parties, how one leader Trump drew mass negative criticism and the other Clinton drew what amounts to a drop in a bucket! That fact that you at first attempted to deny this is laughable!
2) Your main argument is Trump is popular, well I got news for you, Clinton isn't exactly chop liver when it comes to popularity, In fact before Trump threw his name into the candidacy, Clinton as the former first lady of a very popular president and the former secretary of state was in the news media much more than Trump! Not a lot of people watch apprentice outside the USA.
3) Finally I gave you a clear concise example of heads of state from another country (Canada) in which multiple PM's commit the exact same transgression, including our most popular PM (again proving that popularity is not the be all end all when it comes to political criticism) and another popular Liberal PM, and yet they did not receive that same criticism that a conservative PM received! Not even close! Your rebuttal, you pleaded ignorance!
So be it! Case closed! I'm done with you.
I'm curious as to your thought that Romney had his staff delete thousands of e-mails in the waning days of his adminsitration in Mass, and how little publicity-until very recently-that scumbag Republican governor of Michigan has gotten for appointing a non elected "city manager" to head Flint; you know, the guy who poisoned the water there, stonewalled all the derogatory evidence for months, only to finally issue a lame ass, way-too-late apology?
Also find a liberal doing the same thing, holding the same position and than you can draw a fair comparison.
In conclusion vitterd
1) I drew a comparison of the exact same incident by leaders of their respective parties, how one leader Trump drew mass negative criticism and the other Clinton drew what amounts to a drop in a bucket! That fact that you at first attempted to deny this is laughable!
2) Your main argument is Trump is popular, well I got news for you, Clinton isn't exactly chop liver when it comes to popularity, In fact before Trump threw his name into the candidacy, Clinton as the former first lady of a very popular president and the former secretary of state was in the news media much more than Trump! Not a lot of people watch apprentice outside the USA.
3) Finally I gave you a clear concise example of heads of state from another country (Canada) in which multiple PM's commit the exact same transgression, including our most popular PM (again proving that popularity is not the be all end all when it comes to political criticism) and another popular Liberal PM, and yet they did not receive that same criticism that a conservative PM received! Not even close! Your rebuttal, you pleaded ignorance!
So be it! Case closed! I'm done with you.
You don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.
I cited a study to prove my point.....you cited your one example that you studied in your living room.
Again, nobody is debating you on what the Canada media is doing. Most of us don't follow or have Canada tv stations. But your " liberal media" myth in regards to the United States.....simply doesn't exist......except in the heads of delusional conservatives.
You lose.
you don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.
I cited a study to prove my point.....you cited your one example that you studied in your living room.
Again, nobody is debating you on what the canada media is doing. Most of us don't follow or have canada tv stations. But your " liberal media" myth in regards to the united states.....simply doesn't exist......except in the heads of delusional conservatives.
You lose.
lol ok!
