I prefer not to consider myself a tout. Do I charge about $2/play to my clients in exchange for hours of detailed trend analysis, comprehensive writeups (similar to those linked in week 9 above), and my targeted computer program plays? Yes, I do.
Did I hit 67% last season on those $2 plays, and do I think that is more than a cheap as dirt price to pay for 67% winners? Yes, I do.
Do I think it is fair that "touts" charge $25+ per play, and hit in the mid 50%s if they are lucky? No, I don't.
Do I realize that cutting into a players bankroll by charging $25+/play is counter productive for the player? Yes, I do.
Am I trying to offer an alternative to players who want to hit mid 60% (67% over 3 yrs now) but don't want to spend $25+/play because they don't have a massive bankroll? Yes, I am.
I really am trying to bring a slap-to-the-face of touts who think its their God given right to overcharge and underperform, and they still will get clients. I'm undercharging and overperforming, and will continue my best to do so in the future.
Several members on here charge for plays. Ace-Ace posts all his plays free even though he charges. Nothing wrong with that. Since I like the RX and the community, I still stick around to share analysis, help out where I can w/ questions, and I'll post a play from time to time, but I'm not posting them regularly like I did early last season.
