Shrink, what do you know and when did you know it?

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Shrink is dammed if he does and dammed if he does'nt. Regardless of the timeline when he finds out a book advertizing here is possibly in trouble he should do something. So he takes them down, why? To protect his readers from postting up with them on his say so, and to worn others that have funds posted up, they may have a problem. If it turns out his info is bad or a scam by some poster he injures an innocent book. If he waits until more info is available he will get accused of exposing his readers to a possibly weak, or untrustworthy book. Can't win either way. I say where there is smoke there is usually fire, take the book down quick. Whether this is firm policy here at the Rx. I cannot answer, it seems to be in this case.


wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Tokens
My view:

Some key information is missing and I think the Shrink owes Rx readers an explanation.

I think FatFrank is correct to point it out and demand an explanation but his tone was unduly harsh and open speculation about what (if anything) was prearranged is unwarranted at this stage. If the Shrink fails to respond adequately, the tone could be justifiably strengthened, but not until then IMO.

Kudos to Patrick for laying out what he knows.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
wilheim,

I was taking a shitt last night and thought of you... I was reading Zagat Survey 2004 Movie Guide. Which line in the GodFather did they say was the best? You guessed it... "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."

[This message was edited by FatFrank on September 29, 2003 at 06:57 PM.]
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
Two things I want to stress. The first is this information was from a respected party all along. Often you hear stuff from players who got booted and/or folks with an agenda. This was seemingly credible right from the start. I would guess he sat on it and when the player dispute made it's way to him exactly the way the source said things got his attention.

The last thing is when the book did not return the call. In most cases when a book is involved that advertises here they can not get back with you quick enough! They are HUNGRY to tell you the real story. They are pissed off and adamant about telling you the real deal. None of that happened, in fact I believe to this moment they have still not contacted the Shrink. I could be wrong on that so don't quote me. Anyway around that time I would guess Shrink pulled them off the site, maybe in hopes then they would call at least.

Again this may not be exact but it's pretty damn close as far as I know. My only problem is figuring out why people would think the RX would benefit from pulling down a paying advertiser? Usually you get criticized for hanging on till the bitter end. LOL. Anyway this is the truth as I know it. I'm still willing to entertain any sort of conspiracy theory someone has if they tell me exactly what it is. (I'm still laughing over the Rx sneaking beards in at EWinner one
icon_smile.gif
)

Anyway appreciate the civil tone of this. We need this stuff to strengthen as an industry. Guys like Frank and others who raise issues never bother me at all, just be reasonable if it comes to look as the truth was told by us. Thanks.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
>I think the Shrink owes Rx readers an explanation.

We'll see... When you deal with Ken you must be harsh! He sees meekness as a weakness
icon_eek.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
You're right, Wilheim, about the damned part - lol. I also think this has a 'grassy knoll' flavor to it ...

1 - Ken gets info from his source about a possible low/no-funds situation

2 - Poster puts up a dispute post with said book

3 - book refuses to speak with Ken

4 - advertising gets pulled

Did #1 happen before or after #2, and for how long was #1 known? I think FF is asking how long did Ken have the insider info about the possible low/no-funds situation at the book before it was made public?

Before I get a new asshole ripped, I'm not personally a conspiracy theorist - but I've been around forums long enough to know exactly what is going to transpire (Camelot, Aces Gold, yada yada yada), and I believe that question is going to get pounded to death.

I'm simply reducing all of this to what I perceive to be FF's central question - this right, FF?

p.s. Thanks for the responses, Pat, I guess we'll find out once Ken gets back.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
>Rx would benefit from pulling down a paying advertiser?

icon_rolleyes.gif


You aint this dumb...
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
>I think FF is asking how long did Ken have the
>insider info about the possible low/no-funds situation
>at the book before it was made public?

That's a starter...

We have heard about friends getting out before it is posted in public - But no way that could happen here.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
I am flattered you think of me while taking a crap. LOL. Ya the Cannoli line is one of my favorites, but there are so many. EG. "Tattaglia's a pimp. He never coulda outfought Santino. But I didn't know until this day, that it was Barzini all along." Another goody.

gf1.jpg



wil.
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FatFrank:
>I think FF is asking how long did Ken have the
>insider info about the possible low/no-funds situation
>at the book before it was made public?

That's a starter...

We have heard about friends getting out before it is posted in public - But no way that could happen here.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Your losing me? You first (2nd post in this thread) were angry they were pulled in one hour I thought? Now you are angry we sat on it too long? LOL. Which is it?

Also why answer with something like "you ain't that dumb". Yes I am that dumb. I never saw your first angle of Shrink moving syndicate money through EWinner with those dime a game beards. LOL! Don't stop now with the edumacation Frank! Why do I have to pull out of you what you are thinking? Say it if you have something. You seem to be waiting for something to crop up to hang your hat on here. Then it will be "I knew it all along". Like they say a broken clock is right twice a day.
icon_wink.gif


Chinesse used to say man who stand on toilet high on pot.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
Pat, studbolt's post and the one hour thing was just for show... How long BEFORE did Ken know and what did he know?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
Pat, As for as your "edumacation" READ THE FU(KING TITLE...

You dont know shit about this. I'm waiting on Kenny.
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FatFrank:
Pat, studbolt's post and the one hour thing was just for show... How long BEFORE did Ken know and what did he know?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah, I think there's a whole lot of stuff going on here for show.

Pop used to say thank GOD there ain't no busses running today.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
Pat, aren't you bit ashamed having to play the dumb Mod today and try to divert away from the crux of my post?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
409
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by STRUT888/FISHHEAD:
Shrink is NOT going to pull an advertiser without justification. Wake up!
I can understand why the divorce rate is so high these days......why would a women want to be around such negative males that have a chip on thier shoulders everyday and cry about every ounce of spilled milk.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

What a stupid post. Please stay out of this thread.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
>What a stupid post.

Fish was trying to take a personal jab at me, that's all... probably was cooked up in the board room.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
409
Tokens
I believe there is a rule here. Attack the post not the poster. Its sad when a mod can't even follow this simple rule.

Shrink, you really need to rethink who you have represnting this site for you.
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FatFrank:
>What a stupid post.

Fish was trying to take a personal jab at me, that's all... probably was cooked up in the board room.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


LOL frank thats bullshit ...we do not cook up attacks there.. but believe WHATEVER you want
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
409
Tokens
I really believe you dont Dante. But have a word with fished/strut and go over the rules with him please. He makes this forum look stupid with his worthless posts.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
>LOL frank thats bullshit

LOL

You mean Fish came up with an orginal idea?
icon_wink.gif


Fish, go drop a quarter in a VP machine you rent is coming due.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,944
Messages
13,589,060
Members
101,021
Latest member
bradduke112
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com