shrink and others who have mod powers

dogball · May 31, 2003

Judge-

Naturally real identies should be protected at all cost. That post could have achieved its goal without the use of a real name. Rx did a good job in bringing it down. I have read the post as well and am curious as to your opinion on one matter-

As you say, most of the people in the know were aware of this allready, I was not , nor am I in the know, but If people like General, not him specifically, but RX people were aware of this, do you think this has an adverse affect on the RX?

Dicky ?
Or am I completly misunderstanding the heart of the issue here?

THE SHRINK · May 31, 2003

DickyW,

You and Judge are both wise men...

DickyW · May 31, 2003

Dogball
Right now I am baffled trying to figure out how the fvck I just posted three times.

TheGeneral+ · May 31, 2003

I see agenda posts day in and day out.

I was slammed pretty seriously on this board by Joey for my disagreement with Cris. Where were the crusaders for me when my integrity/honesty was being questioned by him?

I assure you i didnt have any personal friendships or ties with the players involved.

Without the names included, the story was very suitable for this board IMO.

Chadster · May 31, 2003

DickyW · May 31, 2003

Shrink
Hardly "Wise" if that was the case I could figure out how to edit a post without fvckin up the whole thread.

Journeyman · May 31, 2003

General , BUT if you came for with more information instead of just a general opinion which is what it looked like maybe you would have goten a better response...It only looked like you were speculating.....If this turns out to be what it looks like then General I appologize totally.

THE SHRINK · May 31, 2003

Dicy,

I just deleted one of your posts that had only a letter in it, lol...

Any other requests?

JudgeWapner · May 31, 2003

General,point well taken.But let me note JC,was defending Cris out of friendsship and loyalty,not out of financial interest.

THE SHRINK · May 31, 2003

Judge,

WELL SAID!

Sting's article was malicious and I cannot believe you think we should display it here for all to see General...

In fact, if the writer chose to take it down, then why should we put it back up?

That makes us look even worse...

THE SHRINK

dogball · May 31, 2003

Friendship and loyalty are not reasons to defend a book, Principal is. I am sure it was not for financial interest, but I hope it was not for loyalty.

Good point Ken-
In fact, if the writer took it down, then why should we put it up?

Chadster · May 31, 2003

how was it malicious? because it has his name? thats the only thing i saw and i may be wrong. the rest of the story was 99.9% factual. Also there were excerpts from here in the forum.

THE SHRINK · May 31, 2003

Jay,

I read the story and it was NOT 99.9% factual...

If that were the case, it would surely not have been taken down by STING!

JudgeWapner · May 31, 2003

Jay,anything that could cause someone legal problems,I think is malicious.And to me that was the point of the post was to do exactly that.Why else use names.

Chadster · May 31, 2003

ok i'll go with 85 - 90%

JudgeWapner · May 31, 2003

Sting would never let his personal feelings get in the way of the truth.

Chadster · May 31, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Judge Wapner:
Jay,anything that could cause someone legal problems,I think is malicious.And to me that was the point of the post was to do exactly that.Why else use names.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I agree with the no naming names no doubt 100% I do.

Forum or not all this shit will come back and bite us in the ass one day.

Maybe he was going about all wrong as I was a year or so ago. Posting slander here and there and pulling my own horn here and there for the books I was with and supported.

THE SHRINK · May 31, 2003

Jay,

You of all people should understand. You moved back to the states, How would you like it if there was a complete BIO of you dedicated to everything you did offshore, every connection you had with sports books, and then to top it off, the use of your REAL NAME??!!

Chadster · May 31, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Judge Wapner:
Sting would never let his personal feelings get in the way of the truth.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

LMAO

Chadster · May 31, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by THE SHRINK:
Jay,

You of all people should understand. You moved back to the states, How would you like it if there was a complete BIO of you dedicated to _everything_ you did offshore, every _connection_ you had with sports books, and then to top it off, the use of your _REAL NAME??!!_<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

100% I understand.