Guys, it's very clear many of you have not read the grand jury testimony which is an open document that all of you have access to just by doing a little research online.
It's obvious because many of you are guessing at what YOU THINK McQueary told Joe Paterno. The fact is that the grand jury document explains exactly what McQueary says he told Coach Paterno.
Instead of guessing, just do a little research on your own. Again, I'm not saying Paterno is innocent and should not have done more but you guys think McQueary went over and told Paterno he saw a kid being raped in the shower. According to McQueary's own testimony, this is not what he reported. Read it for yourselves.
Enfuego, did you read all of the legal documents??? Can you read? Please stop posting. The grand jury foreman asked Paterno "without getting into graphic detail, what did Mr. McQueary tell you he had seen and where"? Operative words, without getting into graphic detail. Paterno replied quote "Well, he had seen a person, an older-not an older, but a mature person who was fondling, whatever you might call it - I'm not sure what the term would be - a young boy"
Okay, after being told not to go into graphic detail Paterno said by HIS OWN WORDS HE HAD SEEN SANDUSKY FONDLING A YOUNG BOY!!! WHAT THE F MORE DO YOU NEED!
The grand jury foreman than asked quote "I think you used the term fondling. Is that the term you used"? To which Paterno replied "Well, I don't know what you would call it. Obviously he was doing something to the youngster. It was sexual in nature. I am not exactly sure what it was. I didn't push Mike to describe exactly what it was because he was very upset. So I told-I didn't go any further than that except I knew Mike was upset and I knew some kind of inappropriate action was being taken by Jerry Sandusky with a youngster".
So JeoPa admits Sandusky was doing something of a sexual nature,fondling, with a youngster in the Penn State Football showers when no one was around! Not only that, he admits he did not push McQueary to get into details because McQueary, a 28 year old man at the time, was visibly upset. So visibly upset, the nobody grad asst. McQueary calls the legendary head coach JoePa at 800 AM on a Saturday morning and demands an immediate meeting over a non-football issue. Need I go on? Enfuego, what do you need, McQueary showing a video of Sandusky raping a kid on his Iphone to Paterno?
Enfuego, but you say "but you guys think McQueary went over and told Paterno he saw a kid being raped in the shower. According to McQuaery's own testimony, this is not what he reported". Again, you are wrong! McQueary testified I quote "
I went to his house (JoePA) and sat at his kitchen table and told him I saw Jerry with a young boy in the shower. That it was way over the lines and extremely sexual in nature. The rough positioning I described but not in much detail". Enfuego, maybe you and me have different definitions of rape but an adult doing something extremely sexual in nature alone in a shower with a minor is rape. Since when is it not rape for an adult and a minor to be alone in a shower doing something sexual in nature?
What did you want McQueary to say, how he saw Sandusky spreading the butt cheeks of a kid? How much detail do you need? I am glad that PSU entrusted JoePa to teach hundreds of young men but he was too senile to understand what was going on in his own locker room. PSU football should be on the death penalty to set an example. Hundred times worse than paying James & Dickerson or getting tatoos for memorabilia.