It's why accusers of sexual abuse don't come forward. They're afraid (rightfully so) of other pedophiles like brucy here disparaging them and calling them liars.
It takes guts to sit in that courtroom and point a finger at your abuser. Good for them. They deserve every penny they got.
"No evidence at all"....proves my point.
It takes guts to sit in that courtroom and point a finger at your abuser. Good for them. They deserve every penny they got.
"No evidence at all"....proves my point.
Really ? So it makes total sense to you that NOT ONE , of the accusers said anything, to anyone ?
It makes sense to you many ,if not most of the accusers defended Jerry and claimed he was innocent util they lawyered up and the Penn State corrupt BOT said they would pay anyone who ever even bumped into Jerry on campus.
So it makes total sense to you that these victims all "repressed' every memory they ever had of any abuse, until checks were offered to them of millions of dollars , when their memories became Crystal clear . Like Aaron, who repressed the memory of himself walking like a zombie over to Jerry's home , saying he was abused over 100 times !
It makes sense that the ONLY porn found in this case was on this guys computers http://www.bigtrial.net/2018/08/its-slime-fest-in-frank-finas-ethics.html
It makes sense to you that Jerry turned into a monster pedophile in his 50's, yet no claim against him AT ALL, until then. No abuse in his family, and came from a perfectly good , loving family .
Yet all his accusers were ABUSE victims, came from broken homes, juvenile delinquent , white trash lost drug addict kids, with no future, and hating the world ?
It makes total sense that no one involved in this case is a homosexual
It makes sense to you that Jerry and Dottie ( who still lives in state college by the way ), maintains his innocence where every other convicted ped. at this point confesses, and spouse dumps him like yesterdays newspaper ?
It makes total sense to you that while the corrupt, and bought and paid for Louis Freeh was conducting his 'investigation" he refused to speak or collaborate with a simultaneous investigation by the US GOVT , to determine what the hell went on here, and should Spanier ( a child abuse victim himself so obviously very much inclined to cover up an abuser ) keep his national security clearance, which by the way was the highest given out ! http://www.bigtrial.net/2017/03/special-agent-who-investigated-spanier.html
It makes total sense to that Jerry was PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE of any of this since he had EXTREMELY low levels of testosterone, and literally no testicles ! ( which not one of these accusers ever mentioned!)
http://www.framingpaterno.com/sites/default/files/Perfect Sense January 2015.pdf
It all makes perfect sense to you I guess
The whole case is BULLSHIT !
Seriously? You think it wouldn't come out by now ? John Z is VERY visible all over social media , and has been approached by many many people regarding these accusers . All of the people that have reached out to him have been to say, many on record, that that particular accuser is lying . You dont think by now ONE person would have come forward to say FU John, I was told this particular accuser that he was being harmed years ago and your are wrong.
Not one
Im not defending Penn State. Yes I went there and now have a love hate relationship with everyone involved with the school . The fact that no one has the balls to speak up who know the truth is sickening to me, and that includes the Paterno family . Everyone has a vested interest in letting that poor man rot in jail to protect their own reputation, and not put themselves through the backlash of the sheep, who know nothing about the case, and have been manipulated by the strongest case of media malpractice I have ever seen The truth just doesn't matter .
Read Marks book, its excellent https://books.google.com/books/abou..._America.html?id=-RRitAEACAAJ&source=kp_cover No one will even interview him, or discuss the book ! The case is that toxic
Its all a lie. If it could happen to Joe, and the 3 administrators, who were all good honorable men, it could happen to anyone .
Its time .
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2019
Unholy Triangle At PSU: The Media, Prosecutors And Plaintiff's Lawyers
image: https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qjQKbESb...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+6.45.02+AM.png
By Ralph Cipriano
for BigTrial.net
Alexander H. Lindsay Jr. was happy to read the formerly confidential report done by seven Penn State trustees cataloging the many faults and failures of the Louis Freeh Report.
"We agree with the substance of the [trustees'] report" on Freeh, Lindsay said. "But it doesn't go far enough."
Lindsay, a former Butler County assistant district attorney and a former assistant U.S. Attorney under Dick Thornburg, is the long-suffering defense lawyer for Jerry Sandusky. His review of the Freeh Report is far more succinct than the 113-page trustees' review.
"It's total fiction from top to bottom," Lindsay said about the Freeh Report, which the NCAA used as the basis for imposing draconian sanctions on Penn State. Lindsay has the same view of the 2011 grand jury presentment, a report that had to invent a lurid rape in the showers of an imaginary child to brand his client forever as a raging, serial pedophile.
"They're all wrong," Lindsay said about the twin works of fiction issued by Freeh and the attorney general's office still venerated by the media. But in the view of Lindsay, a lone voice in the wilderness, his guy is totally innocent. And, Lindsay will tell you, Jerry and his loyal wife, Dottie, also happen to be "two of the bravest and most courageous people I have ever known."
Ask Lindsay how an innocent man winds up in jail, and he cites the work of "an unholy triangle of forces that push these things ahead [in lurid, high profile media cases] and result in false convictions."
He's talking about the convergence of a hysterical media, overzealous prosecutors, and hungry plaintiff's lawyers. All of this was on vivid display at Penn State, as Lindsay is about to explain.
The Unholy Triangle
When a public figure is charged with a lurid crime such as the sexual abuse of children, Lindsay said, "the media are off to the races." They can be counted on to report a "salacious" view of the story, Lindsay said, elevating hysteria and sensationalism over truth and rational thought.
Especially when they are being fed by "overzealous, over aggressive prosecutors who want to make the case," Lindsay said. The prosecutors go to work to convict the accused in the court of public opinion, before the case ever goes to trial. They are typically aided by willing dupes and accomplices in the media, who are all too happy to run with sensational prosecutorial leaks that may or may not be true.
The final ingredient of the unholy triangle, Lindsay said, are "plaintiff's lawyers who look at the diocese [of Philadelphia] or Penn State as a gold mine because it's easy money, and they're so vulnerable."
"I'm a plaintiff's lawyer," Lindsay said, so he fully understands the lure of suing the church or Penn State.
But as far as playing defense goes, whether it's the church or the university, "They're not so much concerned with the truth but with damage control," Lindsay said. "And these plaintiff's lawyers are suing for money, and the plaintiff's lawyers are loving it."
That's exactly what happened at Penn State. Let's start with overzealous prosecutors, who in this case, were not above inventing crimes to put a defendant in jail.
To turn Sandusky into a serial child rapist, and Paterno into an accomplice, the prosecutors had to invent a lurid rape in the showers of a 10-year-old boy, a crime that for two decades has gone without a known victim. The prosecutors did it by twisting the words of Mike McQueary, a confused dope with a known gambling problem and an affinity for sending pictures of his penis to women not his wife.
A guy like that would be putty in the hands of scheming prosecutors and cops. Even though McQueary subsequently stated in an email to a lead prosecutor and the lead investigator in the case a week after the erroneous grand jury report was issued that he never really saw a rape in the showers. The written response of the prosecutor: keep quiet.
Armed with a deliberately false document, the hysterical media went nuts, especially when they had a chance to crucify Joe Paterno, a former Republican Mr. Clean, as an enabler of an assistant coach on an imaginary rape spree. Instead of carrying torches and pitchforks the media mob was armed with cameras and microphones.
In the Sandusky case, Lindsay said, the grand jury "becomes a weapon for an unscrupulous prosecutor." The many leaks from that grand jury, according to state law, should have been investigated by the appointment of a special prosecutor, Lindsay said. But it never happened. In Sandusky's case, Lindsay lamented, all the "safeguards that are built into the grand jury process have been stood on its head."
Finally, the greedy plaintiff's lawyers showed up at Penn State, in search of millions of dollars in easy money. They would not be disappointed.
Sadly, I know how this game works. In the case of the Philadelphia archdiocese, a former altar boy named "Billy Doe" -- real name Danny Gallagher -- made up a story about being sexually abused in serial attacks by two priests and a schoolteacher.
In the criminal courts, Gallagher not only sent three innocent men to jail -- the alleged attackers -- but also Msgr. William J. Lynn, who was falsely accused of not monitoring an abusive priest.
And in the civil courts, thanks to the work of Slade McLaughlin, a Philadelphia plaintiff's lawyer, the altar boy -- a junkie hustler, serial liar and total fraud -- collected $5 million in what was supposed to be a confidential settlement from the Catholic Church.
Gallagher got his cash without offering a single shred of evidence to support his allegations. Indeed, as the Philly D.A.'s former lead detective in that case, Joe Walsh, subsequently came forward to testify in court, all of the evidence, including the testimony of the altar boy's parents -- a cop and a nurse -- and the testimony of Gallagher's older brother -- an altar boy and sexton at the same church -- contradicted Billy Doe's cockamamie and constantly changing stories of abuse.
That's how easy it is for an alleged victim to collect in a high-profile sex abuse case preferably targeting a public figure, or a Catholic priest. You don't need any evidence, all you need is an alleged victim willing to tell a story.
image: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-amE36oAR...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+9.07.01+AM.png
The same Slade McLaughlin who collected $5 million for a complete fraud in Philadelphia, represented a dozen of the alleged victims at Penn State. In all, 36 alleged victims were awarded a total of $118 million -- $3.3 million each.
The money was approved by a board of trustees at Penn State that, according to a lawsuit filed against the university by its own insurance carrier, did little or nothing to vet any of the stories of the alleged victims.
And what a motley crew they were, a conga line of Billy Does. They came with constantly changing stories, thanks to the work of their therapists who presumably used hypnosis and guided imagery to recover supposedly long-buried [and constantly changing] memories of abuse.
A third of these future millionaires had criminal records. But for the plaintiff's lawyers at Penn State, it was easy money. Their clients didn't even have to give up their real names on the way to the bank.
A Moral Lecture From Mr. Integrity
At Penn State, with the trustees' report out of the barn, the people who had been stonewalling the release of the report for nine months shifted to damage control in their best efforts to continue the cover up.
In the wake of the leak of the trustees' report on Louis Freeh, Mark Dambly, the former ruffian and cocaine dealer who is the president of the Penn State board of trustees, called the release of the report card on Freeh a "reprehensible" step that would supposedly undermine a culture where Penn State employees can confidentially report wrongdoing.
Wrong, Mr. Dambly. The release of the report done by the Penn State trustees affirms a culture where Penn State employees can continue to confidentially report wrongdoing. But if something reported confidentially turns out to be actually wrong, to right that wrong, it may be necessary to lay those facts out in the open.
In this case, the report by the minority trustees outed the majority trustees, now led by Dambly, for their collusion, political interference, and ultimate dereliction of duty in their handling of the supposedly independent investigation done by Louis Freeh. Sorry if you were on the wrong end of that, Mr. Dambly.
As the guy who for nine months who led the cover up of the trustees' report, Dambly, a known scoundrel, predictably retreated to the high moral ground. He was enabled by his accomplices in the media who have their own asses to cover. Like Susan Snyder of The Philadelphia Inquirer, but more on that later.
Reporters may have given Dambly cover, but the former drug dealer wasn't safe on twitter. In response to Dambly's statement, "PSUpittsfordNY" posted a video clip of Dambly lying his ass off when reporter Gary Sinderson confronted Dambly about his criminal past.
image: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gK1EKVAu...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+7.54.34+AM.png
It's great stuff because in 2012, Dambly was a Penn state trustee who had supported criminal background checks for university employees. Reporter Sinderson of WJAC Johnstown Channel 6 turned the tables on Dambly in a video posted on youtube.com by asking if he had been arrested in 1979.
"I'm not aware of that," Dambly responded twice on camera. As he was walking away, in unreleased video recorded by the TV station, Sinderson asked Dambly about his alleged association with members of an infamous cocaine ring.
"I don't recall that either," Dambly said.
When asked by his fellow trustees during an executive session about his arrest, Dambly replied that it was "undocumented." But it was documented. And there are law enforcement types around who still remember Dambly's role in the cocaine ring.
First, the arrest. Back in 1979, on the weekend of a Penn State-Temple football game, Dambly was involved in an incident where three students got beaten up during a fight in the Pugh Street parking garage.
Dambly was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. If convicted, he faced a fine of $2,500 and a year in jail. Dambly promptly hired R. Bruce Manchester of Bellefonte, PA as his lawyer. On Nov. 17, 1979, Manchester sent Dambly a letter telling him he had been offered a plea bargain by the Centre County District Attorney's Office that included pleading guilty to disorderly conduct, spending five days in jail, and paying a $200 fine. It was a deal that Dambly took.
"By pleading guilty you will have a police record which may have to be disclosed on various occasions in the future," Manchester wrote Dambly. "You stated to me on Wednesday the 28th that your career goal is to be a real estate broker."
TV reporter Sinderson also asked Dambly about the infamous "Dr. Snow" yuppie cocaine ring run by Larry Lavin, then a student at the University of Pennsylvania dental school, that operated between 1978 and 1984.
In 1986, a judge sentenced three dentists to jail for their roles in the ring that the FBI said was then the largest known cocaine distribution enterprise in the history of the Philadelphia area, grossing up to $5 million a month.
A retired investigator who worked the Lavin case and sought anonymity said that a former FBI agent, Leo Pedrotty, who has since died, became Dambly's handler after Dambly decided to wear a wire to get himself out of a legal jam.
"Pedrotty was responsible for placing the recording equipment on Dambly and monitoring the results as Dambly secretly recorded conversations about the massive drug operation," the investigator wrote. "In exchange, Dambly would not be prosecuted and there would be no asset forfeiture action."
And this is the guy who's giving us a moral lecture about what constitutes being "reprehensible" in the Penn State scandal.
Accomplices In the Media
image: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uqda_lVV...s320/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+7.55.16+AM.png
Finally, to keep up with the unending work of accomplices in the media, we come to one Susan Snyder, staff writer for The Philadelphia Inquirer.
I happen to know from my own sources that Snyder, who allegedly covers higher education, has turned a deaf ear for years on requests to look into what really happened at Penn State. Nothing to see here folks. We got it right the first time.
But when I wrote a blog post earlier this week about WJAC-TV having a copy of the trustees report on Freeh, I mentioned that the Inquirer also had the report, but was sitting on it.
Snyder and her newspaper promptly sprang into action. Or should I call it reverse action.
Her story is a textbook example of media bias and slanted news coverage. She and her newspaper should be ashamed of themselves, but I know from long experience that they fancy themselves as above all that.
Snyder begins her "objective" piece by noting in the lead paragraph that the report is the work of "longstanding critics" of Freeh.
Holding her nose, she then prints one paragraph of quotes from the trustees' report that dares to be critical of Freeh.
Then, in paragraph Three, she writes: "The report, signed by seven alumni-elected members of the school's board of trustees, attempts to make its case by highlighting emails and handwritten comments by investigators that seem to question the report's conclusions and Freeh's motivation, evidence that they say was ignored or never shared, a list of key people Freeh's team never interviewed, and questioned the interviewers couldn't answer."
Paragraph Four: "In many ways, it's a summary of claims that Penn State defenders have made in the years since the scandal broke, this time with material from Fresh's investigation that they say bolsters their view. For years, they have challenged prosecutors' suggestions that head football coach Joe Paterno and school administrators may have ignored a serial predator in their midst. They seethed at the NCAA sanctions, fumed at Fresh's report, and ran en masse for alumni seats on the board."
Paragraph Five: "When they got elected, they sued the university and won access to the hundreds of thousands of interviews notes and documents that Freeh, also a former judge, used to prepare his report, then spent hundreds of hours poring over them."
Paragraph Six: Penn State's leadership criticized the release of the report, and Freeh dismissed it as inconsequential, biased and inaccurate, a misguided attempt to turn back the clock and exonerate the university and its former leaders -- since convicted of endangerment -- for not stopping Sandusky years earlier.
Paragraph Seven: "The deniers continue to embarrass the many thousands of outstanding Penn State students, faculty and alumni by blindly disregarding the uncontroverted facts in favor of a misguided agenda," Freeh said in a statement.
Paragraph Eight: "It's release continues what has been an unending battle for those who believe that the former Penn State leaders perhaps made some misjudgments about how to handle Sandusky but did nothing intentionally wrong, and that a vaunted football program was scapegoated."
Again, this is a shining example of outrageously biased and slanted journalism, partisan commentary, reverse spin and damage control dressed up as a news story. By somebody, who, if what the trustees wrote was true, has a conflict of interest because she and her newspaper blew the story.
In the first eight paragraphs of her story, Snyder quotes the critics for precisely one paragraph, while spending a total of six paragraphs impugning the alleged motives of those same critics. Then she spends one paragraph allowing Freeh to defend himself, and another paragraph quoting university "leadership" who were actively engaged in covering up the report.
<tbody>
</tbody>Instead of reporting the news, she's editorializing. And in classic fashion, she's impugning the motives of the people who wrote the report, rather than deal with the evidence that the report presents.
On twitter, and in an email, I asked Snyder how, as "one reporter to another," she could ignore that the trustees wrote about a contemporaneous but previously unknown federal investigation on the Penn State campus. A federal investigation that concluded that the only witness to the alleged shower rape, Mike McQueary, wasn't credible, and that there was no official cover up at Penn State.
The federal investigation, done in 2012, was disclosed in 2017 after the filing of a Freedom of Information request. The investigation was conducted for six months on the Penn State campus by former NCIS Special Agent and cold case investigator John Snedden, who wrote a 110-page report posted online.
Snedden's report, and many comments he made in two interviews with Big Trial, were quoted extensively by the trustees in their report. But Snyder willfully ignored it. She also did not respond on twitter to my comments, or to an email I sent her.
In her story, Snyder, in full cover up mode, gave Freeh a platform for a couple more paragraphs to take shots at his critics, such as calling them "a gang of deniers" who wrote a "misguided, tilted, dishonest and biased" report.
Of course, she didn't ask Freeh any hard questions, like whether he really did have a conflict of interest, as the trustees asserted in their report. The evidence of this was disclosed in Fresh's own internal emails, published in the trustees report, where he openly stated that he wanted to use the Penn State investigation as a stepping stone to become the "go-to investigator" for the scandal-plagued NCAA.
Snyder also didn't ask Freeh, as I did last year, about the many emails in the so-called Freeh source materials that show that former deputy Attorney General Frank Fina was routinely leaking grand jury secrets, along with grand jury transcripts, to Freeh and his investigators, in blatant and repeated violations of state law.
When I asked Freeh as a private citizen while he was investigating Penn State, to explain how he and his investigators were authorized to have access to grand jury secrets, he declined comment.
But Snyder wasn't going to ask Freeh any hard questions; instead she published verbatim a four-page statement he put out impugning the messengers.
Why? Because Snyder is no objective journalist on this story. She's a partisan actively involved in carrying water for the prosecutors, Louis Freeh and Penn State trustees, all of whom are still actively engaged in an ongoing cover up of their own collusion, misconduct, and dereliction of duty in the scandal behind the scandal at Penn State.
It's shameful but sadly, it's nothing new for the Inquirer. In the Billy Doe scandal, as I have previously mentioned, after publishing more than 60 news stories and editorials that presented Billy as a legitimate victim of sex abuse, and castigating the church and the accused defendants, the Inquirer has never written one story that tells its readers it was a phony prosecution, and that the accused were innocent. Even after the D.A.'s office let the last innocent guy sent to jail -- a Catholic schoolteacher falsely convicted of child rape -- out nearly a dozen years early.
This time, in another sex abuse case that they blew to hell, instead of ignoring the truth, the Inky is actively involved in leading the cover up. They're attacking the messengers and shielding the miscreants, to ensure that the truth never comes out.
Shameful and corrupt.
Read more at http://www.bigtrial.net/2019/02/an-unholy-triangle.html#a5adpihOYOtmaPjS.99
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2019
Unholy Triangle At PSU: The Media, Prosecutors And Plaintiff's Lawyers
image: https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qjQKbESb...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+6.45.02+AM.png
for BigTrial.net
Alexander H. Lindsay Jr. was happy to read the formerly confidential report done by seven Penn State trustees cataloging the many faults and failures of the Louis Freeh Report.
"We agree with the substance of the [trustees'] report" on Freeh, Lindsay said. "But it doesn't go far enough."
Lindsay, a former Butler County assistant district attorney and a former assistant U.S. Attorney under Dick Thornburg, is the long-suffering defense lawyer for Jerry Sandusky. His review of the Freeh Report is far more succinct than the 113-page trustees' review.
"It's total fiction from top to bottom," Lindsay said about the Freeh Report, which the NCAA used as the basis for imposing draconian sanctions on Penn State. Lindsay has the same view of the 2011 grand jury presentment, a report that had to invent a lurid rape in the showers of an imaginary child to brand his client forever as a raging, serial pedophile.
"They're all wrong," Lindsay said about the twin works of fiction issued by Freeh and the attorney general's office still venerated by the media. But in the view of Lindsay, a lone voice in the wilderness, his guy is totally innocent. And, Lindsay will tell you, Jerry and his loyal wife, Dottie, also happen to be "two of the bravest and most courageous people I have ever known."
Ask Lindsay how an innocent man winds up in jail, and he cites the work of "an unholy triangle of forces that push these things ahead [in lurid, high profile media cases] and result in false convictions."
He's talking about the convergence of a hysterical media, overzealous prosecutors, and hungry plaintiff's lawyers. All of this was on vivid display at Penn State, as Lindsay is about to explain.
The Unholy Triangle
When a public figure is charged with a lurid crime such as the sexual abuse of children, Lindsay said, "the media are off to the races." They can be counted on to report a "salacious" view of the story, Lindsay said, elevating hysteria and sensationalism over truth and rational thought.
Especially when they are being fed by "overzealous, over aggressive prosecutors who want to make the case," Lindsay said. The prosecutors go to work to convict the accused in the court of public opinion, before the case ever goes to trial. They are typically aided by willing dupes and accomplices in the media, who are all too happy to run with sensational prosecutorial leaks that may or may not be true.
The final ingredient of the unholy triangle, Lindsay said, are "plaintiff's lawyers who look at the diocese [of Philadelphia] or Penn State as a gold mine because it's easy money, and they're so vulnerable."
"I'm a plaintiff's lawyer," Lindsay said, so he fully understands the lure of suing the church or Penn State.
But as far as playing defense goes, whether it's the church or the university, "They're not so much concerned with the truth but with damage control," Lindsay said. "And these plaintiff's lawyers are suing for money, and the plaintiff's lawyers are loving it."
That's exactly what happened at Penn State. Let's start with overzealous prosecutors, who in this case, were not above inventing crimes to put a defendant in jail.
To turn Sandusky into a serial child rapist, and Paterno into an accomplice, the prosecutors had to invent a lurid rape in the showers of a 10-year-old boy, a crime that for two decades has gone without a known victim. The prosecutors did it by twisting the words of Mike McQueary, a confused dope with a known gambling problem and an affinity for sending pictures of his penis to women not his wife.
A guy like that would be putty in the hands of scheming prosecutors and cops. Even though McQueary subsequently stated in an email to a lead prosecutor and the lead investigator in the case a week after the erroneous grand jury report was issued that he never really saw a rape in the showers. The written response of the prosecutor: keep quiet.
Armed with a deliberately false document, the hysterical media went nuts, especially when they had a chance to crucify Joe Paterno, a former Republican Mr. Clean, as an enabler of an assistant coach on an imaginary rape spree. Instead of carrying torches and pitchforks the media mob was armed with cameras and microphones.
In the Sandusky case, Lindsay said, the grand jury "becomes a weapon for an unscrupulous prosecutor." The many leaks from that grand jury, according to state law, should have been investigated by the appointment of a special prosecutor, Lindsay said. But it never happened. In Sandusky's case, Lindsay lamented, all the "safeguards that are built into the grand jury process have been stood on its head."
Finally, the greedy plaintiff's lawyers showed up at Penn State, in search of millions of dollars in easy money. They would not be disappointed.
Sadly, I know how this game works. In the case of the Philadelphia archdiocese, a former altar boy named "Billy Doe" -- real name Danny Gallagher -- made up a story about being sexually abused in serial attacks by two priests and a schoolteacher.
In the criminal courts, Gallagher not only sent three innocent men to jail -- the alleged attackers -- but also Msgr. William J. Lynn, who was falsely accused of not monitoring an abusive priest.
And in the civil courts, thanks to the work of Slade McLaughlin, a Philadelphia plaintiff's lawyer, the altar boy -- a junkie hustler, serial liar and total fraud -- collected $5 million in what was supposed to be a confidential settlement from the Catholic Church.
Gallagher got his cash without offering a single shred of evidence to support his allegations. Indeed, as the Philly D.A.'s former lead detective in that case, Joe Walsh, subsequently came forward to testify in court, all of the evidence, including the testimony of the altar boy's parents -- a cop and a nurse -- and the testimony of Gallagher's older brother -- an altar boy and sexton at the same church -- contradicted Billy Doe's cockamamie and constantly changing stories of abuse.
That's how easy it is for an alleged victim to collect in a high-profile sex abuse case preferably targeting a public figure, or a Catholic priest. You don't need any evidence, all you need is an alleged victim willing to tell a story.
image: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-amE36oAR...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+9.07.01+AM.png
The money was approved by a board of trustees at Penn State that, according to a lawsuit filed against the university by its own insurance carrier, did little or nothing to vet any of the stories of the alleged victims.
And what a motley crew they were, a conga line of Billy Does. They came with constantly changing stories, thanks to the work of their therapists who presumably used hypnosis and guided imagery to recover supposedly long-buried [and constantly changing] memories of abuse.
A third of these future millionaires had criminal records. But for the plaintiff's lawyers at Penn State, it was easy money. Their clients didn't even have to give up their real names on the way to the bank.
A Moral Lecture From Mr. Integrity
At Penn State, with the trustees' report out of the barn, the people who had been stonewalling the release of the report for nine months shifted to damage control in their best efforts to continue the cover up.
In the wake of the leak of the trustees' report on Louis Freeh, Mark Dambly, the former ruffian and cocaine dealer who is the president of the Penn State board of trustees, called the release of the report card on Freeh a "reprehensible" step that would supposedly undermine a culture where Penn State employees can confidentially report wrongdoing.
Wrong, Mr. Dambly. The release of the report done by the Penn State trustees affirms a culture where Penn State employees can continue to confidentially report wrongdoing. But if something reported confidentially turns out to be actually wrong, to right that wrong, it may be necessary to lay those facts out in the open.
In this case, the report by the minority trustees outed the majority trustees, now led by Dambly, for their collusion, political interference, and ultimate dereliction of duty in their handling of the supposedly independent investigation done by Louis Freeh. Sorry if you were on the wrong end of that, Mr. Dambly.
As the guy who for nine months who led the cover up of the trustees' report, Dambly, a known scoundrel, predictably retreated to the high moral ground. He was enabled by his accomplices in the media who have their own asses to cover. Like Susan Snyder of The Philadelphia Inquirer, but more on that later.
Reporters may have given Dambly cover, but the former drug dealer wasn't safe on twitter. In response to Dambly's statement, "PSUpittsfordNY" posted a video clip of Dambly lying his ass off when reporter Gary Sinderson confronted Dambly about his criminal past.
image: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gK1EKVAu...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+7.54.34+AM.png
"I'm not aware of that," Dambly responded twice on camera. As he was walking away, in unreleased video recorded by the TV station, Sinderson asked Dambly about his alleged association with members of an infamous cocaine ring.
"I don't recall that either," Dambly said.
When asked by his fellow trustees during an executive session about his arrest, Dambly replied that it was "undocumented." But it was documented. And there are law enforcement types around who still remember Dambly's role in the cocaine ring.
First, the arrest. Back in 1979, on the weekend of a Penn State-Temple football game, Dambly was involved in an incident where three students got beaten up during a fight in the Pugh Street parking garage.
Dambly was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. If convicted, he faced a fine of $2,500 and a year in jail. Dambly promptly hired R. Bruce Manchester of Bellefonte, PA as his lawyer. On Nov. 17, 1979, Manchester sent Dambly a letter telling him he had been offered a plea bargain by the Centre County District Attorney's Office that included pleading guilty to disorderly conduct, spending five days in jail, and paying a $200 fine. It was a deal that Dambly took.
"By pleading guilty you will have a police record which may have to be disclosed on various occasions in the future," Manchester wrote Dambly. "You stated to me on Wednesday the 28th that your career goal is to be a real estate broker."
TV reporter Sinderson also asked Dambly about the infamous "Dr. Snow" yuppie cocaine ring run by Larry Lavin, then a student at the University of Pennsylvania dental school, that operated between 1978 and 1984.
In 1986, a judge sentenced three dentists to jail for their roles in the ring that the FBI said was then the largest known cocaine distribution enterprise in the history of the Philadelphia area, grossing up to $5 million a month.
A retired investigator who worked the Lavin case and sought anonymity said that a former FBI agent, Leo Pedrotty, who has since died, became Dambly's handler after Dambly decided to wear a wire to get himself out of a legal jam.
"Pedrotty was responsible for placing the recording equipment on Dambly and monitoring the results as Dambly secretly recorded conversations about the massive drug operation," the investigator wrote. "In exchange, Dambly would not be prosecuted and there would be no asset forfeiture action."
And this is the guy who's giving us a moral lecture about what constitutes being "reprehensible" in the Penn State scandal.
Accomplices In the Media
image: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uqda_lVV...s320/Screen+Shot+2019-02-14+at+7.55.16+AM.png
I happen to know from my own sources that Snyder, who allegedly covers higher education, has turned a deaf ear for years on requests to look into what really happened at Penn State. Nothing to see here folks. We got it right the first time.
But when I wrote a blog post earlier this week about WJAC-TV having a copy of the trustees report on Freeh, I mentioned that the Inquirer also had the report, but was sitting on it.
Snyder and her newspaper promptly sprang into action. Or should I call it reverse action.
Her story is a textbook example of media bias and slanted news coverage. She and her newspaper should be ashamed of themselves, but I know from long experience that they fancy themselves as above all that.
Snyder begins her "objective" piece by noting in the lead paragraph that the report is the work of "longstanding critics" of Freeh.
Holding her nose, she then prints one paragraph of quotes from the trustees' report that dares to be critical of Freeh.
Then, in paragraph Three, she writes: "The report, signed by seven alumni-elected members of the school's board of trustees, attempts to make its case by highlighting emails and handwritten comments by investigators that seem to question the report's conclusions and Freeh's motivation, evidence that they say was ignored or never shared, a list of key people Freeh's team never interviewed, and questioned the interviewers couldn't answer."
Paragraph Four: "In many ways, it's a summary of claims that Penn State defenders have made in the years since the scandal broke, this time with material from Fresh's investigation that they say bolsters their view. For years, they have challenged prosecutors' suggestions that head football coach Joe Paterno and school administrators may have ignored a serial predator in their midst. They seethed at the NCAA sanctions, fumed at Fresh's report, and ran en masse for alumni seats on the board."
Paragraph Five: "When they got elected, they sued the university and won access to the hundreds of thousands of interviews notes and documents that Freeh, also a former judge, used to prepare his report, then spent hundreds of hours poring over them."
Paragraph Six: Penn State's leadership criticized the release of the report, and Freeh dismissed it as inconsequential, biased and inaccurate, a misguided attempt to turn back the clock and exonerate the university and its former leaders -- since convicted of endangerment -- for not stopping Sandusky years earlier.
Paragraph Seven: "The deniers continue to embarrass the many thousands of outstanding Penn State students, faculty and alumni by blindly disregarding the uncontroverted facts in favor of a misguided agenda," Freeh said in a statement.
Paragraph Eight: "It's release continues what has been an unending battle for those who believe that the former Penn State leaders perhaps made some misjudgments about how to handle Sandusky but did nothing intentionally wrong, and that a vaunted football program was scapegoated."
Again, this is a shining example of outrageously biased and slanted journalism, partisan commentary, reverse spin and damage control dressed up as a news story. By somebody, who, if what the trustees wrote was true, has a conflict of interest because she and her newspaper blew the story.
In the first eight paragraphs of her story, Snyder quotes the critics for precisely one paragraph, while spending a total of six paragraphs impugning the alleged motives of those same critics. Then she spends one paragraph allowing Freeh to defend himself, and another paragraph quoting university "leadership" who were actively engaged in covering up the report.
image: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ICZe6J0T...s400/Screen+Shot+2019-02-12+at+8.41.14+AM.png
|
| Two Stories The Inky Blew To Hell: Sandusky & Lynn |
<tbody>
</tbody>
On twitter, and in an email, I asked Snyder how, as "one reporter to another," she could ignore that the trustees wrote about a contemporaneous but previously unknown federal investigation on the Penn State campus. A federal investigation that concluded that the only witness to the alleged shower rape, Mike McQueary, wasn't credible, and that there was no official cover up at Penn State.
The federal investigation, done in 2012, was disclosed in 2017 after the filing of a Freedom of Information request. The investigation was conducted for six months on the Penn State campus by former NCIS Special Agent and cold case investigator John Snedden, who wrote a 110-page report posted online.
Snedden's report, and many comments he made in two interviews with Big Trial, were quoted extensively by the trustees in their report. But Snyder willfully ignored it. She also did not respond on twitter to my comments, or to an email I sent her.
In her story, Snyder, in full cover up mode, gave Freeh a platform for a couple more paragraphs to take shots at his critics, such as calling them "a gang of deniers" who wrote a "misguided, tilted, dishonest and biased" report.
Of course, she didn't ask Freeh any hard questions, like whether he really did have a conflict of interest, as the trustees asserted in their report. The evidence of this was disclosed in Fresh's own internal emails, published in the trustees report, where he openly stated that he wanted to use the Penn State investigation as a stepping stone to become the "go-to investigator" for the scandal-plagued NCAA.
Snyder also didn't ask Freeh, as I did last year, about the many emails in the so-called Freeh source materials that show that former deputy Attorney General Frank Fina was routinely leaking grand jury secrets, along with grand jury transcripts, to Freeh and his investigators, in blatant and repeated violations of state law.
When I asked Freeh as a private citizen while he was investigating Penn State, to explain how he and his investigators were authorized to have access to grand jury secrets, he declined comment.
But Snyder wasn't going to ask Freeh any hard questions; instead she published verbatim a four-page statement he put out impugning the messengers.
Why? Because Snyder is no objective journalist on this story. She's a partisan actively involved in carrying water for the prosecutors, Louis Freeh and Penn State trustees, all of whom are still actively engaged in an ongoing cover up of their own collusion, misconduct, and dereliction of duty in the scandal behind the scandal at Penn State.
It's shameful but sadly, it's nothing new for the Inquirer. In the Billy Doe scandal, as I have previously mentioned, after publishing more than 60 news stories and editorials that presented Billy as a legitimate victim of sex abuse, and castigating the church and the accused defendants, the Inquirer has never written one story that tells its readers it was a phony prosecution, and that the accused were innocent. Even after the D.A.'s office let the last innocent guy sent to jail -- a Catholic schoolteacher falsely convicted of child rape -- out nearly a dozen years early.
This time, in another sex abuse case that they blew to hell, instead of ignoring the truth, the Inky is actively involved in leading the cover up. They're attacking the messengers and shielding the miscreants, to ensure that the truth never comes out.
Shameful and corrupt.
Read more at http://www.bigtrial.net/2019/02/an-unholy-triangle.html#a5adpihOYOtmaPjS.99
[FONT="]Monday, February 11, 2019[/FONT]
[FONT="]Penn State Cover Up Ends With Leak Of Louis Freeh's Top-Secret Report Card; He Flunked And Penn State Wants Their $8.3 Million Back
By Ralph Cipriano
for BigTrial.net[/FONT]
http://www.bigtrial.net/2019/02/penn...aking.html?m=1
[FONT="]Penn State Cover Up Ends With Leak Of Louis Freeh's Top-Secret Report Card; He Flunked And Penn State Wants Their $8.3 Million Back
By Ralph Cipriano
for BigTrial.net[/FONT]
http://www.bigtrial.net/2019/02/penn...aking.html?m=1
of course. Any person with a half a brain knows this
https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/ma...the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative/
Malcolm Gladwell Interview: His New Book Blows Apart the News Media’s ‘Penn State Scandal’ Narrative
By John ZieglerSep 9th, 2019, 9:41 am
80 Comments
<iframe title="Twitter Tweet Button" class="twitter-share-button twitter-share-button-rendered twitter-tweet-button" id="twitter-widget-0" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.097c1f5038f9e8a0d62a39a892838d66.en.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&related=TheBraiser%2CStyleite%2CGeekosystem%2CSportsGrid%2CGossipCop%2CTheMarySue%2CTheJaneDough&size=m&text=Malcolm%20Gladwell%20Interview%3A%20His%20New%20Book%20Blows%20Apart%20the%20News%20Media%27s%20%27Penn%20State%20Scandal%27%20Narrative&time=1568054467987&type=share&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&via=mediaite" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="width: 61px; height: 20px; visibility: visible; position: static;" allowtransparency="true" data-url="https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/malcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative/"></iframe>
<!-- <iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&layout=box_count&show-faces=false&action=like&width=51&font=arial&colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" id="facebook-like-inner"></iframe> --> <iframe name="f36218078b9e09e" width="1000" height="1000" title="fb:share_button Facebook Social Plugin" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/share_button.php?app_id=&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D44%23cb%3Dfa084c070d49ea%26domain%3Dwww.mediaite.com%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.mediaite.com%252Ff23250e0a74a158%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=0&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&layout=button&locale=en_US&sdk=joey" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="true" style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; width: 59px; height: 20px; visibility: visible;" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe>
On Tuesday, best-selling author, intellectual and popular podcaster Malcolm Gladwell is out with a new book, Talking to Strangers. In it, there is a chapter devoted to reexamining the so-called Penn State/Joe Paterno/Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal, which shocked the world when it became one of the biggest news stories of the century in November of 2011.
This is particularly significant to me because, after eventually becoming convinced — by actually speaking directly to most of the people at the real heart of the case — that almost nothing the news media told us about it was true, I have (foolishly) devoted much of the last eight years of my life to finding out what really did happen in that saga. Gladwell, who contacted me more than a year ago while researching the subject, uses an important piece of my investigation in justifying why he has shifted his position, and now believes that Penn State leadership was totally innocent, and can no longer say with any confidence that even Sandusky himself is guilty.
It is not hyperbole to say that there are few other media figures who have taken more brutally unfair abuse and ridicule from the public and others in the media — almost none of whom have even 1/100[SUP]th[/SUP] my knowledge of the case — than I have on this story. It began when I started defending Paterno right after the scandal broke. Then, as my exploration got much deeper, I finally concluded in 2014 (voiced on a major Today Show appearance in which then-host Matt Lauer politely declared my controversial position career-ending), very much against my own self-interest, that, believe it or not, even Sandusky is a clearly innocent man.
All I have ever asked is that someone who is part of the elite media’s exclusive club have the courage to look at the facts of the case with an open mind and understand the unique circumstances of the unprecedented moral panic that gripped State College, PA and the national news media at that time. Gladwell is not the first to do so (a couple of others have intended to publish a revisionist history of the story, but have been effectively censored by a media establishment intensely invested in the original narrative) but he is the first to carry out the mission all the way to publication.
For these reasons, I was eager to interview Gladwell for my World According to Zig podcast and he generously gave me an hour of his time. The result is a discussion that should be required listening for everyone who ever covered the story, as well as anyone who cares about the truth of such an important matter.
<iframe name="google_ads_iframe_/18190176/AdThrive_Content_2/5ac64c79fdf4d60603abe6a5_0" width="728" height="90" title="3rd party ad content" id="google_ads_iframe_/18190176/AdThrive_Content_2/5ac64c79fdf4d60603abe6a5_0" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; vertical-align: bottom;" sandbox="allow-forms allow-pointer-lock allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation" data-forced-sandbox="true" data-google-container-id="d" data-load-complete="true" data-integralas-id-4af74823-eb29-25d1-a880-13edad1c657e="" data-integralas-id-ebfc8dfe-e8c5-a0c6-89d9-ddb24199a126=""></iframe>
The new “compelling” evidence to which Gladwell refers in the book has, he says, “convinced” him that the date of the central episode of the entire scandal — where then Penn State graduate assistant Mike McQueary allegedly witnessed anal rape in a Penn State shower — is still so catastrophically wrong that it fundamentally changes our understanding of the entire timeline. While complicated, we agreed that I have proven from every conceivable angle of this case — including the prosecution’s own witnesses — that McQueary did not urgently report this incident to Paterno the morning after it happened, but instead waited six weeks to do so. And in my opinion, only was provoked to go see his legendary head coach because a full-time job he badly wanted had just opened up the previous day.
When understood in the context of other evidence the media never told you about — including the many exculpatory statements of the alleged victim that night, who never even testified at trial — it is my strong belief that McQueary never even thought he witnessed any sort of sexual assault until desperate investigators, armed with a fatally-flawed allegation from one accuser, manipulated him a full ten years later. From there, if you understand the reality of the full case, everything else falls apart like a house of cards, especially against Paterno and the three former Penn State administrators who were all convicted of misdemeanors and inexplicably sentenced to prison (former Penn State president Graham Spanier is still fighting to remain free as Pennsylvania appeals a federal court throwing out his conviction).
Gladwell and I go into great detail on the issue of the date and our slightly differing interpretations of what this new timeline actually means. Here are some of Gladwell’s key quotes from the extensive interview, which can be heard at this link:
Having lived this case for so long, and having seen the media’s rampant malpractice up close, it is my conclusion that (because of the toxic nature of the subject matter and the huge number of chips the media placed on this narrative from the very first day the story broke) this will never actually happen. But I remain committed to trying until there is officially no hope. I still have a ton of important evidence which has never been released (including the only interview ever done with convicted PSU administrator Gary Schultz and Sandusky’s mind-blowing medical records, both of which should, in a rational world, destroy the entire case) and almost all the work for a career-making story has already been done — work I am more than ready to hand over to the right mainstream news reporter.
I am even willing to make this extraordinary deal. My many critics in the media can fully blame me for why they blew this story (after all, if I was a celebrity, or at least part of their club, they surely would have given my investigation a fair hearing long ago) if they just let the public know all the facts in a fair manner.
That is all I have ever wanted in this case. Unfortunately, in this modern media era, such a simple request is likely unrealistic.
John Ziegler is a senior columnist for Mediaite. He hosts a weekly podcast focusing on news media issues and is documentary filmmaker. You can follow him on Twitter at @ZigManFreud or email him at johnz@mediaite.com
- “There is no way Joe Paterno even belongs in this conversation. Everyone should agree he was treated shamefully and that his good name needs to be restored.”
https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/ma...the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative/
Malcolm Gladwell Interview: His New Book Blows Apart the News Media’s ‘Penn State Scandal’ Narrative
By John ZieglerSep 9th, 2019, 9:41 am
80 Comments
<iframe title="Twitter Tweet Button" class="twitter-share-button twitter-share-button-rendered twitter-tweet-button" id="twitter-widget-0" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.097c1f5038f9e8a0d62a39a892838d66.en.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&related=TheBraiser%2CStyleite%2CGeekosystem%2CSportsGrid%2CGossipCop%2CTheMarySue%2CTheJaneDough&size=m&text=Malcolm%20Gladwell%20Interview%3A%20His%20New%20Book%20Blows%20Apart%20the%20News%20Media%27s%20%27Penn%20State%20Scandal%27%20Narrative&time=1568054467987&type=share&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&via=mediaite" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="width: 61px; height: 20px; visibility: visible; position: static;" allowtransparency="true" data-url="https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/malcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative/"></iframe>
<!-- <iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&layout=box_count&show-faces=false&action=like&width=51&font=arial&colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" id="facebook-like-inner"></iframe> --> <iframe name="f36218078b9e09e" width="1000" height="1000" title="fb:share_button Facebook Social Plugin" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/share_button.php?app_id=&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D44%23cb%3Dfa084c070d49ea%26domain%3Dwww.mediaite.com%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.mediaite.com%252Ff23250e0a74a158%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=0&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fopinion%2Fmalcolm-gladwell-interview-his-new-book-blows-apart-the-news-medias-penn-state-scandal-narrative%2F&layout=button&locale=en_US&sdk=joey" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="true" style="border: currentColor; border-image: none; width: 59px; height: 20px; visibility: visible;" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe>
On Tuesday, best-selling author, intellectual and popular podcaster Malcolm Gladwell is out with a new book, Talking to Strangers. In it, there is a chapter devoted to reexamining the so-called Penn State/Joe Paterno/Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal, which shocked the world when it became one of the biggest news stories of the century in November of 2011.
This is particularly significant to me because, after eventually becoming convinced — by actually speaking directly to most of the people at the real heart of the case — that almost nothing the news media told us about it was true, I have (foolishly) devoted much of the last eight years of my life to finding out what really did happen in that saga. Gladwell, who contacted me more than a year ago while researching the subject, uses an important piece of my investigation in justifying why he has shifted his position, and now believes that Penn State leadership was totally innocent, and can no longer say with any confidence that even Sandusky himself is guilty.
It is not hyperbole to say that there are few other media figures who have taken more brutally unfair abuse and ridicule from the public and others in the media — almost none of whom have even 1/100[SUP]th[/SUP] my knowledge of the case — than I have on this story. It began when I started defending Paterno right after the scandal broke. Then, as my exploration got much deeper, I finally concluded in 2014 (voiced on a major Today Show appearance in which then-host Matt Lauer politely declared my controversial position career-ending), very much against my own self-interest, that, believe it or not, even Sandusky is a clearly innocent man.
All I have ever asked is that someone who is part of the elite media’s exclusive club have the courage to look at the facts of the case with an open mind and understand the unique circumstances of the unprecedented moral panic that gripped State College, PA and the national news media at that time. Gladwell is not the first to do so (a couple of others have intended to publish a revisionist history of the story, but have been effectively censored by a media establishment intensely invested in the original narrative) but he is the first to carry out the mission all the way to publication.
For these reasons, I was eager to interview Gladwell for my World According to Zig podcast and he generously gave me an hour of his time. The result is a discussion that should be required listening for everyone who ever covered the story, as well as anyone who cares about the truth of such an important matter.
<iframe name="google_ads_iframe_/18190176/AdThrive_Content_2/5ac64c79fdf4d60603abe6a5_0" width="728" height="90" title="3rd party ad content" id="google_ads_iframe_/18190176/AdThrive_Content_2/5ac64c79fdf4d60603abe6a5_0" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; vertical-align: bottom;" sandbox="allow-forms allow-pointer-lock allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation" data-forced-sandbox="true" data-google-container-id="d" data-load-complete="true" data-integralas-id-4af74823-eb29-25d1-a880-13edad1c657e="" data-integralas-id-ebfc8dfe-e8c5-a0c6-89d9-ddb24199a126=""></iframe>
The new “compelling” evidence to which Gladwell refers in the book has, he says, “convinced” him that the date of the central episode of the entire scandal — where then Penn State graduate assistant Mike McQueary allegedly witnessed anal rape in a Penn State shower — is still so catastrophically wrong that it fundamentally changes our understanding of the entire timeline. While complicated, we agreed that I have proven from every conceivable angle of this case — including the prosecution’s own witnesses — that McQueary did not urgently report this incident to Paterno the morning after it happened, but instead waited six weeks to do so. And in my opinion, only was provoked to go see his legendary head coach because a full-time job he badly wanted had just opened up the previous day.
When understood in the context of other evidence the media never told you about — including the many exculpatory statements of the alleged victim that night, who never even testified at trial — it is my strong belief that McQueary never even thought he witnessed any sort of sexual assault until desperate investigators, armed with a fatally-flawed allegation from one accuser, manipulated him a full ten years later. From there, if you understand the reality of the full case, everything else falls apart like a house of cards, especially against Paterno and the three former Penn State administrators who were all convicted of misdemeanors and inexplicably sentenced to prison (former Penn State president Graham Spanier is still fighting to remain free as Pennsylvania appeals a federal court throwing out his conviction).
Gladwell and I go into great detail on the issue of the date and our slightly differing interpretations of what this new timeline actually means. Here are some of Gladwell’s key quotes from the extensive interview, which can be heard at this link:
- “There is no way Joe Paterno even belongs in this conversation. Everyone should agree he was treated shamefully and that his good name needs to be restored.”
- “I am ashamed to be part of a society which tried to put Graham Spanier in prison.”
- “We were way, way, way, way too quick to come to judgement about the Penn State leadership and on Joe Paterno, and way too quick to think that Mike McQueary’s account is cut and dry when, in fact, it’s not.”
- “Joe Paterno, Graham Spanier, Tim Curley, and Gary Schultz were the victims of a moral panic. It was crazy.”
- “The prosecution behaved egregiously in this case and continues to behave egregiously.”
- “The Freeh Report (conducted on the case on behalf of Penn State by former FBI Director Louis Freeh) is a whole other pile of crap.”
- The prosecution’s current date (their second official stab at it after originally incorrectly claiming it was March 1, 2002) for the McQueary episode, February 9, 2001, is “bullshit.”
- The news media’s total lack of curiosity in the real story of the “boy in the shower,” whom Gladwell correctly identifies in his book as then 13-year old Allan Myers, is “bizarre.”
- As for Sandusky’s guilt, Gladwell cautiously says, “I don’t know. The public should know that this is murky… This case is shrouded in doubt.” He adds that in reality it is, “the polar opposite of the Larry Nassar case,” when it has been portrayed by the media as very similar.
- In the news media, “There is kind of a group mentality that takes place in these cases, at least in the beginning.”
- “My hat is off to you John. I admire what you have done and I encourage others to look at it and reach their own conclusions… I think you are going to live to see at least some measure of vindication.”
Having lived this case for so long, and having seen the media’s rampant malpractice up close, it is my conclusion that (because of the toxic nature of the subject matter and the huge number of chips the media placed on this narrative from the very first day the story broke) this will never actually happen. But I remain committed to trying until there is officially no hope. I still have a ton of important evidence which has never been released (including the only interview ever done with convicted PSU administrator Gary Schultz and Sandusky’s mind-blowing medical records, both of which should, in a rational world, destroy the entire case) and almost all the work for a career-making story has already been done — work I am more than ready to hand over to the right mainstream news reporter.
I am even willing to make this extraordinary deal. My many critics in the media can fully blame me for why they blew this story (after all, if I was a celebrity, or at least part of their club, they surely would have given my investigation a fair hearing long ago) if they just let the public know all the facts in a fair manner.
That is all I have ever wanted in this case. Unfortunately, in this modern media era, such a simple request is likely unrealistic.
John Ziegler is a senior columnist for Mediaite. He hosts a weekly podcast focusing on news media issues and is documentary filmmaker. You can follow him on Twitter at @ZigManFreud or email him at johnz@mediaite.com
[h=1]This guilty piece of shit should get the electric chair
Investigation begins into new allegation against Jerry Sandusky[/h]
An investigation has begun into a new allegation of sexual abuse against imprisoned former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky.
According to the Centre Daily Times, Penn State police said someone came forward with an allegation of abuse between 2000 and 2010.
This incident report is the result of the university’s internal and external reporting procedures upon receipt of a new allegation of abuse by Jerry Sandusky,” police spokesperson Wyatt DuBois told the paper this week. “An investigation is ongoing and we have no further comment.”
Sandusky, 75, is serving what’s effectively a life sentence on 45 counts of child sexual abuse. He’s set to be back in court on Nov. 8 for a resentencing after he had appealed his conviction.
While that appeal largely failed, he did win the right to a new sentence on the grounds of improperly applied minimum sentences. Sandusky is currently serving a 30-60 year sentence after his 2012 conviction and it seems unlikely that his sentence will change significantly next week at his resentencing hearing.
Sandusky was a longtime defensive assistant under legendary coach Joe Paterno. He was the team’s defensive coordinator from 1977-99 before he retired and shifted his focus to his non-profit organization for at-risk youth. Numerous Sandusky victims were part of The Second Mile charity.
Sandusky was arrested in November of 2011 on over 50 counts of child molestation. His arrest led to the dismissal of Paterno before the coach’s death in 2012.
Former Penn State administrators were also charged for their roles relating to Sandusky’s crimes. The former athletic director and a former vice president for the school both pleaded guilty in 2017 to child endangerment charges.
Investigation begins into new allegation against Jerry Sandusky[/h]
An investigation has begun into a new allegation of sexual abuse against imprisoned former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky.
According to the Centre Daily Times, Penn State police said someone came forward with an allegation of abuse between 2000 and 2010.
This incident report is the result of the university’s internal and external reporting procedures upon receipt of a new allegation of abuse by Jerry Sandusky,” police spokesperson Wyatt DuBois told the paper this week. “An investigation is ongoing and we have no further comment.”
Sandusky, 75, is serving what’s effectively a life sentence on 45 counts of child sexual abuse. He’s set to be back in court on Nov. 8 for a resentencing after he had appealed his conviction.
While that appeal largely failed, he did win the right to a new sentence on the grounds of improperly applied minimum sentences. Sandusky is currently serving a 30-60 year sentence after his 2012 conviction and it seems unlikely that his sentence will change significantly next week at his resentencing hearing.
Sandusky was a longtime defensive assistant under legendary coach Joe Paterno. He was the team’s defensive coordinator from 1977-99 before he retired and shifted his focus to his non-profit organization for at-risk youth. Numerous Sandusky victims were part of The Second Mile charity.
Sandusky was arrested in November of 2011 on over 50 counts of child molestation. His arrest led to the dismissal of Paterno before the coach’s death in 2012.
Former Penn State administrators were also charged for their roles relating to Sandusky’s crimes. The former athletic director and a former vice president for the school both pleaded guilty in 2017 to child endangerment charges.
