Notice the mindless lemmings always screaming for more "gun control" are totally ignorant of any and all existing laws.
"We need background checks!!!"
We have background checks.
"Well, uhhhh, 12 guns is one too many...but 10 would be okay!"
Huh?
It's a clown show, which is fine for a political forum (always a few nuts expected among a group) but the Stuttering Clusterfuck of the Miserable Failure (or simply 'asshole' as the French now call him) believes and says THE EXACT THE SAME THINGS!
It's beyond embarrassing.
So apparently the guns used in the latest shooting turned out to be legal? Uh oh, bad news for the gun control Nazis.
No problem. Just move on to the next vapid talking point:
"Having a huge stash of guns is like a threat or something"ointer:
Liberalism is a gong show.
What?? You're weird. Gun nuts point out gun laws won't stop criminals from using illegal guns. Now it's a good thing for pro guns that legal guns were used?? Always comical to see you guys try to double side every issue.
I feel real comfortable that anybody with a pulse can buy as many guns and as much ammunition as they want legally. Yeah, that's good news.
Man joe.....you might need a break.
First, you'd probably be surprised who is against anyone owning any kind of gun. That's the ultimate progressive goal, and we've talked about why in the past.
Secondly, do you have some kind of statistics which correlate mass shootings to the amount of guns owned? If so, please share them. It seems to me like these San Bernardino asshats used the first available weapons they could find...it's not as though they waited and stockpiled some kind of arsenal. I don't know why some people like to own multiple guns, nor is it my business. Maybe they like collecting them. Maybe they like taking different kinds to a shooting range for fun. Maybe it makes them feel safer. But when the overwhelming majority of gun owners use them responsibly, I don't why those responsible owners should be restricted in their ownerships because of the actions of people who they don't even know. Otherwise, like I said...should we ban alcohol for everyone because some people might become alcoholics and kill themselves? Same for gambling, same for sugar products, etc?
Btw, if you're going by pure numbers...yes, Americans are much more likely to be killed driving a car than from being shot.
So if I own 100 guns, this is somehow a bigger threat to you than if I own 1-2 or 4-5?
How many guns can one person use at a time? How many guns can one person carry at one time?
Using your retard liberal logic, Jay Leno has a greater risk of having a car accident because, ya know...he has this massive garage full of cars!
Vtard the Big Government pussy doesn't feel 'comfortable'
ointer: 
So if I own 100 guns, this is somehow a bigger threat to you than if I own 1-2?
How many guns can one person use at a time?
Using your retard logic, Jay Leno has a greater risk of having a car accident because....ya know, he has this massive garage full of cars!
Vtard doesn't feel 'comfortable'
Your logic is hysterical. How did that kid get the guns at Sandy Hook? Stole them from gun nut mom.....and used several on that day. Good call Joe. Lmao.
Yeah, that driving thing is a terrible comparison. Accidents and intentional killings are two completely different things.
Same with alcohol....until we have these nuts walking into schools, churches and movie theaters and using alcohol bottles or drunken rants to kill lots of people.....I'm not gonna worry about it.
These latest muslim extremists had thousands of rounds of ammunition legally. Can't believe it wouldn't bother you that these people can get this shit legally. That's not good news.
Unfortunatel now, why people have so many guns had to be our business.....these shootings are now an every week thing.
"several on that day"
So how many guns should one person be allowed to own before vtard the Big Government pussy "feels safe"?
"I don't need to research!"
Fucking hilarious!
Are you retarded? Why would I research something I know the answers to already. You have serious mental problems. And your lying is out of control.
"several on that day"
So how many guns should one person be allowed to own so vtard the Big Government pussy "feels safe"?
It only takes one gun to kill you.
"I don't need to research!"
Fucking hilarious!
If you're gonna troll me all day again.....at least do it right. Your lying and reading comp is embarrassingly bad.
ccording to a 2013 Pew Research study, 37 percent of households had an adult who owned a gun — 24 percent said they owned a gun, and 13 percent said someone else in their household did.
There are about 319 million people in the United States, so that means there are about 118 million gun owners in this nation.
The “Mass Shooting Tracker” counts any incident where four or more people are shot, whether fatally or not, as a mass shooting. For 2015 so far, this tracker counts 294 incidents — of those, there are names for only 45 of the shooters, which leads me to believe the others are gang or crime related. But let’s assume for a moment all 294 shooters were actually law-abiding, legal gun owners.
That means, out of 118 million gun owners, 249 or .00025 percent of the gun-owning population are potential mass shooters.
Of course, now the gun control activists are out in force. Any person who legally owns a gun must be a certified nut bag.
It is a sad truth that there are likely more mentally ill individuals in our nation who will one day get their hands on guns, legally or illegally, and take the lives of some innocent souls.
But some perspective is needed.
According to the Mass Shooting Tracker, 375 individuals have been killed during a mass shooting in 2015.
Now compare that number to 10,076. According to MADD, that’s the number of people killed during drunk driving crashes in 2013 alone. In fact, every day in America, another 28 people die in drunk driving crashes. Every. Single. Day.
Using the liberal logic of banning guns because of tragic (and thankfully, comparatively rare) mass shootings undertaken by crazy white folks (and some not so white), should we not then ban cars?
Cars clearly cause many more fatalities in terms of numbers each day than whack nuts with a gun.
Heck, we should ban bathtubs too. Because 341 people die from drowning and submersion while in or falling into bathtubs. And floors. We need to ban floors too, because 565 people die each year from slipping, tripping or falling.
I don’t mean to be flippant, or to trivialize this terrible tragedy. But as the stories fly around in the next few days regarding this event, you can be darn tootin’ liberals will begin pushing their agendas.
It’s useful to have some facts at your fingertips to provide some perspective – because you’ll never get that from the mainstream media.
Stop lying.
No research necessary if you're a liberal. Just spew enough vapid, demented talking points and hope some of your bullshit sticks in the form of USELESS new laws targeting innocent people.
"I don't need to research!"
"The math didn't work for me!"
"Made up quotes!"
Listen dummy. Try to understand this.....you're the only one that doesn't. I DONT NEED TO RESEARCH QUESTION I KNOW THE ANSWERS TO.
I agree with tends and know what he's referring to. This is one of your dumbest moments yet
