Several Bookmakers Collude Because They Can't Compete With Pinnacle...

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
THE SHRINK said:
but quite another issue when you COLLUDE to get others to do the same thing in an attempt to damage them ...
ahh, this reminds me of the Don Best threads from just a few weeks ago
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15
Tokens
Why bet anywhere else??
No reason too, play at Pinny only
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,932
Tokens
dimeplayersonly said:
but guys...book to book transfers develop out of a courtesy between books and usually from a business relationship........ie. lay-off
I agree, I just cant believe Cris charges $30 for a book to book transfer

outrageous withdrawal fees
20 cent mlb lines

thats why they are losing their customers to Pinnacle, a better book with better customer service.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
One of the supposed parties ads here.
150X18betcris.gif


SHRINK is saying turn away from CRIS??? Hell no! LMAO

He wanted to post on an issue that is very interesting. He did!

Respect the opinion of a man (a poster) who has forgotten more about this industry than we may ever know. He made a solid post. Refute it, but it is a solid observation atleast.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,949
Tokens
CHIPS.............you are absolutely correct......and you also point out a very important hole in what Shrink is saying

SHRINK says pinny is taking business away from Cris and Oly.......

unless you are a current player at pinny looking at their own site.........you arent going to rush and open an account with them because of opinionated lines and reduced vig......


my point is that in order for Pinny to take business away from other books, they would have to market what they offer to the masses......

if the college lines that Pinny doesnt have up on dbs2k are better than other books, i cant tell......(or see them)...

so how are they taking all the business away from Cris and OLY?
 

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Messages
4,663
Tokens
i doubt they are trying to market to get cris and oly customers..

it comes down to this.. OLY and CRIS probably have noticed lopsided amounts going OUT to pinnacle.. so they cut off that avenue in hopes of retaining players funds at their book.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
424
Tokens
DP, Pinny has sf 49ers -1.5 -05 both sides, Cris has -1.5 -110 both sides. Where do you play???


Pinny has Cards cards -157/dodgers +150, Cris has Cards -165/dodgers +145. Where do you play????


See our point on how they are taking biz away???
 

acw

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,313
Tokens
For all those books that do not know it yet, but:



A) Minimise your book-to-book transfers.

B) Stop taking Neteller.

C) Last, but not least avoid RX forum readers.



Main point I am trying to make is that as a book you do not want action from those that are always trying to find the best price! You want guys that will bet into your 1.9 while that same team is available at Even Money everywhere else. I will promise you one thing: You will make more money that way than any smart gambler can make gambling!

God! What am I honest today!
 

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
1,563
Tokens
People make it sound like collusion is something new.


As far as book to book tranfers and what not. Most places pay the fees at a certain amount anyways. Pinnacle just happenns to require quite a bit more than theothers to pay those fees.

Sounds more like a customer service issue than anything else. If Pinnacle were really concerned they would lower thier limits down again to a more reasonable level. They might also start taking Western Union deposits again.

Also, since they stopped taking WU, I am sure this will sting more than normal. But people will always find ways to get money to a place they want to play at.

Not to mention that the gamblers that are taking money from one book and transferring it to Pinnacle aren't your recreational gamblers to begin with. So what is the big deal to these guys (other books) anyways? I would think they would relish all the newbie shitheads flocking to them and not mind seeing a few "smarter" guys move their money.

The books have a strangle hold on theplayers anyways. If they do this, you can damn sure bet that they hedge off between each other on games. Balancing their action amongts themselves to keep from exposing themselves to middles and or scalps.

Some descention in the ranks is a good thing for players, and should not be seen as anything negative. As long as ALL the books don't team up, then I see no problems.
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
dimeplayers,

I don't mind it when you express your opinion, but what I do mind is being misquoted...

Where on this thread have I ever mentioned any other sports book besides Pinnacle????

THE SHRINK
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,949
Tokens
pure speculation on my part.....but the type of player and the number of players Pinny is taking from Cris and Oly is a very small part of the market share........

1. Pinny's type of player...value seekers/semi sharp, sharp.....
which represent a small gambling percent....(increasing yes...but still very small)

2. they prefer online business......not traditional call-in...(again a growing trend...but imo..shaky due to u.s. laws)

CRIS.......gets sharp action.......but not the kind that bets using the internet...
clearing-house for other shops......been that way since the dawn of time..

different books different market..........enough to go around..imo..


btw.....books should concentrate on the asian market if they want to corner the gambling market....



SHRINK..........sorry if i misquoted you....i will read over what i posted.....
 

acw

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,313
Tokens
btw.....books should concentrate on the asian market if they want to corner the gambling market....
You really like to see the books go broke!

Recently I read on SBR:
18/06/2004 11:00:00 BetWWTS (SBR rating A+) Reducing business in Asia to focus on North American and European markets.

Honestly the sharpest gamblers are Asians. Books should stay as far away as possible from them!

Anymore tips that I can give today without getting paid any form of consultancy fee?<!-- / message -->
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,949
Tokens
acw..........several books have done the opposite......quit carrying american sports to focus on the asian market.......

your assumption that asians are sharper gamblers is totally inacurrate....


most asians are notorious for betting the underdogs (american public likes the chalk)........in any sport........having asian customers i know this for a fact...sure there are sharp asians.....but just like americans, the squares far outnumber the sharps...

but that was not the point i was trying to make about the asian market....it was the fact that asians like to gamble.......a numbers perspective.....not type of player......



SHRINK............since you didnt refute what a poster said about Cris and Oly i assumed you meant them.........if its not them then say so.........and i will
apologize...otherwise i am going home....
 

acw

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,313
Tokens
quit carrying american sports to focus on the asian market.......
Which books?

Anyhow here in Asia 90% of all the turnover is on the European football and some books over here have started offering 5-cent lines on those matches. (I just cannot wait to see this new book called Mansion that is trying to get on with the Asian market go under!) Believe me there is absolutely nothing that a Caribbean book will have to offer here without going in the minus!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
4,000
Tokens
What is this nonsense about Asians being sharp? This sounds as generalizing as saying they're all good at math. There are good gamblers and **** gamblers. Gambling knows no nationality.
 

acw

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,313
Tokens
What is this nonsense about Asians being sharp? This sounds as generalizing as saying they're all good at math.
Sorry, I will describe it more appropriate: The asian market is as sharp as sharp can get. At least this is true for both the European football and on Basketball.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,949
Tokens
acw.........last year, maybe the year before.....premium book on dbs2k made the announcement........i may be mistaken about them pursuing only the asian market ...probably european too.....

again i was saying the "numbers" are there.......not the type of bettor...(sharp or square)


asian culture includes gambling......much more so than americans......


a wide open market.....

i was in vietnam several years ago......common practice is for runners (agents) to charge a percent to both winners and losers...on soccer bets....

i can spot a square in any country.........lol....gl



Sorry, I will describe it more appropriate: The asian market is as sharp as sharp can get. At least this is true for both the European football and on Basketball.


acw...........please stop it............that is just not true....

i have booked asians for 10 years and learned from a man that has booked them for over 30.........certain characteristics they do have are

1. prefer underdogs in all sports

2. asian tend to bet as a group.....not individually..(5 americans together 3 like one team 2 like the other)......asians all on the same side..

3. as a whole they are very honorable......very few stiffs..(btw.the ones that are, younger asians...with too much american influence...)

asians as a culture like to gamble that is fact........saying they are sharper makes no sense whatsoever...........
 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Personally I do not think you can stereotype ethnic groups as either sharp square or anything else. Asians as a race like to gambe and many are very good at it but the same can be said of the English for example. I have been invovled in booking some big 100% American/Oriental packages and there were some winners and very sharp bettors but like most packages it included quite a few steady losers. The agents always made a killing if I recall.

I remember booking the staff at a Chinese restaurant in the states (East Coast) one of the cooks would give himself away every time he asked for a line. He would alwys say "what you got Houston? (for example) or what you got over? Doing so he always mentioned the side of the game or total he would bet on. Some bookies might have taken advantage of that in those pre internet days. In the end it didn't matter he lost on his own with the correct numbers.


wil.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
802
Tokens
Shrink-
Of the books colluding, how many are advertising at the top of the forum?

Others-
Books used to like the transfers because they hoped to take customers (and their money) away from Pinny and other popular books. But, of course, this just sped up 'survival of the fittest". Offering exotic gimmicks like props may have brought in some customers, but with high juice, the props offer little alternative to the low-juice offerings at Pinny.

The other practical reason for the book-to-book transfers are simply to save withdrawal/deposit fees. Even if you are getting players, why eat all those deposit fees, if you can just carry a 10-dime figure with a "friendly competitor" book that you trust? With the right books, it could be a worth while symbiotic relationship.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,875
Messages
13,574,501
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com