You are the ONLY one bringing race to the table in here!
By the way, who was in charge of congress for Bush's last two years?
Bush was badhe was not a conservative. He spent $$$ like a drunken Democrat. Just because some of us are scared of the path Obama is taking this country doesn't mean we loved Bush.
DEMS MAY HAVE HAD MORE PEOPLE IN CONGRESS, BUT AS USUAL THEY DEFERRED TO THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT. AND BUSH SPENT MOST OF THAT MONEY ON TWO WARS WITHOUT PAYING FOR THEM AND LEAVING THEM OFF THE BOOKS. ALSO, ON A PRESCRIPTION DRUG BILL THAT HE DID NOT PAY FOR B/C WHEN HE CAME INTO OFFICE HE RESCINDED "PAY AS YOU GO" A CLINTON RULE. OBAMA BROUGHT IT BACK UP FOR CONGRESS TO REINSTATE AND THE REPUBLICANS FILIBUSTERED. SO PLEASE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE YOU GET INTO A DISCUSSION WITH ME B/C YOU WILL LOSE.
I LOVE THE WAY YOU GUYS CLAIM NOW BUSH WAS NOT A CONSERVATIVE. YES HE WAS--AND YOU GUYS LOVED HIM, UNTIL HE WAS WALKING OUT THE DOOR AND THEN SUDDENLY IT WAS NOT A REPUBLICAN ANYMORE. ALSO, EVERY CONSERVATIVE FOR THE LAST HALF CENTURY HAS SPENT MORE THAN THE DEMOCRATS. IT IS A PHONY ASSERTION THAT DEMOCRATS SPEND MORE. AND IF YOU WANT ME TO SEND YOU THE PROOF I WILL BE GLAD TO MY FRIEND. YOU WILL BE WRONG.
ALSO, I DID NOT BRING RACE INTO THE CONVERSATION -- THE OTHER GUY DID WITH HIS "CODE LANGUAGE" I KNOW IT VERY WELL LIVING IN THE SOUTH. SO STICK TO SOMETHING YOU KNOW ABOUT--PLEASE.
ugk