Kevin O’Neill
Texans (+5½) over @Cardinals
This season thus far the Texans are 2-2, the
Cardinals 1-2. Last year during the regular season
the Texans were 8-8, the Cardinals were 9-7. In
2007 both teams were 8-8. In 2006 Houston was 6-
10, Arizona was 5-11. So back to the start of the
2006 season the Texans are 24-28, while the
Cardinals are 23-28, with both teams being within a
game of one another in the standings each and
every year. Importantly, these records were
achieved in divisions of remarkably different
strength. The Cardinals have played in the weakest
division in football over that stretch, benefiting from
two games per year against Rams and 49ers teams that
have largely been awful over that time, while Seattle has
been up and down. The Texans have dealt with a
Jacksonville team that has been up and down and
Indianapolis and Tennessee clubs that are annually near
the top of the powerful AFC.
Both teams have some decent playmakers on defense, but
struggle overall defensively. It seems that both should be
better on D when you look at the rosters. They both have
good passing attacks, and feature some of the best
receivers in football. The Texans have had the better run
offense over the time period we’re looking at, and they
averaged 4.3 yards per rush last year to 3.4 yards per rush
for the Cardinals.
So with all the equality in these two franchises, why is
Arizona such a substantial favorite? Obviously the answer
is last season’s playoff run. The Cardinals had a
magnificent tear through the NFL playoffs, beating a young
Atlanta club in their first playoff game, taking out a
Carolina team that after the way they’ve started this
season is an obvious fraud, and then playing well to beat
Philadelphia. The Cards stepped up after some real regular
season disappointment against top competition to beat
three flawed teams in a weak conference thanks to a 12-3
turnover advantage in those games. They then played
exceptionally well in the Super Bowl but lost.
Now the Cardinals are dealing with the after-effects of that
success. There are egos bruised because they didn’t get
paid, undoubtedly there is jealousy toward those who did
get the money, and they have an aging quarterback who
overcame his recent history of fragility to lead them to the
Super Bowl. There are reasons that Super Bowl teams,
especially the Super Bowl losers, struggle the year after
their successful runs.
This is a need game for the Cards but it’s not like the
Texans want to pass up an opportunity when they’re in the
first of a 4 road games in 5 stretch and they have only one
home game between now and the Sunday before
Thanksgiving. Cardinals have a good home record the past
two years but those were earned against weak divisional
opponents and teams overlooking them. Houston fires
their best shot here, which may be enough to score the
upset. Texans by 1.
@Falcons (+2½) over @49ers
As Erik projected here last week, the 49ers
stampeded the Rams 35-0, showing once again that
it is amazing that Kyle Boller is still in the league.
Two things happened in that game. First of all, the
Niners had to do next to nothing to win the game
against the hapless Rams. Teams that generate 13
first downs and 229 yards on 4 yards per play
ordinarily don’t find themselves scoring 5 TD’s. And
in fact, only two of those TD’s were scored on
offense, with the others being a fumble recovery, a
fumble return, and an interception return. And
both of the offensive scoring drives started in Rams
territory.
Secondly, the Niners have become the toast of the
league. All the post-game shows were talking them
up. Not quite to the Broncos level, but there was a
lot of “wow! 35-0! We need to pay attention to this
team. I mean we need to pay some serious
attention to them!” has been the mantra in the
media since the Rams win.
So the Niners, off an easy, breezy win, will be told
all week how good they are. Meanwhile, the
Falcons played poorly in New England two weeks
ago, and are off their bye week. Obviously the bye
is more meaningful later in the season when it
comes to healing bumps and bruises, but it doesn’t
hurt that the Falcons come off a rare bad game
(haven’t been many in the year+ since Mike Smith
was hired) and have two weeks to stew over it.
Loss of Frank Gore will catch up with the Niners
against a decent run defense like Atlanta. The way
you hurt the Falcons is through the air, and Frisco’s
Shaun Hill has been decent, which is about all you’re
going to get out him. Unquestionably the superior
quarterback here is Matt Ryan.
Interesting subplot to this game was that the
reported runner up for the Falcons job a couple of
years ago was Mike Singletary, Arthur Blank
bypassed him in order to hire Bobby Petrino, of all
people. Not really a factor here, just interesting.
Singletary might use it to try to motivate his players
just a tad. And Singletary is a fine motivator, and a
good coach. But we like the performance pattern
setup in this one, and find Atlanta to be a solid
team. The Falcons won all 5 of their games after
losses last year, going 4-1 against the spread. The
covers were by 17, 8, 21, and 16. The non-cover
was by 2.5 and they had a 3-1 turnover deficit in
that game yet still found a way to win.
These teams are likely pretty similar in ability, but
there’s no Frank Gore and it’s a good setup for a
strong Atlanta performance. Falcons by 4.