For the couple of you posting WWP's Worlds Worst Picker for college hoops, if you are going to do it, you need to be in on all of the plays, he went 3-4 yesterday including his super pick loser, he's now 3-8 on super picks and 89-97 overall in college hoops. Just saying, cuz if you post just 3 or 4 and he's got 7 plays, going 2-2 or 2-3 aint going to make you any money if you are fading WWPs picks, you have to fade all of them consistently and for equal units, otherwise you are just pissing in the wind!
FWIW:
North Coast Game of Year: 4 1/2 stars, Over Dallas/Green Bay, it's been posted, they are 2-0 this year on 4 1/2 star plays.
Mark Lawrence perfect system play was Over in Seattle/Atlanta game yesterday, King Creole's Playoff Total of the Year was Seattle/Atlanta Over.
North Coast 4* newsletter picks for NFL are 5 games under 500 for the year, they have Pittsburgh as a 4* today.
BOL everyone!!
WB , thanks for the info. I believe I know what you are trying to say. However, even at 89-97 a fader would be hitting 52.15% of their plays. In this case, assuming 10% juice a $100 play would win $9700 and lose $9790 (8900 +890 juice).
This is the issue with fading overall, most cappers, as most people will end up within 5% of 50/50, which does not make you money.
Now, in regard to the WWP Super Picks we have something at 3-8. Not only do you limit your plays and thus exposure, but also a killer 8-3 fade record or 72.7%.
Anyway, I would simply forewarn anyone who blindly fades any one capper unless they know they are a longterm 40% capper. Instead, I would use fading certain cappers as a tool and look for many of them on the same side of a game.
WB thanks for the info, this is meant to help only. Good luck with all of your plays.
CPAW, as always, thanks for all your do.