Larry Ness' Club-70 Play-MLB (24-8 or 75% situation since 2008)
My 15* Club-70 Play is on the LA Angels at 3:35 ET. The Angels won a ML-best 100 games last year, while the Mariners fell to 61-101 in 2008, after going 88-74 in 2007. However, while the Angels have struggled in the early going of 2009 at 6-11 (dealing with the tragic death of young pitcher Rick Adenhart, hasn't helped), the Mariners have experienced a re-birth under new manager Don Wakamatsu. After wins in the first two games of this three-game series in Anaheim, Seattle is 12-6, just one-half game behind Toronto for the AL's best record. The Mariners won only 26 games away from home last year but have now won six straight road games, giving them a 7-2 record away from Seattle to open the new season. The starters this afternoon will be the same ones who took the mound back on April 15, when the Mariners beat the Angels 11-3 in Seattle. Jarrod Washburn (former Angel) goes for Seattle and Jered Weaver will pitch for the Angels. Washburn, like his team, is experiencing a renaissance so far in 2009. Entering this year, his 18-6 (3.15) season of 2002 (Angels won World Series that year) had long been forgotten, as these last three years in Seattle have been a 'nightmare.' Washburn was 23-43 (4.55), with the Mariners going 37-52 in his 89 starts from 2006-08. However, he comes into this series finale 3-0 with a 1.71 ERA in three 2009 starts, searching for his first 4-0 start since his rookie season of 1998. Speaking of rookie seasons, Jered Weaver was a sensation in his rookie campaign of 2006, going 11-2 with a 2.56 ERA in 19 starts (team was 14-5). However, he's never quite been the same since. He went 13-7 in 28 starts in 2007 but his ERA climbed to 3.91 that season, while the team finished a more modest 16-12 in his 28 starts. His ERA rose again last year (to 4.33), as Weaver was 11-10 in 30 starts (LA was 15-15). He's 1-1 with a 3.38 ERA to open 2009 but pitched poorly in that April 15 game in Seattle, allowing 10 hits and four ERs in just five innings. However, I'm siding with the Angels in this one for a number of reasons. First of all, while the Mariners are off to an impressive start, they are NOT a better team than the Angels and LA should be able to regroup and avoid the home sweep. Also, let's NOT forget how poorly Washburn's pitched these last three years and let's not be too quick to conclude that he's turned into Sandy Koufax, after just three 2009 starts. I'll close with a focus on some key numbers. The Angels were superb vs left-handed starters in 2008, going 34-16 overall. In home day games against lefties, the Angels were a perfect 6-0 last year, averaging 7.0 RPG (this will be their first such situation this year). As for the Mariners, they were awful vs right-handers last year (40-70), a mark which included a poor 7-18 record in away day games, while scoring just 3.3 RPG. Yes, the Mariners look different early on in 2009 but let me note that they've faced just one right-hander this year in a day game. The Mariners won that game but only 1-0. Going back to the beginning of last year, the Angels are 6-0 vs left-handed starters in home day games, while going against the Mariners vs right-handed starters in road day games leaves one 18-8 (in that same time frame). That's a combined 24-8 situation, or 75.0%. Club-70 Play 15* LA Angels.
Good Luck...Larry
Larry Ness' Div Situational Mismatch of the Month (5-0 TY with Situational Mismatch plays)
My 15* NL West Situational Mismatch of the Month is on the Ari D'backs at 4:10 ET. The Giants and D'backs played last weekend in San Francisco, with the Giants taking two of the three games. All three games ended in 2-0 scores. That shouldn't come as too much of a surprise, as the Giants are batting .242 (ranks 26th) and the D'backs .223 (dead-last at 30th in all of MLB). The Giants were the lowest scoring team in MLB coming into this weekend's three-game set in Chase Field but with 5-1 and 5-3 wins, the Giants have edged past the D'backs in that category, averaging a modest 3.50 RPG to the D'backs' average of 3.41 per. It should also be noted that San Fran entered this series 0-6 on the road in 2009 but this afternoon, are on the verge of a road sweep. What's going on here? Matt Cain (2-0 with a 2.37 ERA in three starts / team is 2-1) looks to improve to 3-0 for the first time in his short career. Most should know Cain's history. He went 13-12 with a 4.15 ERA as a rookie in 2006, as the Giants went 16-15 in his 31 starts. He's a pitcher with good stuff but over the last two seasons, despite ERAs of 3.65 (in 2007) and 3.76 (in 2008), he's gone 7-16 and 8-14. However, that's only PART of the story. His real problem has been the Giants just rarely seem to win when he takes the mound. Cain finished dead-last among all MLB pitchers in 2007 vs the moneyline, as the Giants were an abysmal 9-23 (minus-$1,803) in his starts two seasons ago. The Giants "improved" to 14-20 (minus-$386) in his 2008 starts but that's still a two-year mark of 15-30 and minus-$2,189, which is pretty 'ugly.' Cain has pitched well in the early going of 2009 but I still need to be convinced that the Giants can win on a regular basis with him on the mound. As mentioned earlier, he's looking to start 3-0 for the first time in his career (this is his fourth start of '09) and it should be noted that it took him 14 starts last season to win his third game! Arizona began the season with a strong one-two punch at the top of its rotation with Webb and Haren but Webb quickly went on the DL. The D'backs are hoping that Garland, a free agent, will help solidify and give some depth to a starting rotation that fell apart at the end of last season. Garland was a fairly non-descript starter with the White Sox in his first five seasons but went 18-10 (3.50) when Chicago captured the World Series title in 2006 and followed in 2006 by going 18-7 (4.51). He fell out of favor in Chicago after going 10-13 in 2007 and signed with the Angels last year, going 14-8 with a 4.90 ERA. His high ERA could be a concern but let's note that these last four seasons, Garland's teams are 75-55 in his 130 starts (includes the postseason), after the Angels went 20-12 in his 32 starts last year. All of Garland's starts have come at Chase Field to begin 2009 (this is his fourth) and he's off to a 2-1 start, although his ERA is an unimpressive 5.71. However, Garland pitched well in defeatung the Rockies this past Monday, allowing just two runs (only one was earned) on six hits over 6.2 innings. He walked two and had five strikeouts. Garland is not dominating but as I've already pointed out, unlike with Cain, his teams have a habit of winning when he's on the mound. The 6-11 D'backs don't look in the early going as if they are going to challenge the Dodgers in the NL West but again, it's early. As for the 8-8 Giants, they've lost 90 and 91 games these last two seasons, going a combined 67-95 (.414) on the road. The situation hardly favors them to complete a road sweep of the D'backs, who these last two seasons, have gone 98-64 (.605) in Chase Field. Expect the "hard-luck" Cain to be on the wrong end of the scoreboard" once again. NL West Situational Mismatch of the Month 15* Ari D'backs.
Good Luck...Larry
<!-- / message -->