THE SPORTS ADVISORS
Baltimore (9-5, 10-4 ATS) at Dallas (9-5, 7-7 ATS)
Two teams aiming to stay entrenched in the playoff race square off in a non-conference clash as the Cowboys host the Ravens in what will likely be the last game at Texas Stadium. Dallas rode its defense to a 20-8 victory over the defending Super Bowl champion Giants as a three-point home chalk Sunday night, winning and cashing for the fourth time in five weeks. QB Tony Romo (20 of 30, 244 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs) was sharp, the offense didn’t commit a turnover and the defense sacked New York QB Eli Manning eight times, forcing two turnovers and allowing just 218 total yards. The Cowboys control their own destiny for a wild-card berth and can earn their third straight postseason berth by sweeping their final two games. Baltimore suffered a controversial 13-9 loss to Pittsburgh as a three-point home favorite Sunday, giving up a 92-yard touchdown drive in the final minutes, with the Steelers scoring the game’s only touchdown with 43 seconds left on a play that was reversed by replay. The Ravens had their three-game SU and ATS winning streak halted in the defeat, which gave Pittsburgh the NFC North title and dropped Baltimore into the wild-card race. Ravens rookie QB Joe Flacco (11 of 28, 115 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs) had a dismal day versus Pittsburgh’s top-ranked defense, accounting for both of his team’s turnovers. Baltimore netted just 202 total yards, while allowing 311 – nearly a third of which came on the Steelers’ game-winning TD drive. The SU winner is now on a 23-2 ATS roll in the Ravens’ last 25 games, including 13-1 ATS this season. The winner is also 9-0 ATS in Dallas’ last nine games and 12-2 ATS in its 14 contests this year. These teams have met just twice this decade, with Baltimore going 2-0 SU and ATS, winning by a combined score of 57-10. Most recently, the Ravens rolled 30-10 laying 7½ points at home in 2004.
This contest features two of the NFL’s top stop units. Baltimore is second in the league in total defense (257.5 ypg) and third in scoring defense (15.2 ppg), and Dallas is seventh in total defense (287.0 ypg) and 12th in scoring defense (20.6 ppg). Over their last four games, the Ravens have given up a total of three touchdowns and 33 points, while the Cowboys have surrendered just 37 points and two touchdowns in their last three contests, with one of the TDs the result of an interception returned for a score. Despite Sunday’s victory over the Giants, the Cowboys remain on a 1-7 ATS slide in December, but they are on positive pointspread runs of 4-0 at home and 5-0 as a favorite, and they are 7-0 SU and 5-2 ATS in their last seven games as a non-conference chalk. The Ravens are on ATS skids of 0-4 on Saturdays and 5-12 after a SU loss, but they carry positive pointspread trends of 7-2 overall, 4-1 on the road and 4-1 after an ATS setback. The under for Dallas is on streaks of 4-1 overall, 5-0 in December and 4-1 against winning teams. On the flip side, the over for Baltimore is on stretches of 6-2-1 overall, 4-0-1 on the highway and 8-2-1 as a road underdog.
ATS ADVANTAGE: NONE
COLLEGE FOOTBALL
EAGLEBANK BOWL
Navy (8-4, 6-5 ATS) vs. Wake Forest (7-5, 5-7 ATS) (at Washington, D.C.)
Wake Forest gets a chance to avenge its first loss of the season when it takes on the Midshipmen in the inaugural EagleBank Bowl at RFK Stadium.
These squads met back on Sept. 27 in Winston-Salem, N.C., with Navy pulling off a 24-17 upset win as a 17-point road ‘dog, the Middies first victory over a ranked team in 33 years. Wake Forest had six turnovers in the game, with QB Riley Skinner throwing four interceptions, including a fourth-quarter pick that sealed the Deacons’ fate. Navy outrushed Wake Forest, 292-43. The victory over Wake Forest ignited the Middies, who went on to win five of their final seven (4-3 ATS). That included back-to-back shutouts to close the season – a 16-0 win at Northern Illinois as a three-point underdog and a 34-0 whitewash of archrival Army as a 10½-point chalk. Navy led the nation in rushing at 298.3 yards per contest and Shun White was third in the country averaging 8.7 yards per carry en route to 1,021 rushing yards and eight TDs in 12 games. Bruising FB Eric Kettani ran for 932 yards and four TDs, including a career-high 175 yards against Wake Forest back in September. Beginning with loss to Navy, the Demon Deacons lost five of their last nine games (3-6 ATS) and finished tied for third in the ACC’s Atlantic Division. Wake Forest, which closed the regular season with a 23-10 non-conference win over Vanderbilt as a four-point home favorite on Nov. 29, ranked 103rd in total offense, averaging just 315.8 yards per game, and they have scored just 20 TDs in 41 trips inside the red zone. Meanwhile, after throwing four INTs against Navy, Skinner threw six TDs and just three picks in his final eight games.
This is Navy’s sixth-consecutive bowl appearance, a school record, going 2-3 SU and 4-1 ATS in the last five, including four consecutive spread-covers. The Demon Deacons are in their fourth straight bowl game (2-1 SU and ATS in the previous three). This will be the third meeting between these squads in the last 14 months, including Wake Forest’s 44-24 victory as a three-point road favorite back on Oct. 20, 2007. The Demon Deacons have won four of the last five meetings going back to 1998, going 3-2 ATS. The Middies are on ATS runs of 22-8 away from home, 4-0 in bowl games, 4-0 in December, 4-1 in neutral-site games, 5-2 in non-conference contests and 7-3 against ACC foes. Wake Forest is 17-8 ATS in its last 25 games against winning teams and 4-0 ATS in its last four December contests, but the Deacons are 0-4 ATS in their last four after a spread-cover. Navy has stayed under the total in four of its last five overall, but otherwise it’s all “over” streaks for the Middies, including 8-1-1 against ACC teams, 4-0 in bowl games, 9-4 in neutral-site games and 7-2 when coming off a spread-cover. The Demon Deacons are on a plethora of “under” runs, including 7-2 overall, 17-6-1 in non-conference games, 4-0 in December, 4-0 in bowl games and 4-1 after a spread-cover. Finally, these teams totaled just 41 points in their September meeting, staying well under the posted total.
ATS ADVANTAGE: UNDER
NEW MEXICO BOWL
Fresno State (7-5, 2-10 ATS) vs. Colorado State (6-6, 6-5 ATS) (at Albuquerque, N.M)
Fresno State guns for its fifth bowl victory in the last seven seasons when it battles the Rams at University Stadium in Albuquerque. The Bulldogs qualified for this contest despite losing three of their final five games (1-4 ATS), including getting destroyed 61-10 at Boise State in the season finale Nov. 28, falling way short as a 21½-point road ‘dog as they got outgained by 200 yards. Senior QB Tom Brandstater threw for 2,478 yards and 17 TDs this season, but also tossed 11 INTs. The Bulldogs averaged 176.8 rushing ypg, but RB Anthony Harden had just 11 yards on nine carries in Boise. Also, Fresno’s defense was a weak link all season, giving up 30.3 points and 393.6 total yards per game (197.4 rushing ypg).
First-year Colorado State coach Steve Fairchild guided the Rams to their first bowl berth since 2005. They won their final two games to become bowl eligible, beating New Mexico 20-6 as three-point home favorites on Nov. 15, then going to Wyoming and routing the archrival Cowboys 31-20 as a 1½-point road chalk the following week. Like Fresno, CSU has struggled in a big way on defense, allowing 29.8 points and 410.2 total yards per game (189.4 rushing ypg). These teams squared off in 2006 with Colorado State prevailing 35-23 as a 14-point road-dog in Fresno. They have split four meetings since 2001, but the Rams are 3-1 ATS during this stretch. While Colorado State hasn’t been to a bowl since beating Navy 51-30 in the 2005 Poinsettia Bowl, Fresno State is playing its ninth bowl game in the last 10 years, and the ‘Dogs are 10-7 SU and 6-6 ATS all-time in the postseason, including 4-4 SU and 5-3 ATS under coach Pat Hill. The underdog is a perfect 8-0 ATS in Fresno’s last eight bowl contests, with the Bulldogs being the favorite in three of those contests. Fresno State is 11-25 ATS over the last three full seasons, including 1-9 ATS in the last 10 this year. Additionally, the Bulldogs mired in ATS slumps of 7-19 as a favorite, 4-9 in non-conference games, 1-5 against Mountain West Conference squads and 16-35-1 following a non-cover. The Rams are 0-4 ATS in their last four December contests and 12-18 ATS as an underdog since 2004, including 0-4 SU and ATS as a road pup this season. On the bright side, Colorado State is 9-3 ATS in its last 12 on grass and 5-1 ATS in its last six after a straight-up win. For Fresno, the over is on streaks of 5-2 in bowl games, 6-2 in non-conference contests and 5-2-1 with the Bulldogs as a favorite. The over is 5-1 in Colorado State’s last six overall, but otherwise the Rams are on under runs of 8-3 as an underdog, 11-4 after a straight-up win and 10-4-1 after a spread-cover.
ATS ADVANTAGE: COLORADO STATE
ST. PETERSBURG BOWL
Memphis (6-6, 5-6 ATS) vs. South Florida (7-5, 4-7 ATS) (at St. Petersburg, Fla.)
South Florida makes the short trek from its Tampa Bay campus to Tropicana Field and will have a virtual home game when it battles Memphis in the inaugural St. Petersburg Bowl. South Florida opened the season with five straight wins and climbed to No. 10 in the rankings before losing five of its last seven (3-4 ATS). The Bulls struggled offensively, failing to score more than 20 points in any of their last five, with senior QB Matt Grothe being the biggest culprit as the threw just three TD passes and 11 INTs during this stretch. South Florida averaged 14.8 points in its five losses and 34.9 points in its seven wins. Memphis won three of its last four SU and ATS to get into the postseason, including a 45-6 rout over Tulane as a 14½-point favorite. Junior RB Curtis Steele rushed for 1,175 yards and seven TDs to become the school’s first 1,000-yard rusher in three years. None of the Tigers’ six victories came against an opponent that finished with a winning record, and Memphis averaged 34.2 points in its six wins and just 22.3 points in its six defeats. South Florida is in its fourth straight bowl game, going 1-2 SU and ATS in the previous three, including last season’s embarrassing 56-21 loss to Oregon in the Sun Bowl as a 5½-point favorite. Memphis has won three of its five bowl games all-time, including a 44-27 loss to Florida Atlantic in last year’s New Orleans Bowl as a 3½-point ‘dog. These two were regular competitors earlier this decade, splitting four games both SU and ATS between 2001 and 2004.
Memphis is 10-4 ATS in its last 14 as a double-digit ‘dog, but 1-4 ATS in its last five non-conference games and 8-19-1 ATS in its last 28 after a SU win. South Florida is 3-8 ATS in its last 11 as a favorite and 1-4 ATS in its last five non-conference games, but the Bulls have cashed in four of their last five against Conference USA foes. For Memphis, the over is on streaks 7-3-1 in non-conference games and 5-2 following a straight-up win. Meanwhile, the Bulls have gone over the posted number in six of their last seven non-conference games, but the under is 4-1 in their last five overall and 4-1 in their last five December games.
ATS ADVANTAGE: NONE
LAS VEGAS BOWL
(17) BYU (10-2, 3-8 ATS) vs. Arizona (7-5 SU and ATS) (at Las Vegas)
The Cougars return to the Las Vegas Bowl for the fourth consecutive year, this time facing the Wildcats, who are making their first postseason appearance in a decade. BYU was ranked as high as No. 8 in the country before a 32-17 loss to unranked TCU on Oct. 16, failing as a 1½-point road ‘dog. Despite that setback, the Cougars were still on track to win at least a share of the Mountain West Conference crown, but that goal got squashed in a season-ending 48-24 loss to then-No. 8 Utah on Nov. 22, failing to cash as 6½-point road underdogs to end the season in a 1-7 ATS funk. QB Max Hall threw a career-high five INTs and no TDs in the loss to the rival Utes. Arizona outscored archrival Arizona State 24-0 in the second half on Dec. 6, rolling to a 31-10 victory as an 11-point home favorite to wrap up its first winning season since 1998, which was the last time the Wildcats earned a bowl berth. Arizona outgained the Sun Devils by 227 yards in halting a two-game SU and a three-game ATS slide.
The Cougars have won their last two bowl games inside Sam Boyd Stadium in Las Vegas. In 2006, they clobbered Oregon 38-8 as a three-point favorite, then last year BYU blocked a field goal to secure a 17-16 win over UCLA, falling short as six-point favorites. Meanwhile, Arizona beat Nebraska 23-20 in the 1998 Holiday Bowl in its most recent postseason contest. These squads have met each of the last two regular seasons, with the host winning both and BYU going 2-0 ATS. Last year, the Cougars rolled 20-7 as a 3½-point favorite, with both QBs playing well, as Hall threw for 288 yards and two TDs and Tuitama passed for 216 yards and one score. Both teams feature high-powered offenses. Arizona ranks 16th in the nation in scoring offense (37.1 ppg) and averages 401.3 total ypg, as QB Willie Tuitama finished second in the Pac-10 in passing yards (2,763), TDs (21) and QB rating (143.0). The Cougars put up 35.3 ppg and 446 total ypg, and Hall (69.6 percent completion rate, 3,627 yards, 34 TDs, 13 INTs) led a passing attack that rates seventh in the nation (308.9 ypg). The Cougars have gotten the cash in six of their last eight after a straight-up loss, and they’re 5-1 SU in their last six games against Pac-10 foes (2-0 SU, 1-1 ATS this year). Otherwise, BYU is on negative ATS streaks of 1-7 overall, 1-5 on the road this year, 1-5 in non-conference games, 0-4 in non-conference road games and 1-5 after a non-cover. Arizona has gone 0-4 ATS in its last four against Mountain West squads, 11-29 ATS in its last 40 as a favorite and 1-4 ATS on the highway this season, but the Wildcats are on positive pointspread streaks of 11-5 overall and 6-2 against teams with a winning record. The under is 4-1 in BYU’s last five bowl games and 5-2 in its last seven against Pac-10 squads. The Wildcats are on “under” runs that include 4-0 in December games, 11-5 after a spread-cover and 20-8 on grass. Also, both games between these schools the last two seasons have stayed under the total.
ATS ADVANTAGE: UNDER
COLLEGE BASKETBALL
(6) Duke (9-1, 5-4 ATS) vs. (7) Xavier (9-0, 4-4 ATS) (at East Rutherford, N.J.)
The Izod Center in East Rutherford hosts a clash of Top 10 programs, as Xavier puts its unbeaten season on the line against Duke.
The Musketeers remained perfect with last Saturday’s 76-66 rout of rival Cincinnati, cashing as a 2½-point road favorite. Xavier is 4-0 SU and 3-1 ATS in road/neutral-site games this season, and the Musketeers are allowing opponents to make just 35.7 percent of their shots, which is the 12th best field-goal defense in the nation. Duke bounced back from its first loss – a shocking 81-73 defeat at Michigan as a 10-point road favorite two weeks ago – with Wednesday’s 99-56 rout of North Carolina-Asheville in a non-lined home game. The Blue Devils are 3-1 SU and ATS on the road, and eight of their nine their wins have come by double digits. Coach Mike Krzyzewski’s squad ranks 11th in the nation in scoring at 83.4 points per game. These teams last met in the Elite Eight of the 2004 NCAA Tournament, with Duke eking out a 66-63 victory, but the Musketeers cashed as a 6½-point underdog. The Blue Devils have failed to cash in five straight games on Saturday and nine of their last 13 at neutral venues. Meanwhile, Xavier is on ATS runs of 28-9 at neutral sites and 4-1 against winning teams, but they’ve failed to cover in eight of their last 11 on Saturday. For Duke, the under is on runs of 11-4 overall (all in non-conference play), 8-1 at neutral sites, 4-1 versus Atlantic 10 foes and 6-1 coming off a victory of more than 20 points. Conversely, the Musketeers are on over stretches of 3-0 overall, 12-5 in non-conference action, 4-1 on Saturday and 5-2 after a spread-cover.
ATS ADVANTAGE: XAVIER
(19) Michigan State (7-2, 3-4 ATS) vs. (5) Texas (9-1, 4-3 ATS) (at Houston)
Texas takes its six-game winning streak east to Houston for a non-conference clash with Michigan State at the Toyota Center.
Since knocking off then-No. 15 Villanova 67-58 as a two-point favorite at Madison Square Garden in New York, the Longhorns have slept-walked to victories over Division II foes Southwest Texas State (81-73) and Texas Southern (88-72) in non-lined home games. Texas has scored at least 67 points in all 10 of its games and is outscoring visitors by an average of 17 points per game (76-59). Michigan State has ripped off three consecutive blowout home victories since an embarrassing loss to top-ranked North Carolina, crushing Bradley 75-59 as a 15-point home favorite, Alcorn State 118-60 in a non-lined game and The Citadel 79-65 as a 28-point home chalk, the latter contest played on Wednesday. The Spartans are 3-1 away from home, but 1-2 ATS. These teams met each of the last two years, with Michigan State going 2-0 SU and ATS, winning 78-72 as a 4½-point road underdog in 2006 and 78-72 as a four-point home chalk in 2007. The SU winner is 4-0 ATS in the last four head-to-head battles going back to 1999. The Spartans are on ATS upticks of 4-0 versus the Big 12 and 4-1 after a non-cover, but they’re 0-5 ATS in their last five after a SU victory and 2-7 ATS in their last nine games on Saturday. Meanwhile, Texas is 6-1 ATS in its last seven on Saturday, but 1-4 ATS in its last five against the Big Ten. The over is 7-1 in Michigan’ State’s last eight games against Big 12 foes and 7-3 in Texas’ last 10 after a SU win.
ATS ADVANTAGE: NONE
(9) Louisville (6-1, 4-2 ATS) vs. Minnesota (9-0, 4-2 ATS) (at Glendale, Ariz.)
Minnesota puts its unbeaten record on the line at University of Phoenix Stadium when it faces its first Top 25 opponent this year in ninth-ranked Louisville. The Golden Gophers have rolled to five straight double-digit wins, going 3-0 ATS in lined contests during this stretch. They’ve been idle since Dec. 10, when they pounded South Dakota State 74-60 in a non-lined home game. Tubby Smith’s squad has played just once away from Minneapolis this year, and they eked out a 72-71 victory at Colorado State, pushing as a one-point road favorite. The Cardinals faced Ole Miss in a neutral-site game in Cincinnati on Thursday, struggling to a 77-68 win but coming up short as a 16-point favorite. Since suffering a stunning 14-point loss to Western Kentucky on Nov. 13, Rick Pitino’s troops have won five in a row (2-1 ATS) by an average margin of 25 ppg. Louisville’s defense has been tremendous to this point, ranking 22nd in the nation in points allowed (57.6 ppg), 11th in field-goal defense (35.8 percent) and second in three-point defense (24.5 percent). Meanwhile, Minnesota is giving up 62.1 ppg on 39.2 percent shooting (32.7 percent from three-point range). However, the Gophers make 49 percent of their shots (73.6 ppg), while Louisville connects at a 44.5 percent rate (79.6 ppg)
The Golden Gophers are 1-7 ATS in their last eight neutral-site games, while Louisville is 0-4 ATS in its last four against the Big Ten, but 21-9-1 ATS in its last 31 overall and 6-2 ATS in its last eight on Saturday.
For Minnesota, the under is on streaks of 16-5 overall in lined games, 37-14 on Saturdays, 5-2 in non-conference play, 4-0 at neutral sites and 8-2 after a SU win. Also, Louisville is on under stretches of 6-1 overall, 4-1-1 at neutral venues, 35-17-1 in non-conference games and 5-0 after a non-cover.
ATS ADVANTAGE: LOUISVILLE and UNDER
(22) Davidson (8-1, 4-3 ATS) vs. (13) Purdue (8-2, 4-4 ATS) (at Indianapolis)
Player-of-the-Year candidate Stephen Curry takes his sharp-shooting act to Conseco Fieldhouse as he leads Davidson in a Top 25 non-conference clash against Purdue. Davidson has been involved in three consecutive nail-biters, but won them all, including last Saturday’s 100-95 victory over Chattanooga, falling way short as a 23-point home favorite. Curry went 11-for-22 from the field (5-for-11 from 3-point range) and finished with 41 points, the third time this season he’s netted more than 40. Curry leads the nation in scoring at 32 points per game, despite the fact he was held scoreless once this season. Purdue also has been off since last Saturday, when it pounded Indiana State 76-62, coming up short as a 25-point home favorite. Since consecutive losses to ranked foes Oklahoma (87-82 in overtime in New York) and Duke (76-60 at home), the Boilermakers have won three in a row by margins of 48, 29 and 24 points, going 1-1 ATS in lined games. Purdue has followed up an 18-4-1 ATS run by going 1-4 ATS in its last five lined outings. With Curry leading the way, Davidson ranks seventh in the nation in scoring at 86.1 ppg, while making 44.8 percent of its shots. However, the Boilermakers are allowing just 57 ppg on 34.7 percent shooting, figures that rank 17th and fifth in the nation, respectively. Davidson, which has alternated spread-covers in its last six games, is on a bunch of positive ATS runs, including: 48-22-1 overall, 44-18 away from home, 11-2 in non-conference play, 4-0 against the Big Ten, 46-19-1 after a SU win and 40-19-2 on Saturdays. On the flip side, in addition to its 1-4 ATS rut overall, Purdue is in pointspread funks of 0-4 at home and 1-4 against winning teams, but the Boilers have cashed in seven of their last nine on Saturdays. The over is 5-1 in Davidson’s last six road games, but the under is 4-1 in its last five oveall and 7-2 in its last nine on Saturdays.
ATS ADVANTAGE: DAVIDSON
(2) Connecticut (9-0, 3-2 ATS) vs. (8) Gonzaga (7-1, 5-2 ATS) (at Seattle)
Less than a week after its perfect season came to an end, Gonzaga will attempt to hand second-ranked UConn its first setback as the Bulldogs make the short trip from Spokane to Seattle for what is technically a neutral-site contest at Key Arena. Gonzaga, playing its sixth straight game on a road or neutral court, went to Arizona as a six-point road chalk Sunday but fell 69-64. It marked the first time all year that the Bulldogs failed to score at least 70 points, and was just the third time they had given up more than 59. However, Mark Few’s team bounced back from the Arizona loss with Thursday’s 84-42 home rout of Texas Southern in a non-lined contest. As usual, UConn has fattened up on cupcakes early in the season, including four straight wins over the likes of Bryant (88-58), Delaware State (79-49), Buffalo (68-64) and Stony Brook (91-57). Only the Buffalo victory was on the betting board, and the Huskies failed to cash as a 15-point road favorite in that one. Gonzaga played UConn on a neutral court in Boston last December and came away with an 85-82 victory, covering as a 5½-point underdog. The Bulldogs are 3-0 ATS in three meetings against the Huskies since 1999, all as an underdog.
For the season, Gonzaga is averaging 78 points per game on 48.1 percent shooting and allowing 57.7 ppg on 35.2 percent shooting, the latter number good for ninth-best in the country. Meanwhile, UConn is 15th in the nation in scoring (83 ppg) and seventh in field-goal percentage (51.1), and Jim Calhoun’s troops give up just 60 ppg on 37.1 percent shooting.
UConn is 9-3-1 ATS in its last 13 games against winning teams and 5-2 ATS in its last seven on Saturday, but otherwise the Huskies are in pointspread dips of 5-13 in lined non-conference games, 4-17 at neutral sites, 1-4 against the West Coast Conference and 0-6 when coming off a victory of more than 20 points. Gonzaga is on ATS tears of 5-2 overall (all in non-conference), 21-7 on Saturdays, 4-0 against the Big East and 6-2 after a win of more than 20 points. The Huskies are on “over” stretches of 8-2 overall in lined contests, 13-3 at neutral sites and 5-1 after a SU win. The over is also 20-6 in Gonzaga’s last 26 games on Saturday, but otherwise the Zags are on “under” spurts of 6-1 overall and 4-0 at neutral venues.
ATS ADVANTAGE: GONZAGA and OVER
(11) Syracuse (10-1, 3-5 ATS) at (23) Memphis (6-2, 4-4 ATS)
Syracuse looks for its third victory of the season against a ranked opponent when it heads to the FedEx Forum in Memphis for a battle with the Tigers. The Orange opened the season with nine straight wins, including back-to-back victories over 18th-ranked Florida (89-83) and 22nd-ranked Kansas (89-81). However, their unbeaten season ended in brutal buzzer-beating fashion Monday, as Cleveland State hit a 60-foot shot as time expired to steal a 72-69 win at the Carrier Dome as a 10½-point road underdog. Jim Boeheim’s squad rebounded from that setback with Wednesday’s 82-60 rout of Canisius, but failed to cover as a 23-point home favorite, dropping to 1-4 ATS in its last five lined games.
Memphis also bounced back from a tough loss on Wednesday, downing Arkansas-Little Rock 59-51 at home but coming nowhere close to covering the 22-point spread. Last Saturday, the Tigers went to Georgetown and took the 19th-ranked Hoyas to overtime before falling 79-70 as a six-point road underdog. These teams last met at Madison Square Garden in November 2004, with the Orange rolling to a 77-62 victory as a 2½-point favorite. Two years earlier, Memphis beat Syracuse 70-63 as a 4½-point home ‘dog. Syracuse has scored at least 69 points in every game this year, producing 79 or more eight times, and the Orange rank 20th in scoring offense (82 ppg) and 17th in field-goal offense (49.7 ppg). Meanwhile, the Tigers have scored 80 points or more five times, but have also been held to 58 and 59 points in two of their contests. John Calipari’s squad is netting 78 ppg on just 42.1 percent shooting, including a woeful 27.3 percent from 3-point land. Syracuse is 4-1 ATS in its last five on Saturday, but 0-8 ATS in its last eight following a victory of more than 20 points. Meanwhile, Memphis 4-1 ATS in its last five on Saturday, but 1-4 ATS in its last five against teams with a winning record.
The over is on streaks of 4-1 for Syracuse on Saturday, 5-2 for Syracuse following a victory, 5-1 for Memphis on Saturday and 8-0 for Memphis when facing Big East opponents.
ATS ADVANTAGE: OVER