Service Plays Monday 2/15/10

Search

Underdog
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
4,375
Tokens
Maryland would be the play

On Maryland:
ATSKINGS
Linechangers
Kyle Bales
Luke Anthony
Redzone Sports
KB Hoops

On Virginia:
Trent "Absolut" Citron
Killer Sports Live
 

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
123
Tokens
That is the public. The quote earlier was "the whole world is on A&M. He was talking about all the touts and cappers and he was right. They are all on A&M.

the most money wagered today has been on villnova and kansas
according to sportsbook.com
 

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
123
Tokens
All you have to do is go to vegasinsider.com. Click on NCAA Basketball Matchups and you can see where the public money is. Every game will have about 70% on the favorite and 70% on the over.

Where did u go to see that?
 

Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
2,312
Tokens
I know it list as "TBD" on RAS website, but does anyone think they are going to have a play tonight. Any input would be appreciated...
 

ugk

Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
4,161
Tokens
I know it list as "TBD" on RAS website, but does anyone think they are going to have a play tonight. Any input would be appreciated...

RIGHT ANGLE SPORTS (RAS)
No Total Play for Monday. Good Luck.
*No play for 02/15/10.
 

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
1,111
Tokens
4* #726 MARYLAND/VIRGINIA UNDER

Under Looking for tempo and offensive efficiency? Not here. This makeup affair brings in a pair of teams with sluggish legs off of tough Saturday A.C.C. road games, and little time to prepare for defenses that create all sorts of tactical matchup problems. But while we can see clear signs that the Tony Bennett era is clearly underway at Virginia, the markets leave excellent value on the table.Bennett basketball means some of the best fundamental man-to-man defense that we are going to see anywhere, with the lane almost impenetrable by opposing dribbles through those “wall” concepts. Meanwhile the offense focuses on being methodical and taking care of the ball, trying to eliminate the turnovers that can lead to quick runouts, and which prevent their own defense from setting up. The more the players learn the system the slower the pace gets on each end of the court, and only a desperation 25-foot triple at the buzzer by Sammy Zieglinski vs. Virginia Tech back on January 28th has kept it from being a perfect 6-0 current run to the Under. Those last six games finished 85.5 points below the projections in regulation, showing just how far the oddsmakers are from reading the right level.That defense continues here against a Maryland team getting the first look at the Bennett defenses, and without much prep time, but the Terrapins are playing fierce defense of their own – they are allowing just 39.0 percent from the field in A.C.C. play. Their problem is that much like Virginia, their own half-court offense can bog down. They need to get out into the open court to be successful, and with the Cavalier style based so much on preventing that from happening (96 TO’s in nine A.C.C. games) it is not going to be much part of these proceedings, including a pair that went to O.T.).Each of these teams has played nine conference games, with Maryland allowing 99 assists while forcing 130 turnovers, and Virginia 93 while forcing 117. It shows just how difficult it is to break these defenses down, and the lack of time to put a game plan together exacerbates those issues tonight


Sorry should have remembered to mention... ALWAYS fade malinsky totals.

though he hit 2 on saturday he is 48% in totals in all sports over the past 5 years.


Sorry i got tied up with Mike Vianni speellling for leter wurds..

:ohno:
 

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
837
Tokens
Typical Idiot

my parlay tied up with Tenn state winning, rats this stinks

Tennesse State is covering the game with over eight minutes to go.

What's your problem? Does your parlay pay on the FINAL score or do you expect to lead every game throughout? Idiot.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Messages
211
Tokens
NBA AT THE BREAK

Some say the NBA is simply an acronym for Nothing But Aggravation. Others contend it's merely a Nice Bankroll Additive. Whatever your take, there is no better time than the present - with Pro Basketball taking a time out for the All-Star break - to examine the condition of each team in the league at this stage of the season. From the surprise teams to the disappointments, the run to the playoffs is about to take off.

What we've seen thus far is some teams have excelled against foes that do not own a winning record, such as the Hawks (18-8 ATS) and the Kings (17-9-1 ATS), while others have struggled in games against lousy competition, such as the Mavericks (9-17 ATS), the Nets (8-16-1 ATS) and the Hornets (8-18 ATS).

On the flip, a handful of teams have risen to the occasion when squaring off against quality, winning opposition - teams like the Cavaliers (21-4 SU and 16-7-2 ATS), the Hornets 18-9 ATS) and the Thunder (19-9 ATS). The Wizards are biggest money burner in games against winning teams (7-14 ATS), season to date.

Here's a quick look at some of the GOOD, BAD, and UGLY team trends on every team and how they have fared SU (Straight Up) and ATS (Against The Spread) this season in games played through the All-Star break. In addition, I also break down performance records for each team in games versus .500 or less and greater than .500 opponents this campaign. Do your homework now, and enjoy the rest of the season…

ATLANTA

Good: 12-2 ATS vs. opp of .375 or less
Bad: 1-4 ATS as dog less than five points
Ugly: 0-3 ATS with no rest vs. division
Vs. .500 or less: 19-7 SU, 18-8 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 15-10 SU, 14-11 ATS

BOSTON

Good: 6-1-1 ATS pick or favorite of 4 or less points
Bad: 1-7 ATS favorites of 12 or more points
Ugly: 1-11 ATS home off loss
Vs. .500 or less: 23-6 SU, 10-19 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 9-12 SU, 9-11-1 ATS

CHICAGO

Good: 5-0-1 ATS vs. division opp off loss
Bad: 3-9 ATS away off SU and ATS loss
Ugly: 1-5 ATS off SU favorite loss
Vs. .500 or less: 13-12 SU, 10-13-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 12-14 SU, 14-12 ATS

CLEVELAND

Good: 8-0 SU and ATS vs. opp of .750 or greater
Bad: 1-4 ATS home with no rest
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS vs. opp with 3+ days rest
Vs. .500 or less: 20-6 SU, 10-16 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 21-4 SU, 16-7-2 ATS

DALLAS

Good: 7-1 ATS away off loss
Bad: 3-16 ATS home vs. non-division opp
Ugly: 0-4 ATS off BB SU and ATS losses
Vs. .500 or less: 18-8 SU, 9-17 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-12 SU, 12-14 ATS

DENVER

Good: 7-0-1 ATS home vs. opp off double-digit win
Bad: 1-6 ATS off SU dog win
Ugly: 0-4 ATS away vs. opp off SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-16-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-16 SU, 10-11-1 ATS

DETROIT

Good: 4-1-1 ATS vs. .250 or less opp
Bad: 4-14-2 ATS off ATS loss of 4 or more points
Ugly: 0-5-1 ATS fav off SU and ATS loss
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-16-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-16 SU, 10-11-1 ATS

GOLDEN STATE

Good: 7-1 ATS dog vs. unrested opp
Bad: 2-6 SU and ATS fav of less than 6 points
Ugly: 1-5 ATS off loss vs. opp of SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 10-15, 12-12-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 4-22 SU, 16-10 ATS

HOUSTON

Good: 3-0 ATS vs. opp with 3 more days rest
Bad: 2-9 ATS fav with revenge
Ugly: 0-5 ATS vs. non div opp off SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 18-8, 13-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 9-16 SU, 11-14 ATS

INDIANA

Good: 5-0 ATS double-digit dog
Bad: 1-5 ATS off loss vs. div opp
Ugly: 1-7 ATS dog of 3 or less points
Vs. .500 or less: 14-16 SU, 13-17 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 4-18 SU, 9-13 ATS

LA CLIPPERS

Good: 5-1-1 ATS fav vs. Eastern Conference
Bad: 1-6 ATS dog vs. opp off double-digit win
Ugly: 0-7 ATS with rest vs. conf opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Vs. .500 or less: 14-15 SU, 13-15-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 7-16 SU, 11-12 ATS

LA LAKERS

Good: 6-1 ATS away vs. opp off double-digit loss
Bad: 2-7-1 ATS fav of 5 or less points
Ugly: 1-6 ATS vs. opp off BB SU and ATS wins
Vs. .500 or less: 23-3 SU, 14-12 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 18-10 SU, 11-15-2 ATS

MEMPHIS

Good: 12-1 ATS off win vs. opp of loss
Bad: 3-8 ATS away off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS off loss vs opp off SU and ATS win
Vs. .500 or less: 12-7 SU, 11-7-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-18 SU, 16-16 ATS

MIAMI

Good: 10-2 ATS vs. less .400 opp
Bad: 1-5 ATS vs. opp off SU dog win
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS off 3 wins
Vs. .500 or less: 16-10 SU, 14-12 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 10-17 SU, 12-14-1 ATS

MILWAUKEE

Good: 7-1 ATS no rest vs. unrested opp
Bad: 1-5 ATS off SU dog win vs. opp off win
Ugly: 0-3 ATS off 3-0 SU and ATS
Vs. .500 or less: 19-11 SU, 19-11 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-16 SU, 12-9 ATS

MINNESOTA

Good: 9-0 ATS dog of less 4 points
Bad: 4-11 ATS off BB losses vs opp off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS vs. unrested con opp
Vs. .500 or less: 8-20 SU, 15-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-20 SU, 13-12 ATS

NEW JERSEY

Good: 4-0 ATS double-digit div dog
Bad: 12-27-2 ATS vs. non div opp
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS fav
Vs. .500 or less: 4-21 SU, 8-16-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 0-27 SU, 11-15-1 ATS

NEW ORLEANS

Good: 10-2 ATS dog of more 7 points
Bad: 2-10 ATS fav off win
Ugly: 0-9 ATS vs. less .300 opp
Vs. .500 or less: 15-11 SU, 8-18 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 13-14 SU, 18-9 ATS

NEW YORK

Good: 8-1 ATS off loss of 14 more points
Bad: 1-5 ATS off double-digit win
Ugly: 1-6 ATS away with no rest
Vs. .500 or less: 14-18 SU, 14-17-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-14 SU, 9-10 ATS

OKLAHOMA CITY

Good: 14-1 ATS off SU and ATS loss
Bad: 2-6 ATS vs. unrested opp
Ugly: 1-6 ATS off double-digit ATS win vs. opp off BB wins
Vs. .500 or less: 16-7 SU, 13-10 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-14 SU, 19-9 ATS

ORLANDO

Good: 8-0 ATS vs. unrested opp off win
Bad: 1-5 ATS vs opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Ugly: 1-7 ATS home off SU and ATS win
Vs. .500 or less: 22-7 SU, 15-12-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-11 SU, 9-13-3 ATS

PHILADELPHIA

Good: 5-0 ATS dog of more 10 points
Bad: 7-18 ATS home
Ugly: 1-8 ATS home dog
Vs. .500 or less: 13-17 SU, 12-18 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 7-15 SU, 11-11 ATS

PHOENIX

Good: 4-0 ATS away vs. opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Bad: 2-7 ATS off win of 18 or more points
Ugly: 0-5-1 ATS with revenge vs. unrested opp
Vs. .500 or less: 17-9 SU, 13-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-13 SU, 14-12-1 ATS

PORTLAND

Good: 5-0 ATS no rest vs. opp of loss
Bad: 2-6-1 ATS off SU and ATS loss vs. opp off SU and ATS win
Ugly: 0-4 ATS off win vs. unrested opp
Vs. .500 or less: 18-9 SU, 14-12-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 13-15 SU, 15-12-1 ATS

SACRAMENTO

Good: 8-1 as double-digit dog
Bad: 3-9 ATS vs. Eastern Conference opp off win
Ugly: 0-5 ATS away vs. opp off SU favorite loss
Vs. .500 or less: 15-12 SU, 17-9-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 3-22 SU, 10-14-1 ATS

SAN ANTONIO

Good: 5-1 ATS off double-digit win vs. opp off BB wins
Bad: 2-5 ATS as dog of 2 more points
Ugly: 1-8 ATS off division
Vs. .500 or less: 20-8 SU, 15-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 10-13 SU, 10-13 ATS

TORONTO

Good: 8-2 ATS vs. unrested opp
Bad: 3-9 ATS with no rest
Ugly: 1-7 ATS away off loss vs. non div opp
Vs. .500 or less: 21-10 SU, 17-14 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 8-13 SU, 10-11 ATS

UTAH

Good: 9-0 SU and ATS home vs unrested opp
Bad: 2-5 ATS vs. div opp off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS fav of more than 7 points vs. div opp off loss
Vs. .500 or less: 17-7 SU, 14-10 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 15-12 SU, 17-8-2 ATS

WASHINGTON

Good: 4-1 ATS off win of less than 4 points
Bad: 1-6 ATS vs. opp of .750 greater
Ugly: 1-10 ATS fav more than 2 points
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-15-3 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-15 SU, 7-14 ATS

Thanks for this UGK. It helped today with Milwaukee
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,444
Messages
13,581,894
Members
100,983
Latest member
nammoidenroiiiii
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com