TampaLuke--
A lot of this bet hinged on Schexenayder playing... Schexenayder, Wagner, and Roe is just as good as any WR trio in the league... but without Schex it's gonna be rough... That being said, you're right that LA's losses are factored into this and San Jose gets a ton of respect for being San Jose. In actuality, San Jose's might be 0-2 on the road, but that's at Tampa (3-1) and at New Orleans (3-1). New Orleans has lost a total of once at home in a season and change and Tampa is always a tough place to play. These are also cross-country trips.
I don't know... I understand why the value isn't there at 8.5 or whatever it's at right now, but I think San Jose is just due to put up a San Jose game. You might say that there's no such thing as "due" and there's an equal shot (in theory) that a team covers any given game, but the fact of the matter says that no one is going to go worse than 6-10 ATS. SJ is 1-2. LA is 2-1. Yes, it's early in the season, but San Jose against the one team they really should've crushed, they did... Vegas... and it was Vegas' only loss.
So all that being said, San Jose is still the superior team, and on a neutral field, they probably would have been 10-12 point favorites, and at home, probably 13.5 or so... you're going to see AFL lines tighten up very soon, as the teams that will typically destroy people at home... Tampa, San Jose, a healthy Arizona, Chicago, etc. will start destroying these lesser teams and not cover. Expect lines in the 20s by week 7 or so. And when these two teams hook up later in the season in San Jose, the Saberkitties will likely be one of the double digit home favorites again... and they'll probably not only win, but also cover the figure. I just don't think this LA team is any good. We'll see in a couple hours. If they beat San Jose, they've got a huge lead in the division over the "real" teams. But again, the way this season has gone, who knows...
--AFLGuru:toast: