SB Prof

[wdhart3]

I'm fading all of this dude's NCAA plays from now on....

 

[dlunc3]

add another nba and ncaa game to the tally... man do I regret following this moron at all

 

[rock40237]

NBA (A) Washington LOST (B) Mavericks LOST (C) Tomorrow
NCAAB (A) North Texas LOST (B) Uconn LOST (C) Tomorrow
NFL (A) Chargers -6.5

Record starting 1/14/10

NBA system 0-0, overall 0-2 Last win: None -3.5 units
NCAAB system 0-1, overall 0-5 Last win: None -11.8 units
NFL system 1-0, overall 1-0 Last win: Saints +1 unit

All -14.3 units

 

[dlunc3]

i would be loaded if I had been fading this clown since last week

 

[rock40237]

yea, im going to continue to keep an eye on him, because ive heard he has an amazing track record. but i'll be watching from the sidelines til he gets his head outta his ass... i mean hes lost 7 straight basketball games and 9 outta his last 10.

 

[My3Sons]

I've been following since 12/9 and all is good. His NFL is undefeated in a 3 game chase and his NBA hasn't lost a series since I have been following.

NCAAB is new and I have followed 1 or 2 times, so I am 1-1 with it.

Not a bad record for me personally. Give it some time and be careful with the new NCAAB system. Too many games fall in the pointspread ranges he needs. It then becomes game selection management, which is human driven and not system driven. For example if the system has 6 plays each day and it goes 4-2, then all is good until.... you pick the 2 losers to play the system with.

 

[rock40237]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTpbM3-vsI4

 

[rock40237]

time to start fading...this is horrendous

 

[shermanator]

I agree I think we should start fading his NCAA BB plays.

 

[rock40237]

NBA (A) Washington LOST (B) Mavericks LOST (C) Tomorrow
NCAAB (A) North Texas LOST (B) Uconn LOST (C) Tomorrow
NFL (A) Chargers LOST (B)

Record starting 1/14/10

NBA system 0-0, overall 0-2 Last win: None -3.5 units
NCAAB system 0-1, overall 0-5 Last win: None -11.8 units
NFL system 1-0, overall 1-1 Last win: Saints -.1 units

All -15.4 units

 

[wdhart3]

SBP and JM are on horrible streaks!

 

[takster]

Yea hopefully we turn it around... I had the worst 2 weeks from fading lang and these 2 systems....

 

[wdhart3]

Let's get the pics on here early...early games today.

 

[takster]

no early games for nba

 

[doodoobrown]

so what happen this shit is looking like major c bet city

 

[wdhart3]

I'm thinking about fading all A bets and then playing B and C straight up....

 

[shermanator]

I'm thinking about fading all A bets and then playing B and C straight up....

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Anyone know what percentage does SBP hit the [A]. I'm guessing its under 50%.

 

[hoiduitu]

I have just read through this whole thread to catch up, and it seems to me there is absolutly no logic to this chase system. I'm trying to get my head round it because most chase systems are based around a teams motivation... take JM for instance. All his systems are based around motivation...

- In MLB for example if you get swept by a team you will be more motivated to come back and perform against them in the next series you play them

These systems are all based around 1 team, which makes sense because 1 team over a space of 3 games is more likely to respond to a loss or a battering! Having three random teams / plays surely is a massive risk as there is no structure

I'm trying to figure out the logic in this, but it seems completely random to me. I'm not critisizing it or the people who play it because I don't know the records for this year, and I haven't played it myself, but can someone enlighten me??

To me it just seems like you could pick 3 teams that you think will cover, and there is another system

 

[Stilwell]

hoiduitu
taken from SB Professor system explanation

The basic premise behind the system is
simple: There are certain point spreads where
the favorite covers at a higher rate than
usual. Conversely, there are point spreads
where it’s better to bet on the underdog
because favorites cover at such a low
percentage.
During the course of our research on
NBA basketball, we found out a couple of
interesting principles.
1.The same point spread that Favorites
cover at home, they are likely to cover on
the road
2.Large Underdogs do well at home and on
the road, but slightly better on the road.
To do the research for NBA Basketball, I used
the same point spreads as in NFL and NCAA
football, between 1 pt. and 13 pt. favorites.
If you do not understand what a point
spread is let me explain. If the Golden State
Warriors are playing the Denver Nuggets
and the point spread is listed as Golden St
-2.5, we read that as ‘Golden St. minus 2.5,’
and this means the Warriors are a 2.5 point
favorite. In this example the Warriors must
win by 3 points or more for a bet on Golden
St. to be a winner.

 

[doodoobrown]

I have just read through this whole thread to catch up, and it seems to me there is absolutly no logic to this chase system. I'm trying to get my head round it because most chase systems are based around a teams motivation... take JM for instance. All his systems are based around motivation...

- In MLB for example if you get swept by a team you will be more motivated to come back and perform against them in the next series you play them

These systems are all based around 1 team, which makes sense because 1 team over a space of 3 games is more likely to respond to a loss or a battering! Having three random teams / plays surely is a massive risk as there is no structure

I'm trying to figure out the logic in this, but it seems completely random to me. I'm not critisizing it or the people who play it because I don't know the records for this year, and I haven't played it myself, but can someone enlighten me??

To me it just seems like you could pick 3 teams that you think will cover, and there is another system

i was wondering the same shit

he said if u lose a b bet but miss the c bet bc it was a late game or whatever reason then play tomorrows game as ur c bet although it might be some peoples A bet..........wtf wtf makes no sense at all