Saturday Service Play Thread 3/12/2022

[savage1]

Totally agree with your Jack Winningham comment.
he’s clearly not your usual tout. I.e. class act!

Once I read what he had said(and then quoted) about Jack Winningham, I corroborated what I thought about his overall credibility.

I would love him to come back and explain why he said what about Jack Winning with some proof or documentation!!

I have a very skeptical attitude about sports services in general but am not Captain Queeg!!

Hopefully you understand the comparison/analogy.

 

[savage1]

I am posting this here only to expose Rockland even more by insinuating that Jack is either a front for someone else or a scamdicapper.

I mean how can anyone expect anything better from a guy who charges nothing for his picks, offers the best gambling advic

out here for those who ae new to gambling, who wins as much as just about anyone out there and who is extremely disciplined

on how many picks he gives out.

Perhaps Rockland can comment on what he doesn't like about Jack.

 

[savage1]

Come on, Big Boy Rockland, comment on what I just posted if you have the balls that is!!!

 

[savage1]

Come on, Big Boy Rockland, comment on what I just posted if you have the balls that is!!!

I am going to lunch, which means that you have added time to see if you can figure out a way to respond to what I posted earlier.

If you can't do it on your own, perhaps one of your buddies(if you have any) can help you out!!

 

[savage1]

Let's just say that I am very comfortable with what I said today in my three posts and now four.

I don't expect Rockland to respond to these, but if he wishes to do so in a civil manner, I would be more than glad to

engage him in a discussion about Jack Winningham as well as his statements that he "never heard of Jack Winninham"

when I proved that the statement is simply not true!!

 

[skippy79]

Let's just say that I am very comfortable with what I said today in my three posts and now four.

I don't expect Rockland to respond to these, but if he wishes to do so in a civil manner, I would be more than glad to

engage him in a discussion about Jack Winningham as well as his statements that he "never heard of Jack Winninham"

when I proved that the statement is simply not true!!

Don't you see? He is just trying to get you riled up. Just don't listen to him, we have known you've been on here for years, always contributing. Just don't even waste your time man.

 

[savage1]

Don't you see? He is just trying to get you riled up. Just don't listen to him, we have known you've been on here for years, always contributing. Just don't even waste your time man.

Well, he will have to come over and engage me from now on if he keeps his promise and doesn't say anything else in the service thread.

In any case, you are right in what you say, meaning that he is an internet troll.

Thanks for posting your thoughts!!