look back 4+ years now, you could make a legit argument that she couldn't have done any worse. Hindsight is 20/20 after all.
QFT, another spot on OP by Willie99 when it was posted, the mayor of libtardville is really devoid of substance (nothing new there). He scratches the surface, which is the plague of libtardism
McCain was suffering from a lack of enthusiasm and a lack of money, in no particular order, and he was in dire need to change all that. He was trailing badly in the polls.
She changed those dynamics, she brought in money and she motivated a large part of the base. Her choice actually put him ahead in the polls and he essentially remained in the race until the banking crisis hit. Once all that drama occurred, no republican was going to win. But that there stuff is way too deep for the vettards of this world.
just a silly stupid man
he supports Obama, voted for him twice, has Joe Biden as his VP, and he tries to mock others. The working taxpaying society laughs at the vettards, literally true.
PS: even in this mocking post, I've actually brought more substance to the forum than a vettard can in a whole month.
This is how a sane man deals with being wrong in a thread he started in here. You should study it and embrace it. It might save you the ridicule that you constantly open yourself up for by doubling down on your original wrong statement.
Or not, and continue to get mocked.
Originally Posted by CHOPTALK I grew up a lot since I started this thread.
I changed my views on a lot of things since then.
This was almost 5 years ago.
Forgive my ignorance.
Im not going to sit here and say I was right with my comments.
I only read half the 1st page and I want to throw up.
I was wrong.
I am not afraid to admit that.
What specifically did Willy say that was wrong? What he just said about Sarah Palin in his post this morning was dead accurate. Yet you want him to apologize. For what?
Humored the Obama camp?
She gave McCain a huge boost in the polls.
And the Obama camp found that humorous?
What specifically did Willy say that was wrong? What he just said about Sarah Palin in his post this morning was dead accurate. Yet you want him to apologize. For what?
How about EVERYTHING: Not apologize, admit how wrong he was.
In only 36 hours, many have mocked her selection and made incredibly hypocritical accusations (have they no pride?).- WRONG.
I think she has the Obama camp scrambling back to the drawing board.- WRONG. Just kept on messaage and romped.
I think her selection has already changed the dynamics of the race.- WRONG.
I can't wait for time to do it's thing. WRONG, since he actually thought her nomination would change the race, which it clearly did not. 5 years later, she is a laughingstock and banished to wacko land and CPAT gatherings.
The problem is he doubles down on it 5 years later, instead of humbly admitting how wrong he was, and move on. That's why he constantly is the target of ridicule and will continue to be.
everything I said was totally accurate. She brought desperately needed money into the McCain camp, that's just a stone cold fact of life. She increased enthusiasm among his base, that's just another stone cold fact of life. Her nomination gave him a surge in the polls and gave his campaign a breath of life, just another stone cold fact.
the one thing I said that was / is an opinion is that nobody could help McCain overcome the banking drama. Once that happened, I don't think any republican could win. So you can disagree with me on that one issue. In every other issue I mentioned, I'm right and that's that.
now, one of the reasons this forum is so pathetic is because of silly stupid people like you. Your knowledge base simply lacks depth, you're a simpleton. When you hear Palin's name, you salivate like one of Pavlav's dogs, you're trained to think everything about her is bad without exception. You're a spoon fed 10 second soundbite voter. You're the reason politicians can and do act like they do, having no regard for the truth. You're literally a fucking cancer on society, and when combined with like thinking (an oxymoron) libtards, you become a toxic.
PS: no disrespect to dogs intended. I do appreciate the fact that they actually bring something of value to the table.
She never said she could see Russia from her house, you're thinking of Tina Fey.This thread does not even make Willie's top 100 worst threads list.
She did change the dynamics and time did do its thing.
The dynamics and the time doing its thing probably did not do what Willie had in mind but it did change the dynamics and time did its thing.
This thread was pre "I can see Rusia from my house therefore that makes me a great commander and chief" interview.
Its all Katie's fault.
She never said she could see Russia from her house, you're thinking of Tina Fey.
Correct, although she did say You can see Russia from parts of Alaska. And she was right. Guess who debunked the erroneous Palin quote. Snopes, bless their ever lovin unbiased hearts.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/seealaska.asp
???? What's wrong with that. It's an accurate view of what you see from the 2 vantage points referenced? Unless you've been up there and could tell us the view is different by personal experience?Yet snopes had to end withNeither of these viewpoints offers the observer much more than a glimpse of a vast, desolate expanse, however