"Do you get anything right?"
<< Given your incredibly long and hilariously wrong predictions re: the election,Gee, maybe you should gaze into a mirror when you say that...>>:nohead::missingte:toast::lolBIG::lol::tongue2:
aaahhhh so now neocons deduced themselves to fabricating even more bullshit. or how shall we say....SPIN. Now its all about "dumping" WMD's??? So you mean to tell me the worlds "most powerfull and mighty" military got its intelligence wrong??? Then now they aren't just incorrect; they're incompetent. Is that what your saying?
Sick jackal internet-geek frucks. Hundreds of thousands dead, a country destroyed , US military weakened, US world influence weakened, US citizen trust destroyed, and you have the Rovian draft dodging proud patriot revisionist balls to ask for 'links'? Have you no shame? Everybody reading this thread knows for a fact that the Bush Administration lied us into an oily Blackwater corporate profiteers disaster and yet you continue with your relentless spew to rewrite history. This isn't a second life 'LINK' game. An illiterate silver spoon war criminal president invaded and destroyed a sovereign nation and there are no links that can rewrite or help heal this harsh reality.
The written history from Blix is the history.
You can't deny it...and history won't deny it either.
Facts are facts. Blix made it clear Sadaam would not cooperate with UN inspections.
Case closed...fini...done.
YOu lose.
No. Being wrong does not necessarily equivocate to incompetence. The incompetence is found mostly in the spin you put on it when you use the word "lie." Considering our continuing presence in Iraq, I can see no possible benefit to your political characterizations and spins, especially now that the election is done with.
I think you may need to read up on the issue. Refresh your memory and you will find all the "incompetent" UN officials, diplomats and US Congressmen who "lied" too because they believed what they saw for themselves in the intelligence reports, and it had nothing to do with GW and you know it. Throw in the French, the Russians, the Chinese and our own CIA too. They were all on Sadam's ass about his WMD's and got the same answers from the investigations that everyone else had gotten. Everyone who was listening at the time and was paying attention remembers far more said about Iraq's antics aside from only what GW had spoken of, which by the way echoed UN resolutions practially down to the last word.
Remember all those payoffs and bribes between the Russians, the French and Saddam? Just for its own sake, what a filthy way to run a world. Your accusations about GW lying is pure spin and you know it. If he was lying, everyone was lying too, and even worse.
If that's spin, then where are the distortions? Everything that I said happened, happened just the way I said it did. Don't let the facts get in your way. There wasn't a shed of spin to anything I said. Funny how the simple truth gets pigeonholed as just more "spin." You are off your rocker if you can't tell the difference. And furthermore, if Bush and his advisors can come clean and admit they were wrong about things, you can admit that you were wrong and that they just missed the mark, that they were fooled, but did not lie about it.
And as far as the idea of competence goes, you and me and everyone else better hope that BO's policies don't end up in the "incompetent" round file too. That's what's on the table now and it is far more important than how you wish to continue to put your own spin on an outgoing administration.
No. Being wrong does not necessarily equivocate to incompetence. The incompetence is found mostly in the spin you put on it when you use the word "lie." Considering our continuing presence in Iraq, I can see no possible benefit to your political characterizations and spins, especially now that the election is done with.
I think you may need to read up on the issue. Refresh your memory and you will find all the "incompetent" UN officials, diplomats and US Congressmen who "lied" too because they believed what they saw for themselves in the intelligence reports, and it had nothing to do with GW and you know it. Throw in the French, the Russians, the Chinese and our own CIA too. They were all on Sadam's ass about his WMD's and got the same answers from the investigations that everyone else had gotten. Everyone who was listening at the time and was paying attention remembers far more said about Iraq's antics aside from only what GW had spoken of, which by the way echoed UN resolutions practially down to the last word.
Remember all those payoffs and bribes between the Russians, the French and Saddam? Just for its own sake, what a filthy way to run a world. Your accusations about GW lying is pure spin and you know it. If he was lying, everyone was lying too, and even worse.
If that's spin, then where are the distortions? Everything that I said happened, happened just the way I said it did. Don't let the facts get in your way. There wasn't a shed of spin to anything I said. Funny how the simple truth gets pigeonholed as just more "spin." You are off your rocker if you can't tell the difference. And furthermore, if Bush and his advisors can come clean and admit they were wrong about things, you can admit that you were wrong and that they just missed the mark, that they were fooled, but did not lie about it.
And as far as the idea of competence goes, you and me and everyone else better hope that BO's policies don't end up in the "incompetent" round file too. That's what's on the table now and it is far more important than how you wish to continue to put your own spin on an outgoing administration.
no, u lose, trick...blix and his inspectors only RECOMMENDED sanctions and NEVER concocted pictures to supposedly show mobile wmd stations which later proved to be nothing more than empty arm rigs which had been inspected previously by the UN inspectors...u are gonna sit here and defend the most scandalous and corrupt-ridden administration in the history of our country? for what, jackass? are u a racist? are u so to the right that u refuse to reason with FACTS (such as no WMD, that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, etc..)...i am a an original desert storm vet who thankfully got out before this latest ficaso based on oil, greed and plain old-fashioned terrorism interwined by the GOP and Paul Wolfitz (or whatever the fuck his name is)....your uncle w. lied...rove lied...their spin of an intelligence reports lied....they politicized the justice dept to make their case for the Patriot Act and "war" on terrorism in order to build up cheney's war defense (i.e profit sharing) chest.....do yourself a favor and turn the Fox channel off once in a while and drop your pants and see if u feel anything down there, jackass...for once think for yourself and let no other factor of which u have hatred for dis-illusion your thought process...:finger:
They killed Kennedy to have they're war and they blew up the WTC to have they're war. Without those 2 things happening you would'nt of had veitman or the iraq war.
Another 9-11 Wacko. Go figure...
Newfie Airliner
An airliner is coming into land at an airport obscured by fog. Visibility is practically nil, the ILS system is on the blink, so the newfie pilot has to land on wits alone.
"Flaps, check," he says to the co-pilot, "Landing Gear, check. Altitude, check. Right, we're going in. Hold on."
The plane lands and comes to a screeching, grinding halt; just short of the edge of the runway. "Holy Cow!" exclaims the pilot, "This must be the shortest runway I've ever landed on!"
The newfie co-pilot looks left and right and says "Yeah, and about the widest, too ..."