Public = bettors. Dude, you need to wake up and realize that only a small, small, small, small, small contingent of people actually have a plan when they're betting, and pick teams based of analysis. I'd say it's less than 2%.
Everyone else simply plays the favorite, or plays the team that is a huge dog. No one plays +4 in an basketball game. No one plays +2 in a football game. No one plays +150 in a baseball game. People here don't identify value, and when they think they do, they fall right into a trap.
There is one place where this forum is tracked - that's the tracking forum. The overall record of posters here is 2018-2137 (-$2549). That's no smarter than the "public", this forum IS the public.
You implied that people simply pick games at random, or because they like the team. That's not giving people enough credit. There is at least SOME thought that goes into a game, especially when you put $$$ on it.So what exactly is your point? First you say that I'm not giving bettors enough credit, then you turn around and say "public = bettors." So you want me to give the public more credit? You implied that they're more knowledgeable than I think, that they would have to know who Edwin Jackson is, etc., but now you're essentially saying that they're pretty clueless? You also said EXACTLY what I said about the public in regards to the fact that they don't analyze games, or crunch numbers, or look at factors like weather, umpires, etc.
You're probably right when you say that this forum IS the public. I was probably giving people HERE too much credit. So on that, I agree. As far as your other points though, it looks like you're backing up my initial argument.
But to get back to my original question, how can people be sure that the lines they are getting are accurate? If it's from a sportsbook, you have to immediately discount it. There is no way they are going to willingly give you info that would help beat them. If it's from some third party site, I still wouldn't trust it because the books could be paying them to release lines they want released. Maybe the lines are accurate, but I don't know how you could ever know that for sure. Especially when the lines vary so much from site to site.
Many sites. Covers.com has a consensus picks page, SportsInsights gives out percentages, as does SportsOptions.i have a question that i have been trying to find for a while, where do you find line movement and percentages of people betting on them??
You implied that people simply pick games at random, or because they like the team. That's not giving people enough credit. There is at least SOME thought that goes into a game, especially when you put $$$ on it.
Because someone knows who Edwin Jackson is, doesn't mean they make money gambling and we should follow them. Not difficult to understand my friend.
Giving out betting percentages aren't going to kill sportsbooks. Not even close. Sites have been tracking percentages given out by sportsbooks for years, and unless you've got a database of percentages, understand what certain percentages mean, there's no way to make money off it.
It's not hard to get. He's had one of these RLM threads for each sport since joining.
Rockies today qualified as a play.
http://www.sbrodds.com/#/odds/mlb/game/moneyline.html
Colorado Rockies
Opening Line (5dimes): -150
Closing Line (5dimes): -154
Percentage of bets on COL: 45%
New York Mets
Opening Line (5dimes): +140
Closing Line (5dimes): +144
Percentage of bets on NYM: 55%