Reverse Line Movement

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,942
Tokens
Public = bettors. Dude, you need to wake up and realize that only a small, small, small, small, small contingent of people actually have a plan when they're betting, and pick teams based of analysis. I'd say it's less than 2%.

Everyone else simply plays the favorite, or plays the team that is a huge dog. No one plays +4 in an basketball game. No one plays +2 in a football game. No one plays +150 in a baseball game. People here don't identify value, and when they think they do, they fall right into a trap.

There is one place where this forum is tracked - that's the tracking forum. The overall record of posters here is 2018-2137 (-$2549). That's no smarter than the "public", this forum IS the public.

So what exactly is your point? First you say that I'm not giving bettors enough credit, then you turn around and say "public = bettors." So you want me to give the public more credit? You implied that they're more knowledgeable than I think, that they would have to know who Edwin Jackson is, etc., but now you're essentially saying that they're pretty clueless? You also said EXACTLY what I said about the public in regards to the fact that they don't analyze games, or crunch numbers, or look at factors like weather, umpires, etc.

You're probably right when you say that this forum IS the public. I was probably giving people HERE too much credit. So on that, I agree. As far as your other points though, it looks like you're backing up my initial argument.

But to get back to my original question, how can people be sure that the lines they are getting are accurate? If it's from a sportsbook, you have to immediately discount it. There is no way they are going to willingly give you info that would help beat them. If it's from some third party site, I still wouldn't trust it because the books could be paying them to release lines they want released. Maybe the lines are accurate, but I don't know how you could ever know that for sure. Especially when the lines vary so much from site to site.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
So what exactly is your point? First you say that I'm not giving bettors enough credit, then you turn around and say "public = bettors." So you want me to give the public more credit? You implied that they're more knowledgeable than I think, that they would have to know who Edwin Jackson is, etc., but now you're essentially saying that they're pretty clueless? You also said EXACTLY what I said about the public in regards to the fact that they don't analyze games, or crunch numbers, or look at factors like weather, umpires, etc.

You're probably right when you say that this forum IS the public. I was probably giving people HERE too much credit. So on that, I agree. As far as your other points though, it looks like you're backing up my initial argument.

But to get back to my original question, how can people be sure that the lines they are getting are accurate? If it's from a sportsbook, you have to immediately discount it. There is no way they are going to willingly give you info that would help beat them. If it's from some third party site, I still wouldn't trust it because the books could be paying them to release lines they want released. Maybe the lines are accurate, but I don't know how you could ever know that for sure. Especially when the lines vary so much from site to site.
You implied that people simply pick games at random, or because they like the team. That's not giving people enough credit. There is at least SOME thought that goes into a game, especially when you put $$$ on it.

Because someone knows who Edwin Jackson is, doesn't mean they make money gambling and we should follow them. Not difficult to understand my friend.

Giving out betting percentages aren't going to kill sportsbooks. Not even close. Sites have been tracking percentages given out by sportsbooks for years, and unless you've got a database of percentages, understand what certain percentages mean, there's no way to make money off it.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
75
Tokens
i have a question that i have been trying to find for a while, where do you find line movement and percentages of people betting on them??
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
i have a question that i have been trying to find for a while, where do you find line movement and percentages of people betting on them??
Many sites. Covers.com has a consensus picks page, SportsInsights gives out percentages, as does SportsOptions.

However for this I use SBRodds.com as I know the book that gives out the percentage, and the book that moves the line. Other sites take percentages from a combination of books and you don't have as good of an understanding of where the "sharp" money is.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,942
Tokens
You implied that people simply pick games at random, or because they like the team. That's not giving people enough credit. There is at least SOME thought that goes into a game, especially when you put $$$ on it.

Because someone knows who Edwin Jackson is, doesn't mean they make money gambling and we should follow them. Not difficult to understand my friend.

Giving out betting percentages aren't going to kill sportsbooks. Not even close. Sites have been tracking percentages given out by sportsbooks for years, and unless you've got a database of percentages, understand what certain percentages mean, there's no way to make money off it.

Well, I think we're speaking two different languages. I never said that every single person who bets on a game doesn't put any thought into it. Not at all. I was simply disagreeing with you when you said that you found it hard to believe that people would bet on a game pretty much blindly. You said you were pretty certain that they would at least know something about the opposing pitcher. I was just saying that, at least from my experience, I know there are people who DO bet on games without knowing anything about the opposing pitcher. It may sound foolish and hard to believe, but trust me, there are guys who do it. And one only has to look at the amount of people on this site, or other sites, who blindly tail people on their plays.

As for percentages, I think a lot of people would disagree with you that you can't make money simply by seeing where the money is going and how much of it is going where. I'm not saying it's an exact science or that I'm one of those people, but there are tons of people who play line movement only, and don't even look at the teams playing. Some of those people are very good at making bets that way. That's why I find it hard to believe that the books wouldn't have an interest when it comes to posting the percentages.

At any rate, I honestly didn't mean for this to become a big thing and I wasn't trying to stir the pot or anything like that. And I do agree with you that following line movement, and making plays based upon that movement, can be profitable.

Nice job on your plays so far. GL going forward.
 

ray

New member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
1,057
Tokens
the % switched over in favor of ChiSox 30 mins ago but back on Detroit so it's not RLM as of right now...Also the ML for Detroit went up to -140 but dropped in the last 10 minutes.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
266
Tokens
Thanks for letting us know of the possibility. The line would have to had gone over -143 (at 5dimes) for it to have been an RLM. When I checked it 20 minutes ago the lines was at -129
 

New member
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
1,654
Tokens
It's not hard to get. He's had one of these RLM threads for each sport since joining.

Rockies today qualified as a play.

http://www.sbrodds.com/#/odds/mlb/game/moneyline.html

Colorado Rockies

Opening Line (5dimes): -150
Closing Line (5dimes): -154
Percentage of bets on COL: 45%

New York Mets

Opening Line (5dimes): +140
Closing Line (5dimes): +144
Percentage of bets on NYM: 55%
 

Dice, Sports & Cocktails
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
13,721
Tokens
It's not hard to get. He's had one of these RLM threads for each sport since joining.

Rockies today qualified as a play.

http://www.sbrodds.com/#/odds/mlb/game/moneyline.html

Colorado Rockies

Opening Line (5dimes): -150
Closing Line (5dimes): -154
Percentage of bets on COL: 45%

New York Mets

Opening Line (5dimes): +140
Closing Line (5dimes): +144
Percentage of bets on NYM: 55%


Are you saying that Five dimes is the book supllying SBR with the % numbers or is that just the trigger book?

Also did Arizona fit as an RLM?

because they fit my other system.

powerz
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
Arizona did not fit. Showing 37% on them (the dog).

Only play was Colorado (loser).

Updated record: 14-5.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,923
Messages
13,575,286
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com