Hmmm, I've played in a ton of league over the years and NEVER have we played where the lowest PIM won the category. Thats the beauty of the PIM category. You pick a guy like Carcillo or Laraque and he racks up the PIM's but they rarely score you goals or points of any kind. They never play the PP. So your hoping your guy goes out there that night with a wild hair up his ass. That's also why a guy like Iginla is so valuable. He can throw down AND he can lead your team in just about every other category.
Ok here goes
I agree with the Veto--I changed it to 6 owners needed to veto
Playoffs changed to 6 teams this is 3 weeks of games. The top 2 have byes in week 1. Each playoff series is 1 week-even the championship--there is no way I see to make it 2
Here is a proposal for # of players
C-2 LW-2 RW-2 D-4 Util-2 G-2 Bench-6 IR-1
this puts 20 on each team
Categories I think we all want:
Goals Assisists +/- PIM PPG FaceoffsWon for Skaters
Wins Shutouts Sv% GAA for Goalies
this is 10
I also like Game winning goals and shots on goal for skaters
Do we want 82 game limits or limit the number of transactions??
Want to have these done by tomorrow so everyone knows what they are.
These really don't put any at an advantage--lets make this as simple-but fun as possible!!
Thoughts??
I agree with the Veto--I changed it to 6 owners needed to veto
Playoffs changed to 6 teams this is 3 weeks of games. The top 2 have byes in week 1. Each playoff series is 1 week-even the championship--there is no way I see to make it 2
Here is a proposal for # of players
C-2 LW-2 RW-2 D-4 Util-2 G-2 Bench-6 IR-1
this puts 20 on each team
Categories I think we all want:
Goals Assisists +/- PIM PPG FaceoffsWon for Skaters
Wins Shutouts Sv% GAA for Goalies
this is 10
I also like Game winning goals and shots on goal for skaters
Do we want 82 game limits or limit the number of transactions??
Want to have these done by tomorrow so everyone knows what they are.
These really don't put any at an advantage--lets make this as simple-but fun as possible!!
Thoughts??
In response to WW's post
Those ten categories are agreeable to us all, I believe
I think SOG is more interesting than GWG. Selecting just one would give us 11 categories and thus little chance of a H2H tie for a given week.
Finally, I personally prefer Maximum Games at 82 rather than limiting transactions.
Those ten categories are agreeable to us all, I believe
I think SOG is more interesting than GWG. Selecting just one would give us 11 categories and thus little chance of a H2H tie for a given week.
Finally, I personally prefer Maximum Games at 82 rather than limiting transactions.
The 10 categories is cool with me.
I, for one, Have zero problems with ties. In fact it makes the race all that more exciting and way less chance of teams tying with the same record in the end. So I'm actually FOR leaving 10 categories. Yahoo has a standard tie breaking system..Win first I believe then maybe head to head. I'm sure ESPN has the same. This can easaly be looked up.
Max games at 82.
I think there should be some sort of limit on transactions. Even if its high. As I stated earlier I got burned last season by a guy changing his lineup everyday. How about 100?
I, for one, Have zero problems with ties. In fact it makes the race all that more exciting and way less chance of teams tying with the same record in the end. So I'm actually FOR leaving 10 categories. Yahoo has a standard tie breaking system..Win first I believe then maybe head to head. I'm sure ESPN has the same. This can easaly be looked up.
Max games at 82.
I think there should be some sort of limit on transactions. Even if its high. As I stated earlier I got burned last season by a guy changing his lineup everyday. How about 100?
