Poll: Who is *Officially* the most useless poster in here

Search
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
And just how many voters are needed to make it legit? Since 51 isn't enough, what is?

When you vote it becomes legit.

Both polls are farcical. Essentially, you have a poll that is dominated by ghosts, and a poll that is dominated by fear of alienating your conservative/liberal buddies.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
You tell me, since you seem to be so concerned about it?
Lol, I'm just making fun of you because you act like such a child on here. You are here updated this ridiculous poll as if it really means something to you. And isn't that what you want, for everyone to be concerned about it? Eventually this thread will have more views than the other one and you will be jumping for joy over it and telling Vit how your poll has more views than the other one. Keep it up Zit, you look more foolish every day on here.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,023
Tokens
Lol, I'm just making fun of you because you act like such a child on here. You are here updated this ridiculous poll as if it really means something to you. And isn't that what you want, for everyone to be concerned about it? Eventually this thread will have more views than the other one and you will be jumping for joy over it and telling Vit how your poll has more views than the other one. Keep it up Zit, you look more foolish every day on here.

I'm just wondering if it ever occurred to you that half the shit I post in here is tongue-in-cheek?

Just wondering. Lol.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
Post 1, and every post thereafter by Welching Zit referring to "unnamed person" or whatever other stupid substitute he's using for Aki. Clearly violates #3.

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by festeringZit
Let's try this again. This is how I'm proposing it should go.

1. You get to vote for 1st, 2nd and 3rd place (10 points, 6 points, 3 points)
2. You can change your vote at any time.
3. You can vote for the same person for all 3 places if you like
4. The totals will be recalculated every time someone votes
5. It's obviously a public poll since it's not done using the vbulletin polling functionality

There are some really stupid people that post here, but I think we should concentrate on calling out
frequent posters.

My votes:
1. Guesser (10 points)
2. UnNamed Poster (5 points)
3. Vitterd (3 points)

(Those who have been here a while will understand #2)


CLEARLY a violation of #3. If Zit has ANY personal integrity at all, he's gone from Poly and Rubber Room until 03/10/16. But of course, he's a liar, and he has zero personal integrity or honesty, and he'll stay here, and the sick sheep cult will back him. So Aki, feel free to mention the liar's name, post in his threads, and whatever else, since the vermin has violated the bet and is welching. Just when you think he can't go lower, he does.
I'm always prepared to be pleasantly surprised, and he'll man up and be gone for a year, like Vit and even Dave did when they self banned and showed integrity.

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by festeringZit
I'd rather the bet be that you'll ban yourself for a year, if:

1. You respond to any post I make
2. You post in any thread I create
3. You mention my name in any way

So basically he makes the agreement and later refers to AKI as "Un named poster" as a poster to vote for and he violates #3 when mentioning my name in any way. To me this may have a strong case. What do people think? Do people think this is a violation of the agreement? Maybe this should be the next poll?
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
So basically he makes the agreement and later refers to AKI as "Un named poster" as a poster to vote for and he violates #3 when mentioning my name in any way. To me this may have a strong case. What do people think? Do people think this is a violation of the agreement? Maybe this should be the next poll?

It violates the spirit of the agreement for sure.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,670
Tokens
So basically he makes the agreement and later refers to AKI as "Un named poster" as a poster to vote for and he violates #3 when mentioning my name in any way. To me this may have a strong case. What do people think? Do people think this is a violation of the agreement? Maybe this should be the next poll?

"UnNamed poster" isn't a violation.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,023
Tokens
So basically he makes the agreement and later refers to AKI as "Un named poster" as a poster to vote for and he violates #3 when mentioning my name in any way. To me this may have a strong case. What do people think? Do people think this is a violation of the agreement? Maybe this should be the next poll?

Too bad lying scymfuck Guesser is lying by omission here. If you actually read through this brillian5 thread you'd see that I got permission to do what I did. That us only one of the key facts you are missing. Don"t waste your time on this one, there is nothing there despite what the lying sewer rat tries to dredge up.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,670
Tokens
Too bad lying scymfuck Guesser is lying by omission here. If you actually read through this brillian5 thread you'd see that I got permission to do what I did. That us only one of the key facts you are missing. Don"t waste your time on this one, there is nothing there despite what the lying sewer rat tries to dredge up.

Spammy the Sewer Rat yet again proves his presence here is a waste of bandwidth.

toddler-ride-on-trucks.jpg
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
Too bad lying scymfuck Guesser is lying by omission here. If you actually read through this brillian5 thread you'd see that I got permission to do what I did. That us only one of the key facts you are missing. Don"t waste your time on this one, there is nothing there despite what the lying sewer rat tries to dredge up.

Yes post 96 and some of the posts by un named poster clears it up.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
I'm just wondering if it ever occurred to you that half the shit I post in here is tongue-in-cheek?

Just wondering. Lol.
So the quote of yours I posted above you made to BP in another thread was tongue-in-cheek and you basically calling him an idiot was tongue-in-cheek? Because I doubt BP took it that way.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
Easy there, Tiger. Who pissed in your cheerios?
I understand you meant it as a joke and I apologize, but why even insinuate that MY vote would be some kind of deciding vote? I'm not the only one who thinks this(and every other poll on this site) is a complete joke.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
I understand you meant it as a joke and I apologize, but why even insinuate that MY vote would be some kind of deciding vote? I'm not the only one who thinks this(and every other poll on this site) is a complete joke.

You asked a rhetorical question, so I decided why not give a smart ass answer. No harm intended. I apologize if I offended you. Also, if you read the entirety of my post, I said both polls are farcical.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Too bad lying scymfuck Guesser is lying by omission here. If you actually read through this brillian5 thread you'd see that I got permission to do what I did. That us only one of the key facts you are missing. Don"t waste your time on this one, there is nothing there despite what the lying sewer rat tries to dredge up.

95 posts after you violated the agreement, Welcher, out of the goodness of Aki's heart. Prior to that post he said you CLEARLY violated the agreement, and CLEARLY should self ban for a year.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
So basically he makes the agreement and later refers to AKI as "Un named poster" as a poster to vote for and he violates #3 when mentioning my name in any way. To me this may have a strong case. What do people think? Do people think this is a violation of the agreement? Maybe this should be the next poll?

Of course it is, but just like this joke of a poll, you'll have the Cultists down here voting on it and dominating it, and they do not care about Truth or Integrity, they just care about lying to protect their own. Aki himself said he was violating the agreement and should be self banned.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,023
Tokens
Of course it is, but just like this joke of a poll, you'll have the Cultists down here voting on it and dominating it, and they do not care about Truth or Integrity, they just care about lying to protect their own. Aki himself said he was violating the agreement and should be self banned.

There's a lot more to the story that you're conveniently lying (by omission) about. I can't get into it because you'll again accuse me of violating the bet.
Bottom line is, you're the only one creating faux-drama over this, because you are a fucking sewer rat and a vile scumbag with no integrity,
and everyone in here knows it, which is why you're the only scummmmmbag in here prancing around like a fucking drama-queen with
his panties in a wad.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,121,026
Messages
13,590,282
Members
101,045
Latest member
nigeldee
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com