I guess I disagree on that in this instance.. this was in South Carolina where race is a major issue. People are more likely to take that extreme stance there than other parts of the country. not that it's more racist, I believe it's they are just more used to the conversation and thus more likely to say their opinion no matter how extreme outsiders may feel..
Also, It's just one part of the picture. So You and I agree on that basic point, and I'm not just searching for data that agrees. I'm just pulling data. We have an opinion that this is true, and these polls agree...
These are also very different polls that paint the same picture that you and me see.. Yougov was an online poll done before Iowa... The latest example was SC exit poll and they are basically saying the same thing...
that is like asking, If you like Lady Gaga, are you bothered by the associations that come along with 1/3rd of her fans?
you shouldn't support something because of who else supports it, imagine saying, "I would like lady gaga but all her fans are gay (or black, or retarded, or mexican or KKK)"
it's ok for people that believe in different things to have things in common.
well said, but I think it's different when you're talking ideologys of a person. you're voting on a person based on politics, beliefs, character, leadership ect.. the difference is not as simple as what music you are listening too..
I get your point, it's a strong one.. I just know I'd at some point question my opinion if I was a trump supporter. Maybe it would change my mind, maybe it wouldn't...
not even close to true... a mile off..
Last Presidential election, Romney received 17% of the minority vote.. Minorities only made up 26% of the overall vote... So Romney recieved 17% of the 26% and you say that the most Bigoted (my bias) Presidential Candidate in recent history, that 1/3rd of his supports will be minorities????
it's no different than what any other politician has done throughout history to get elected.
hitler did it in germany
clinton and trump are doing it now
clinton is the expert... she can pander to both sides, one day she'll speak at a wall street event and pocket millions in support, the next day she's sitting in a blue collar diner telling the folks how she's gonna hold wall st accountable... that's why the kids support bernie they watch that damn youtube all day and know when someone is full of shit.
hitler did it in germany
clinton and trump are doing it now
clinton is the expert... she can pander to both sides, one day she'll speak at a wall street event and pocket millions in support, the next day she's sitting in a blue collar diner telling the folks how she's gonna hold wall st accountable... that's why the kids support bernie they watch that damn youtube all day and know when someone is full of shit.
Defying, don't you think Trump will represent the repubs in the Nov elections?
These parties at the Nash Equilibrium at this point. Looking back, the system was pretty much dying for someone like Trump and even Sanders to step in and shake things up.
Tough to predict if this cycle is an anomaly or the start of something new, but with the media/internet landscape being what it is, you can go outside the traditional institutional organization that candidates needed in the past.
Then again economic/safety anxieties feed political extremism, so the system might have legs.
Yup......the internet has sharpened the younger generation minds as far as what's going on in politics & who to vote for while TV turns people minds into mush. Especially the older generations, the lies you hear on TV that the older generations fall for.......on the internet, we all have a say, & can talk bout the BS being thrown out by all these politicians.......the younger generation is always online, & can filter thru all the BS.
I'm talking bout here in the US or in Europe, where the internet isn't controlled like it is in China.
