<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wantitall4moi:
Iron, I can only assume that by looking for "value" you are talkiing strictly football here.
In basea they have the best lines 75% of the time one way. So if you are not betting into Pin's lines you are not getting the "best value".
But if you say that you are using Pin's numbers as a bnechmark and taking the better number anti-Pin, then you must have more magic than me, because I have yet to find a way to determine (fool proof) when or even IF Pin is begging on a number and thus it is a "loser". But when they have the best numbers both ways it is hard for me to see if they are getting more action one way, backing one side or anther, or simply hanging a number that is better by deafult due to their lower holds.
There are the obvious ones that stick out BECAUSE they go off track, but even on those I have not found a pattern. When I get back to Vegas and see all my back resords I will double check it all, but back in June when I was there I wnet through most of it when this debate flared up thean, and didnt see anything concrete.
But that is the beauty of bases, the MLs can make it easy to win being right only 45-50% of the time. So even if you are "wrong" more than half the time you can still profit. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I can agree to disagree with you. Can you? Or will you continue to insist that I pick sides and approach wagering the same way you do? And continue to form arguments based on that false assumption? It is getting annoying.
I should have known that this thread would attract every single person that ever won a nickel from Pinnacle or got good number. LMFAO!
I'm the idiot for starting the knucklebrained thread.
Good luck with your method. Congrats.
