Well said ! Super Bowl teams seldom repeat as We all know. Pressure is on them and everyone is out to get them. However I'm a firm believer that it is unwise to have your starting QB rest for 3 weeks as Rodgers did. That is why that game scared me and I stated so before the game. I backed it up with some very nice futures wagers on the Giants at 60/1 SB and 25/1 NFC. Don't even bother to respond to that guy as He is always negative and talks big smack after the fact. Everybody is a genius after the scores are posted ... right ?
I was talking about the packers shit defense for weeks. Pay attention homer.
Not to mention you can follow that link in my sig and see Giants +7.5, giants ML +185. LOL AFTER THE SCORES ARE POSTED
"You could say every team but the Super Bowl champion is overrated..."
Big difference between winning super bowl previous year and losing in conference round or super bowl...and winning super bowl previous year, being sucked off by everyone all year, then being ONE AND DONE
get it through your thick skull....ONE AND DONE
knucklhead is far from a genius, his record for the year after his brilliant Giants pick is 2011 NFL Year-to-date: 40-46-2 (47%) -2.31 units looks like another wannabe tout ! Would be emberrased to put this kind of record in a picks forum and brag on a thread how he knows the sport.... LOL Hope posters haven't been tailing this fool.......
I dont think they were overrated at all. They had what I like to call "Colts Syndrome" Amazing regular season causing an extended break for starters ultimately leading to a shit playoff game where you watch a team that looks completely opposite from what the last 17 weeks has shown.
And the Giants were prepared for the Pack and played a much better game.
And the Giants were prepared for the Pack and played a much better game.
Hey Kermie...Refresh your memory?
LOL Remember when you said this, got called out for blatantly lying, disappeared for a few days, then came back acting like it never happened?
Ring a bell?
The bare minimum of fact checking would have shown you that I had Giants +7.5 and Giants ML posted well before the "scores were posted"
Pick better spots, old man.
LOL Remember when you said this, got called out for blatantly lying, disappeared for a few days, then came back acting like it never happened?
Ring a bell?
The bare minimum of fact checking would have shown you that I had Giants +7.5 and Giants ML posted well before the "scores were posted"
Pick better spots, old man.
When someone makes so many stupid statements like you do... all you can do is change the subject. If the Packers are over rated after going 15-2 this year .. What does that make you ? 40-46-2 is a tad worse than 15-2 Keep changing the subject but you are " Over Rated " and all your double talk will never change that.:lolBIG:
Be a bigger hypocrite?
The topic of the thread is the packers. you got owned talked about that, so you changed the subject to me always being negative, and pretending to be an "expert" after the "final scores are posted"
Then you got owned on that because you didn't realize that I've been talking about how the Packers are going to lose for weeks, and I also had Giants + 7.5 and the ML +285, so you changed the subject again - AFTER LEAVING THE THREAD FOR A FEW DAYS as if somehow that absolves you from being a made a fool before
So now you changed the subject to my winning percentage for this season, ignoring the 2 previous years, and ignoring the fact that i am only down 2 units this year regardless of percentage, and ignoring the fact that i am up 35 units total the last 3 seasons which is when i started documenting publicly
What are you going to change the subject to next?
BTW, it is extremely pathetic for you crusty old trolls to selectively nitpick someone's handicapping record who actually has the balls to publicly document their plays
Unlike....YOU.
Are we supposed to take your word for it that you crusty old trolls are very successful handicappers? Right...
