Obama dancing the night away while Ferguson burns and the world is in turmoil - detached inc.

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
I'm curious: does the fact that the guy who emptied his gun into an unharmed kid didn't know anything about a robbery change anybody's opinion who was running off at the mouth about that robbery? I'm guessing it doesn't...

http://www.latimes.com/nation/natio...ooting-police-name-20140815-story.html#page=1

You just don't get it. What our opinions are is not even relevent. You are trying to be a judge and jury just like Obama. You are even trying to prejudge posters who have not said what you want them to say. It will all come out in the end. You are the one running off at the mouth and putting words into other people's mouths. You are fishing for opinions, stupid and political all the way. My only problem with the whole thing is Obama's comments which were un-Presidential but typically political as always. He has to interject himself into lesser incidents and blow them up to be much bigger than they are i.e. the Harvard prof and Trayvon.

Chew on this. The cop did not know about the robbery but the kid did. Don't you think that affected the way he dealt with the cop from the outset. If you will flip that coin over you will see their is a tails side too. Liberals think in terms of black and white (literally in this case). There is more gray in cases like this and prejudging comes from those who have closed minds and are looking at it from a political point of view. This incident has nothing to do with politics but liberals have to Alinsky up any time they have a chance.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
all the proof you need for that is this here poli forum. people can't have a discussion without being labeled an anti-semite or a racist even without any overt tone or word being used. guys like scott, comrade, carminethewop, gtc, and akphi just troll around tossing out those terms to keep from actually having logical discussions about subjects because they lack objectivity and the grey matter to comprehend opposing view points. It's basically dealing with the most insecure 17 year old you've ever met....but a whole group of them on the same forum? awesome

in 2014 america it's easier to label than discuss. not sure i'd blame obama for that one though...

Said the hypocrite who can't discuss and only labels. See that 'X' in the upper right hand corner........
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You just don't get it. What our opinions are is not even relevent. You are trying to be a judge and jury just like Obama. You are even trying to prejudge posters who have not said what you want them to say. It will all come out in the end. You are the one running off at the mouth and putting words into other people's mouths. You are fishing for opinions, stupid and political all the way. My only problem with the whole thing is Obama's comments which were un-Presidential but typically political as always. He has to interject himself into lesser incidents and blow them up to be much bigger than they are i.e. the Harvard prof and Trayvon.

Chew on this. The cop did not know about the robbery but the kid did. Don't you think that affected the way he dealt with the cop from the outset. If you will flip that coin over you will see their is a tails side too. Liberals think in terms of black and white (literally in this case). There is more gray in cases like this and prejudging comes from those who have closed minds and are looking at it from a political point of view. This incident has nothing to do with politics but liberals have to Alinsky up any time they have a chance.

You can't fix stupid, and you just proved it for the umpteenth time. Where exactly did I put "...words into other people's mouths," you brain dead old schmuck? I reported what the Jefferson police official said. I don't know if it affected the way the kid dealt with the cop, but I DO know that if you only suspect somebody of jaywalking, they are unarmed, and have their hands up, they shouldn't have a gun full of bullets emptied into them. You're as stupid as the Missouri district attorney,who, I predict, is gonna be out of job in the not too distant future.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
well, he's a politician...that's all he knows. as i've told anyone who's willing to listen NEVER elect a lifelong politician or a senator that wasn't at least a governor or in the private sector. all you get is political rhetoric from a teleprompter

labeling, both on this forum and in this country, has spiraled out of control. and its always from either stupid people that can't even approach a debate or from loons that have their minds so made up on a subject that facts will never sway them (see akphi on global warming and ever obama lover in 2008). much easier to dismiss someone with a bs label...

There are no facts that disprove global warming. Maybe you should look in the mirror.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
I'm curious: does the fact that the guy who emptied his gun into an unharmed kid didn't know anything about a robbery change anybody's opinion who was running off at the mouth about that robbery? I'm guessing it doesn't...

http://www.latimes.com/nation/natio...ooting-police-name-20140815-story.html#page=1

Um, there is no "fact" that anyone "emptied their gun" into anyone or anything.

See stupid, the Police Chief said today that between 4-6 shots were fired. Realizing you know nothing about firearms, let me help you.

The standard issue police sidearm is going to have 10+1 or 12+1 both of which are greater than 4-6

Further, whether or not the deceased young man was "armed" or "unarmed" is irrelevant to the matter.

You may want to stop commenting. This is embarrassing.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
but I DO know that if you only suspect somebody of jaywalking, they are unarmed, and have their hands up, they shouldn't have a gun full of bullets emptied into them.

Hey imbecile:

Nobody had a "gun full of bullets" emptied into them.

"Suspected of J-walking" is speculation, not fact.

"Arms up" is speculation, not fact.

Again, you may want to stop commenting as your posts are embarrassingly stupid.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
You can't fix stupid, and you just proved it for the umpteenth time. Where exactly did I put "...words into other people's mouths," you brain dead old schmuck? I reported what the Jefferson police official said. I don't know if it affected the way the kid dealt with the cop, but I DO know that if you only suspect somebody of jaywalking, they are unarmed, and have their hands up, they shouldn't have a gun full of bullets emptied into them. You're as stupid as the Missouri district attorney,who, I predict, is gonna be out of job in the not too distant future.



"change anybody's opinion who was running off at the mouth about that robbery" (Datard) So you are saying that I have an opinion (i.e. running off at the mouth) when I have said just sit back and let them sort out the facts. It is you who is running off at the mouth (typical) You put words into peoples mouths by saying that they wouldn't change their minds based on what you posted. Climb back in your hole dude, sunlight is more than you can cope with. Keep wearing those dark glasses 24 7. You are expressing an opinion not only about the incident but those who you think would defend the cop. Who in this thread has defended the cop. You are accepting only what you want to hear. When it comes to stupid you are in class all of your own. You are the MOLE MAN in my opinion. Brain dead would be a step up for you. You are already making predictions about a district attorney and you don't even have all the facts. Crawl back in you hole MOLE MAN. LOL
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Um, there is no "fact" that anyone "emptied their gun" into anyone or anything.

See stupid, the Police Chief said today that between 4-6 shots were fired. Realizing you know nothing about firearms, let me help you.

The standard issue police sidearm is going to have 10+1 or 12+1 both of which are greater than 4-6

Further, whether or not the deceased young man was "armed" or "unarmed" is irrelevant to the matter.

You may want to stop commenting. This is embarrassing.

I'm not stupid ANYTHING, Scumbag, YOU are the nitwit infecting the forum with up to 9 consecutive posts talking to yourself. Multiple witnesses have already stated that he was shot numerous times, and the Ferguson police's refusal to definitively state how many shots WERE fired-which is standard in cases like this-does little to dispute that notion. Furthermore, are you really going to make the distinction between being shot 6 times and 12 times? Ahhh, but I've saved the best for last:

"Further, whether or not the deceased young man was "armed" or "unarmed" is irrelevant to the matter."

You are a moron of epic proportions. THAT comment sticks out like a turd in a punch bowl, YOU are the one who is embarrassing yourself, Schmuck.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
"change anybody's opinion who was running off at the mouth about that robbery" (Datard) So you are saying that I have an opinion (i.e. running off at the mouth) when I have said just sit back and let them sort out the facts. It is you who is running off at the mouth (typical) You put words into peoples mouths by saying that they wouldn't change their minds based on what you posted. Climb back in your hole dude, sunlight is more than you can cope with. Keep wearing those dark glasses 24 7. You are expressing an opinion not only about the incident but those who you think would defend the cop. Who in this thread has defended the cop. You are accepting only what you want to hear. When it comes to stupid you are in class all of your own. You are the MOLE MAN in my opinion. Brain dead would be a step up for you. You are already making predictions about a district attorney and you don't even have all the facts. Crawl back in you hole MOLE MAN. LOL

You need to get over yourself, you brain dead old prick, I didn't specifically name you, so STFU. And, yes, I AM expressing an opinion, but I repeat, show me where I put words in anybody's mouth. You didn't respond because you cannot do so, you're not only an old fool, you're a liar as well, and, as far as being stupid, YOU are the schmuck who made a complete and utter fool of himself for a year or so re: the 2012 election. I have the facts that idiot district attorney, along with the Ferguson union shill, was virtually the only person involved who thought getting the highway patrol involved instead of those boobs in the Ferguson police force was a bad idea. Your stupidity is stupefying, go sit on an oil derrick...
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Datard: You are not worth the effort. Brain dead, you all the way. Alinsky is all you got.....brain dead old prick, STFU, old fool, liar, stupid, schmuck, fool, stupidity. What a vocabulary. I can't believe they still allow you to post on here. Substance is beyond your reach. You have some real problems dude, pathetic.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Criminality and looting, trouble makers, now at this moment. This is far beyond a civil protest at the shooting. At this moment stand-off between police and looters.

People on the back of this shooting looking for trouble,determined to riot. They have no concern for the cause of the shot person.


The point has been made , not only is the President involved, but the whole world is watching. Pathetic.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
When has rioting, looting and violence ever solved anything??

Whats the point?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Just a sickening case for Democrats to back. It's repulsive to hear Al Sharpton and his cohorts talk about this guys robbery of this store like it's no big deal. That is savage behavior. And they have the audacity to go back to that store to loot it some more. Disgraceful. Fuck this nice police bullshit. Show the rioters whose boss and what happens when they fuck with the police. No need for this soft police presence. Bring back the swat, the tear gas, rubber bullets, and defend these innocent business owners. Just a disgraceful situation.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Sharpton is, was, and always will be a clown, and a professional racist. He preys on weakness and tragedy, basically an ambulance chaser except not as a lawyer. When a family loses their child, or suffers some other traumatic event, they aren't thinking rationally, and Al swoops in. Rational, common sense people of all parties know this, but he doesn't prey on the rational.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
I'm not stupid ANYTHING, Scumbag, YOU are the nitwit infecting the forum with up to 9 consecutive posts talking to yourself. Multiple witnesses have already stated that he was shot numerous times, and the Ferguson police's refusal to definitively state how many shots WERE fired-which is standard in cases like this-does little to dispute that notion. Furthermore, are you really going to make the distinction between being shot 6 times and 12 times? Ahhh, but I've saved the best for last:

"Further, whether or not the deceased young man was "armed" or "unarmed" is irrelevant to the matter."

You are a moron of epic proportions. THAT comment sticks out like a turd in a punch bowl, YOU are the one who is embarrassing yourself, Schmuck.

You are an absolute dumb fuck.

I did not attempt to make any "distinction" between 6 or 12 shots. I clearly said that nobody "emptied the gun" as you stupidly asserted (twice). Since you are laughably wrong you're attempting to change the subject.

As to your stupid claim regarding the number of shots fired: "The documents said four to six shots were fired." [Note the police are saying how many shots were fired]

Again, you can not "empty your gun" with 4-6 shots. Idiot.

Finally, your stupid screeching about "unarmed" is hysterical. You can't even make any point about it which is why you're left shouting "unarmed" and ZOMG YOU'RE LIKE SO STOOOOPID!!!! for saying that.

Whether or not the deceased young man was unarmed isn't relevant to events at all.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
It is laugh until you cry funny that this dafinch idiot thinks that "unarmed" is some big fact in this case.

Hilarious.

Remember,

According to police accounts on Sunday, Brown fought with a Ferguson officer over the officer's gun in a police car, and at least one shot was fired within the car.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Owners of SAMs Meat Market defending their store because they say police won't

BvJ3kBKIMAAMjvp.png



The police have been told to stand down, apparently. Was reported by local news outlets last night that "St. Louis County Police say they were told to stand down by the Missouri State Highway Patrol"

That's how the Democrats running Missouri roll...
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Sharpton is, was, and always will be a clown, and a professional racist. He preys on weakness and tragedy, basically an ambulance chaser except not as a lawyer. When a family loses their child, or suffers some other traumatic event, they aren't thinking rationally, and Al swoops in. Rational, common sense people of all parties know this, but he doesn't prey on the rational.

He is an old school race baiter. I agree with everything you said.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,986
Messages
13,575,785
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com