NYPD finally fires the tyrant

[Pulledclear]

He was a model citizen. Emphasis on WAS.

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

All this talk but nobody knows what crime he committed. Interesting stuff

 

[Enfuego]

All this talk but nobody knows what crime he committed. Interesting stuff

Again, for the 100th time, let me go real slow.

When the cops saw a fight on the sidewalk, they had no idea what was going on and who the aggressor was. Are you following so far?

They walked up, identified themselves and Garner immediately told them to get lost and he resisted their attempt to find out what was happening. To your point, he had not committed a crime but a crime was being committed and they were trying to figure out what happened.

The minute he resisted their investigation, it spiraled out of control.

Do you understand?

 

[Enfuego]

Considering you originally said a store owner called the cops on him and they were responding to him, how can I take you serious?

I dont give a flying fuck about some fight. He wasn’t involved in the fight and they weren’t called to attend to him. Which means the stop they made on him was illegal.


I keep asking you what he did wrong and all you tell me is he had 30+ arrests lmfao. So what law did he break? Being black?

Again, read the article.

Many shopowners had called to complain. Hundreds of complaints.

On that day, they were responding to a fight in progress. He would not cooperate with the fight investigation. They didn’t know if he was involved or not.

This is very elementary stuff.

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Again, for the 100th time, let me go real slow.

When the cops saw a fight on the sidewalk, they had no idea what was going on and who the aggressor was. Are you following so far?

They walked up, identified themselves and Garner immediately told them to get lost and he resisted their attempt to find out what was happening. To your point, he had not committed a crime but a crime was being committed and they were trying to figure out what happened.

The minute he resisted their investigation, it spiraled out of control.

Do you understand?

Lmfaooooo stop. I don’t give a fuck.

its a simple question


WHAT CRIME DID GARNER COMMIT???????? DO YOU KNOW?!?!?!?

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Again, read the article.

Many shopowners had called to complain. Hundreds of complaints.

On that day, they were responding to a fight in progress. He would not cooperate with the fight investigation. They didn’t know if he was involved or not.

This is very elementary stuff.

So he didnt commit a crime for them to approach him. Thank you. Enough said. It was an illegal stop.. when he told them to kick rocks and leave.... they should have followed the law and left him alone. But they’re blue isis and they don’t do that. Thank ya

 

[Pulledclear]

He was a model citizen. Emphasis on WAS.

Bump.^<<^

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

You can stop someone suspicious. But he doesn’t have to answer questions or provide identification. Doesn’t have to comply if he doesn’t want to because he did nothing wrong. He doesn’t talk to their kind. Because of how they will try to violate your rights and lock you up. Unfortunately, he was dealing with some hot shot tyrants who lost their job due to their behavior.

Protect and serve. Public servants. Remember that. People have rights, moron.

 

[Pulledclear]

You can stop someone suspicious. But he doesn’t have to answer questions or provide identification. Doesn’t have to comply if he doesn’t want to because he did nothing wrong. He doesn’t talk to their kind. Because of how they will try to violate your rights and lock you up. Unfortunately, he was dealing with some hot shot tyrants who lost their job due to their behavior

Yep. And they were dealing with a typical non compliant rabid boon with no regard for the law. Guess who won?cheersgif

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Yep. And they were dealing with a typical non compliant rabid boon with no regard for the law. Guess who won?cheersgif

Since the clown lost his job and people will remember garners name for far longer than the tyrant cop....I have to say Garner won. Especially for fighting when he knew he did nothing wrong. Good man right there. Can’t say the same for the racist tyrant cop though

 

[Enfuego]

So he didnt commit a crime for them to approach him. Thank you. Enough said. It was an illegal stop.. when he told them to kick rocks and leave.... they should have followed the law and left him alone. But they’re blue isis and they don’t do that. Thank ya

He was fucking standing in the middle of a fight. They didn’t know if he was involved or not. Again, why is this so hard to understand?

 

[Pulledclear]

Since the clown lost his job and people will remember garners name for far longer than the tyrant cop....I have to say Garner won. Especially for fighting when he knew he did nothing wrong. Good man right there. Can’t say the same for the racist tyrant cop though

Way to think it through Nut Dumpster. You're a real deep thinker. Well done!

 

[azbob]

A) You didn’t read the damn story. The cops were responding to a fight in progress.

B) You don’t know and neither do I what NY state law or department policy is regarding takedown maneuvers.

Do your homework.

Turning in my assignment...anything else you need to know?


New York State Assembly
BILL NUMBER:

A10170

​

SPONSOR:

Rules (Mosley)


​

TITLE OF BILL

: An act to amend the penal law, in relation to estab-
lishing the crime of strangulation in the first degree; disregard of
banned employment procedures


​

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL

:

Establishes penalties for the use of a chokehold.


​

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS

:

Section 1. Amends the penal law, section 121.11. Provides that a person
who uses any procedure known as a chokehold shall be guilty of criminal
obstruction of breathing or blood circulation.
​

JUSTIFICATION

:

In 1993, the New York City Police Department completely banned its offi-

cers from using a procedure commonly referred to as a "chokehold."
According to the NY Daily News: "Members of the NYPD will NOT use choke-
holds," the NYPD patrol guide clearly states. "A chokehold shall
include, but is not limited to, any pressure to the throat or windpipe
which may prevent or hinder breathing to reduce intakes of air" (NYPD
patrol guide clearly states members cannot use chokeholds; New York
Daily News Barry Paddock, Thomas Tracy; Friday, July 18, 2014).
​

 

[Enfuego]

Turning in my assignment...anything else you need to know?


New York State Assembly
BILL NUMBER:

A10170

​

SPONSOR:

Rules (Mosley)


​

TITLE OF BILL

: An act to amend the penal law, in relation to estab-
lishing the crime of strangulation in the first degree; disregard of
banned employment procedures


​

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL

:

Establishes penalties for the use of a chokehold.


​

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS

:

Section 1. Amends the penal law, section 121.11. Provides that a person
who uses any procedure known as a chokehold shall be guilty of criminal
obstruction of breathing or blood circulation.
​

JUSTIFICATION

:

In 1993, the New York City Police Department completely banned its offi-

cers from using a procedure commonly referred to as a "chokehold."
According to the NY Daily News: "Members of the NYPD will NOT use choke-
holds," the NYPD patrol guide clearly states. "A chokehold shall
include, but is not limited to, any pressure to the throat or windpipe
which may prevent or hinder breathing to reduce intakes of air" (NYPD
patrol guide clearly states members cannot use chokeholds; New York
Daily News Barry Paddock, Thomas Tracy; Friday, July 18, 2014).
​

Then he should be fired and perhaps charged with a crime. Did you finally read about what actually happened instead of just guessing?

 

[LargeMarge]

He was fucking standing in the middle of a fight. They didn’t know if he was involved or not. Again, why is this so hard to understand?

Standing in the middle of a fight? He was breaking up the fight, as bystanders had told the cops. Do you realize a video exists of the event? You could tell the cop was making up shit when Garner asked him who he saw selling loosies to.
Yes he committed crimes in the past. But what he did that day did not deserve him to be gang tackled and put into a chokehold
Also, one of the officers on scene says “it had nothing to do with a fight, it had to do with something else”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OWoZ4Mj9028

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Standing in the middle of a fight? He was breaking up the fight, as bystanders had told the cops. Do you realize a video exists of the event? You could tell the cop was making up shit when Garner asked him who he saw selling loosies to.
Yes he committed crimes in the past. But what he did that day did not deserve him to be gang tackled and put into a chokehold
Also, one of the officers on scene says “it had nothing to do with a fight, it had to do with something else”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OWoZ4Mj9028

Lmfao whoopsy.


Enflameos narrative just went to shit. This is when he will start quoting his timeline of events again lmfaooooo. Leaving out all of the shit in between the lines. Like the fact Garner tried to break up the fight and the cops still illegally stop him.

I knew the facts. But telling Enflameo the facts doesn’t work. He needs proper audio and visualization. What a disgrace this guy Enflameo. Why even argue your narrative?


Enflameo- “ What do you not understand. They were fighting!!!!! And the cops showed up.”


The guy doesn’t understand he is proving my point for me. If they showed up because other people were fighting, then it had nothing to do with Garner committing any crimes. Which means it was an illegal detainment. Learn your rights Enflameo

 

[LargeMarge]

[FONT=&quot]D'Amico also claimed he could see Garner selling the cigarettes from an estimated distance of 200 feet. But a prosecutor with the Civilian Complaint Review Board said he was 328 feet away, [/FONT]reports the New York Daily News[FONT=&quot].[/FONT]

 

[LargeMarge]

[FONT=&quot]Garner was suspected of selling loose, untaxed cigarettes. D'Amico testified he filled out arrest papers after Garner died that included a felony tax charge that he was selling 10,000 untaxed cigarettes.
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]D'Amico acknowledged it was not the correct charge. D'Amico said Garner had fewer than 100 cigarettes on him when police tried to arrest him.
[/FONT]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/daniel...-charges-against-eric-garner-after-his-death/

 

[LargeMarge]

Shorty situation all around. 100% the cops fault as evidenced by the massive settlement. Anyone defending them is a moron

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

He was fucking standing in the middle of a fight. They didn’t know if he was involved or not. Again, why is this so hard to understand?

Because it is NOT a crime to break up a fight or stand near a fight. Not a crime. Keep reaching though.


I’m learning more and more about this case and it’s getting more and more ridiculous honestly. No store owner called that day. Which you tried to act like it went down.... no report was made about Garner that day before the incident. The call they got had nothing to do with Garner.

Pretty fucking clear what their objective was. Arrest garner for the 35th time or whatever