Now THAT was a Stupid play By Seattle

[SunDodger]

The Hawks got a break form the refs cuz they owed 'em one for the late call against in the Green Bay game.

Wilson throws a pick, then the guy fumbles and a Hawk player comes up with it. The refs say no, Green Bay ball. Game over.

It happened to Seattle last year at St. Louis, late in the game. A receiver fumbles, Richard Sherman comes out of the pile with the ball. The refs say no, St. Louis ball. Game over.

The rule is bullshit, and needs to go away.



Lastly, quit acting like the game was over if Detroit scored a TD there. The Hawks had two timeouts and there was still over a minute and a half left to play.

 

[VIEJODINOSAUR]

Second year in a row that the refs gave Seattle a win....very disturbing.....

Even Pete Carroll said that they got away with one after the Detroit game...

 

[Enfuego]

Second year in a row that the refs gave Seattle a win....very disturbing.....

Even Pete Carroll said that they got away with one after the Detroit game...

Two things:

A) If Detroit scores, Seattle has 1:30 left with two timeouts so the outcome of the game was still in doubt.

B) What happened last year for Seattle to get a win by the refs?

 

[VIEJODINOSAUR]

A.....Detroit up by 4.....Seattle needs a TD

B.....GIft win Hail Mary play against GB....

 

[Enfuego]

A.....Detroit up by 4.....Seattle needs a TD

B.....GIft win Hail Mary play against GB....

Fail Mary took place R. Wilson's rookie year. This is his 4th year in the league.

The game was not over if C. Johnson scores there. 1:30 left with two time outs is a ton of time in the NFL and Wilson has a lot of game winning drives.