A Pathetic shameful LIAR. Sees NO DIFFERENCE in the 2 sentences. This is what sane people of decency have to deal with.
Ace: The fact of the matter there are zero gun control success stories in America. None.
Ace:There are no examples of gun control success stories, that is successes only attributed to gun control, in America. None.
A Pathetic, Shameful LIAR does what it does. Continue to willfully, shamefully LIE.
Ace: The fact of the matter there are zero gun control success stories in America. None.
Ace:There are no examples of gun control success stories, that is successes only attributed to gun control, in America. None.
There is not any differences in the sentences.
And the fact that you are trying to claim there is, shows how pathetic (and ignorant on the topic) you are.
Me: "there are no examples of gun control success stories in America"
Idiot: "Yuh-huh, here is one where there are strict gun control and it is an Island 2,000+ miles from the continental US"
Me: "Uh, which part of the low violent crime rate is attributed to the geography and which part is attributed to the laws?"
Idiot: "ZOMFG!!!!!11111 Wingnutty, I don't answer questions like that!!! GOALPOSTS! liar!!!!"
In summary, there are exactly zero examples of gun control success stories in America.
None.
So far there isn’t any proof the White House was involved in the IRS scandal.
But it’s worked it’s way up to DOJ.
Emails Show Lois Lerner Planned to Help DOJ Prosecute Conservative Groups.
The mountain of evidence that Lois Lerner engaged in criminal activity just grew even bigger today. Emails from early 2013 show that Lerner gladly assisted the Department of Justice with plans to prosecute conservative groups--and only conservative groups--for “lying” about political activity.
The email text shows these cases would be a stretch, and everyone knew it. Lerner said herself that criminal prosecutions of these groups would not fit well with the law.
More…
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...ned-to-Help-DOJ-Prosecute-Conservative-Groups
But it’s worked it’s way up to DOJ.
Emails Show Lois Lerner Planned to Help DOJ Prosecute Conservative Groups.
The mountain of evidence that Lois Lerner engaged in criminal activity just grew even bigger today. Emails from early 2013 show that Lerner gladly assisted the Department of Justice with plans to prosecute conservative groups--and only conservative groups--for “lying” about political activity.
The email text shows these cases would be a stretch, and everyone knew it. Lerner said herself that criminal prosecutions of these groups would not fit well with the law.
More…
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...ned-to-Help-DOJ-Prosecute-Conservative-Groups
House Votes 231-187 to Hold Lois Lerner in Contempt
http://www.mediaite.com/online/house-votes-231-187-to-hold-lois-lerner-in-contempt/
:aktion033
http://www.mediaite.com/online/house-votes-231-187-to-hold-lois-lerner-in-contempt/
:aktion033
Lois Lerner, Democrat, should be facing criminal prosecution.
Once the full chamber has certified the contempt citation, a report is prepared and presented to the U.S. Attorney. The U.S.A. then has a duty to present the contempt citation and report to a grand jury in order to get an indictment for contempt of Congress. See 2 U.S.C. § 194.
Once the full chamber has certified the contempt citation, a report is prepared and presented to the U.S. Attorney. The U.S.A. then has a duty to present the contempt citation and report to a grand jury in order to get an indictment for contempt of Congress. See 2 U.S.C. § 194.
Sorry Ace. Since when has Holder upheld his duty to enforce all the laws. He picks and chooses.
The justice department under this administration is pretty much a joke.
Cruz released a document on May 7 titled "The Legal Limit Report No. 4: The Obama Administration's Abuse of Power," which lists 76 of President Obama's "lawless" actions.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...-Lawless-Actions-By-Obama-In-Bombshell-Report
If his boss doesn’t bother to uphold his duty to obey the law what makes anyone think Holder will?
There is a law dating back to the 1800’s that allows the House to arrest Lerner and actually confine her in the Capital jail but what are the odds of that happening? I’m thinking slim to none.
[h=1]Progressive Bloggers Are Doing the White House's Job[/h]
http://www.nationaljournal.com/maga...gers-are-doing-the-white-house-s-job-20140509
http://www.nationaljournal.com/maga...gers-are-doing-the-white-house-s-job-20140509
I don’t want to tell anyone I told you so but I told you so.
Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner refused to consider using the House’s constitutional authority to arrest disgraced IRS official Lois Lerner for being in contempt of Congress, noting it’s never been used before and should be left to Attorney General Eric Holder.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/11/b...rrest-lois-lerner-for-contempt/#ixzz31XCxEXW2
Amoeba man strikes again.
John 'Crybaby' Boehner may be one of the main reasons that the Corrutpocrats still have both the Senate and White House.
His refusal to expose the corruption, lies and criminality is beyond retching.
The radical left figured out how to win a long time ago: you don't have to fool the people, you just have to fool the lamestream media.
It's the "loyal opposition's" job to ensure that doesn't happen.
What a disgrace!
His refusal to expose the corruption, lies and criminality is beyond retching.
The radical left figured out how to win a long time ago: you don't have to fool the people, you just have to fool the lamestream media.
It's the "loyal opposition's" job to ensure that doesn't happen.
What a disgrace!
New Judicial Watch emails reveal Washington DC office directed targeting of Tea Party groups
Posted on May 14, 2014 at 3:30 PM in Politics | 1 Comment
By The Right Scoop
Judicial Watch has obtained more emails as it relates to the targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status by the IRS. These emails reveal that the EOT (Exempt Organization Technical unit) in Washington DC directed the targeting of Tea Party groups and was coordinating between their Cincinnati office and their LA office:
The emails also reveal that Democrat Senator Carl Levin was also putting immense pressure on the IRS to target and shut down conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status:
Posted on May 14, 2014 at 3:30 PM in Politics | 1 Comment
By The Right Scoop
Judicial Watch has obtained more emails as it relates to the targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status by the IRS. These emails reveal that the EOT (Exempt Organization Technical unit) in Washington DC directed the targeting of Tea Party groups and was coordinating between their Cincinnati office and their LA office:
One key email string from July 2012 confirms that IRS Tea Party scrutiny was directed from Washington, DC. On July 6, 2010, Holly Paz (the former Director of the IRS Rulings and Agreements Division and current Manager of Exempt Organizations Guidance) asks IRS lawyer Steven Grodnitzky “to let Cindy and Sharon know how we have been handling Tea Party applications in the last few months.” Cindy Thomas is the former director of the IRS Exempt Organizations office in Cincinnati and Sharon Camarillo was a Senior Manager in their Los Angeles office. Grodnitzky, a top lawyer in the Exempt Organization Technical unit (EOT) in Washington, DC, responds:
EOT is working the Tea party applications in coordination with Cincy. We are developing a few applications here in DC and providing copies of our development letters with the agent to use as examples in the development of their cases. Chip Hull [another lawyer in IRS headquarters] is working these cases in EOT and working with the agent in Cincy, so any communication should include him as well. Because the Tea party applications are the subject of an SCR [Sensitive Case Report], we cannot resolve any of the cases without coordinating with Rob.
The reference to Rob is believed to be Rob Choi, then-Director of Rulings and Agreements in IRS’s Washington, DC, headquarters.
EOT is working the Tea party applications in coordination with Cincy. We are developing a few applications here in DC and providing copies of our development letters with the agent to use as examples in the development of their cases. Chip Hull [another lawyer in IRS headquarters] is working these cases in EOT and working with the agent in Cincy, so any communication should include him as well. Because the Tea party applications are the subject of an SCR [Sensitive Case Report], we cannot resolve any of the cases without coordinating with Rob.
The reference to Rob is believed to be Rob Choi, then-Director of Rulings and Agreements in IRS’s Washington, DC, headquarters.
The emails also reveal that Democrat Senator Carl Levin was also putting immense pressure on the IRS to target and shut down conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status:
A series of letters between Senator Levin (D-MI), chairman of the Subcommittee on Investigations, and top IRS officials throughout 2012 discuss how to target conservative groups the senator claimed were “engaged in political activities.” In response to a Levin March 30 letter citing the “urgency of the issue,” then-Deputy Commissioner Steven Miller assured the senator that IRS regulations were flexible enough to allow IRS agents to “prepare individualized questions and requests” for select 501(c)(4) organizations.
The newly released IRS documents contain several letters and emails revealing an intense effort by Levin and IRS officials to determine what, if any, existing IRS policies could be used to revoke the nonprofit exemptions of active conservative groups and deny exemptions to new applicants. In a July 30, 2012, letter, Levin singles out 12 groups he wants investigated for “political activity.” Of the groups – which include the Club for Growth, Americans for Tax Reform, the 60 Plus Association, and the Susan B. Anthony List – only one, Priorities USA, is notably left-leaning.
As the 2012 presidential election drew nearer, Levin sent a series of letters to the IRS intensifying his campaign against predominantly conservative nonprofit groups:
I encourage you to read the full writeup from Judicial Watch. It contains all relevant links to emails that back up their claims.The newly released IRS documents contain several letters and emails revealing an intense effort by Levin and IRS officials to determine what, if any, existing IRS policies could be used to revoke the nonprofit exemptions of active conservative groups and deny exemptions to new applicants. In a July 30, 2012, letter, Levin singles out 12 groups he wants investigated for “political activity.” Of the groups – which include the Club for Growth, Americans for Tax Reform, the 60 Plus Association, and the Susan B. Anthony List – only one, Priorities USA, is notably left-leaning.
As the 2012 presidential election drew nearer, Levin sent a series of letters to the IRS intensifying his campaign against predominantly conservative nonprofit groups:
- September 27, 2012: Levin asks for copies of the answers to IRS exemption application question 15 – a question about planned political expenditures – from four specific groups: Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, Priorities USA, Americans for Prosperity, and Patriot Majority USA.
- October 17, 2012: Miller informs Levin, “As discussed in our previous responses dated June 4, 2012, and August 24, 2012, the IRS cannot legally disclose whether the organizations on your list have applied for tax exemptions unless and until such application is approved.” Miller, however, then informs Levin that Americans for Prosperity and Patriot Majority have been approved, but the IRS has no records for Crossroads and Priorities USA.
- October 23, 2012: Levin writes to again express his dissatisfaction with the IRS handling of “social welfare” (501(c)(4) organizations insisting that IRS guidance “misinterprets the law” by allowing any political activity. He again demands an answer as to whether the four organizations he listed in his previous letter were primarily engaged in the promotion of social welfare. He also seeks copies of tax exempt revocation letters sent due to c4 political activities, as well as statistics on how many c4s have been notified that they may be in violation due to political activities.
The idea that "rogue agents in Ohio" had anything to do with this is a laughable lie.
[h=1]IRS's tea-party noose tightens: Targeting campaign was directed by HQ in Washington, D.C. – not by a few 'rogue agents' in Ohio, documents reveal[/h]
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ed-headquarters-Washington.html#ixzz31n1Q6xJv
Note: there isn't a single leftist in this forum who cares. Not 1.
[h=1]IRS's tea-party noose tightens: Targeting campaign was directed by HQ in Washington, D.C. – not by a few 'rogue agents' in Ohio, documents reveal[/h]
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ed-headquarters-Washington.html#ixzz31n1Q6xJv
Note: there isn't a single leftist in this forum who cares. Not 1.
