There are several. I've posted 2. But being the liar and spinner you are, you will not accept any statistics that show Hawaii having the lowest gun death rate, and is one of the strictest gun control states as being meaningful. You will dwell on other reasons. And of course, that has NOTHING to do with your original lie.
There are several. I've posted 2. But being the liar and spinner you are, you will not accept any statistics that show Hawaii having the lowest gun death rate, and is one of the strictest gun control states as being meaningful. You will dwell on other reasons. And of course, that has NOTHING to do with your original lie.
Hahaha, notice the sentence has to be truncated to get you where you need to be. "nd, as an island in the middle of the pacific ocean, it is perhaps the hardest state to transport out-of-state weapons to."
Hilarious.
Now we need to truncate sentences to "prove" me wrong.
I'm sure it is just a coincidence.
Wrong.
You posted 2 articles, and I never disputed the figures. In fact, I've made at least 5 posts saying Hawaii has a relatively low violent crime rate.
However, what you would need to do in order to show this is a gun control success story is to show that the demographics and geography have nothing to do with those rates.
Gun control means REGULATING Guns, including who can and can't get guns, how much of a check there is, how much of a waiting period there is, etc. Hawaii has done a great job of that. But AGAIN, that has NOTHING to do with your Original statement. It is hysterical to watch you spin, lie, deny there was any original statement that I was responding to. You are an absolute pathetic clown.
The sentence is there for all to see. Only the part I emphasized has anything to do with your original statement. Hawaii's geography has NOTHING to do with your original statement, except that it is part of America, thereby showing your original statement was false, and it's proudly the birthplace of our current President.
Watching you be wholly unable to respond to a fact you cited is hilarious.
I am not "moving goalposts" at all.
You simply can not provide any evidence of gun control being a success without including "and, as an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean"
That is a you problem.
Your inability to address this show what a pathetically dishonest person you are.
Uh, the fact that you quite literally can not understand that my statement has not at all changed is hilarious.
You, not me, introduced Hawaii "an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean" into the discussion.
You've now laughably asserted I am "moving the goalposts" by responding to a fact included in your reference.
The only reason for this is you are actually so stupid you can't understand I am not moving any goal posts, or you're dishonest.
No you didn't, idiot.
You provided the example of Hawaii, an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.
There are no examples of gun control success stories, that is successes only attributed to gun control, in America. None.
And the fact that you would pathetically pretend that Hawaii's geography, in fact you introduced Hawaii's geography trying to pretend it wasn't attributed to Hawaii's relatively low violent crime rate, plus gun laws is an example of a gun control success story, shows what a silly little goal post mover you are.
I'll pick up the mic for this. Notice the difference in these 2 statements, the original one by ace, and now the modified one. Yet the liar claims he doesn't move the goalposts. Pathetic lie by a pathetic, serial liar.
Ace: The fact of the matter there are zero gun control success stories in America. None.
Ace:There are no examples of gun control success stories, that is successes only attributed to gun control, in America. None.
The fact you actually are trying to say that there are 2 different statements, or any "modified" one is laugh out loud funny and indicative of your low IQ.
The fact that you can not understand, or are dishonestly trying to pretend not to, that "There are no examples of gun control success stories in America" would actually mean an example of gun control, not an example of gun control + geography, shows how pathetic you are.
Yes idiot, gun control sits in the sentence alone.
Gun Control alone
Moron.
There are exactly zero gun control success stories in America. None. And you're a rank idiot for pretending that gun control + geography refutes that claim.
And, the fact that you would pathetically pretend that Hawaii's geography, in fact you introduced Hawaii's geography trying to pretend it wasn't attributed to Hawaii's relatively low violent crime rate, plus gun laws is an example of a gun control success story, shows what a silly little goal post mover you are.
So as we see, yet again, shouts of "moving the goal posts" are projection.
