Newsletters

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
996
Tokens
In the last few years, when Pointwise and The Gold Sheet were in agreement, they did very well.
This year I have them: 1-5 first 6. Since then, they're on an 11-6 run. 12-11 this bowl year. The last two qualifiers are Ohio and ULaf.
Like most other trends, they die expensively.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,768
Tokens
PointWise & Gold Sheet Agreements
12/20 – Buffalo (W)
12/21 – Fl International (L), Boise St (L), App State (L)
12/23 – Marshall (L)
12/24 – BYU (L)
12/26 – LA Tech (W), Eastern Michigan (W)
12/27 – Wake Forest (L), Air Force (W)
12/28 – Memphis (L), Clemson (W)
12/30 – L’ville (W), Cal (W), Florida (L)
12/31 – KY (W), Navy (W), Wyoming (W), Texas (W)
1/1 – Alabama (W), Auburn (L), Oregon (W)
Jan 2 – Cincy (W)
Jan 3 – Ohio
Jan 6 - ULL

14-9 and will end up profitable (again).
 

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
5,497
Tokens
Gold Sheet on a roll

iniana , ohio and today S miss to lose by only 1 is covering
 

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
996
Tokens
PointWise & Gold Sheet Agreements
12/20 – Buffalo (W)
12/21 – Fl International (L), Boise St (L), App State (L)
12/23 – Marshall (L)
12/24 – BYU (L)
12/26 – LA Tech (W), Eastern Michigan (W)
12/27 – Wake Forest (L), Air Force (W)
12/28 – Memphis (L), Clemson (W)
12/30 – L’ville (W), Cal (W), Florida (L)
12/31 – KY (W), Navy (W), Wyoming (W), Texas (W)
1/1 – Alabama (W), Auburn (L), Oregon (W)
Jan 2 – Cincy (W)
Jan 3 – Ohio
Jan 6 - ULL

14-9 and will end up profitable (again).
Calif was not the pick. GSheet and PW picked Cal by by 1 and 2 as a 6 or 7 point favorite. Therefore, Illinois was the pick and lost (by 15).
Wyoming/Geo St: GSheet said Wyoming by 3, PWise said Wyoming by 11.
The line was Wyoming by 7.
They were NOT in agreement, so this game was not a pick.
 

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
5,341
Tokens
OH-OH. Looks like I shut down another thread. Sorry.

Hey guys. Looks like an awesome thread. I am just wondering, is this thread gone or will Buzz Kill continue to post the newsletters?

Just saw this thread yesterday so I hope this thread is still going to be up.

Thanks
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
207
Tokens
Hey guys. Looks like an awesome thread. I am just wondering, is this thread gone or will Buzz Kill continue to post the newsletters?

Just saw this thread yesterday so I hope this thread is still going to be up.

Thanks

I can not speak for Buzz, cuz he's the bomb when it comes to this thread, but the football newsletters are usually received Tues-Thurs, iit's now mostly basketball season and those newsletters (Winning Points, Playbook, Pointwise, Goldsheet) will have their basketball newsletters out usually 2 times a week, not always and they are always a great read and you can view them complimentary if you are patient and have some type of minimal techy in ya, LOL.

Best of luck to you and be sure to appreciate those who post the newsletters in here, they are not cheap!
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
207
Tokens
Hey guys. Looks like an awesome thread. I am just wondering, is this thread gone or will Buzz Kill continue to post the newsletters?

Just saw this thread yesterday so I hope this thread is still going to be up.

Thanks
Football newsletters are all updated through yesterday and I'm sure Buzz would tell ya, and hoops newsletters like Pointwise, Playbook, GoldSheet and Winning Points are just starting to be more consistent so bear with him and this site!!

Later!!
 

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
5,341
Tokens
Football newsletters are all updated through yesterday and I'm sure Buzz would tell ya, and hoops newsletters like Pointwise, Playbook, GoldSheet and Winning Points are just starting to be more consistent so bear with him and this site!!

Later!!

Sorry I should have said what times do the newsletters come out instead of being impatient.

Thats all i needed to know
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,768
Tokens
2019-2020 Bowl tracking ATS

Lawrence Bowl Stat Report: 19-20 (1-2 BB) (*first time in 3 years he has had a losing bowl season)
PointWise: 21-18
Gold Sheet: 18-21
Power Sweep: 19-19 (4* 6-2)
Powers’ Picks: 21-18
Sports Reporter: 18-21 (3-2 BB)



I went back and reviewed the agreement games. I did make an error and these are the records.

Sports Reporter & Powers agreements: 9-7
Power Sweep & Lawrence agreement games 9-8
PointWise & Gold Sheet Agreements 12-12
 

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
213
Tokens
Pointwise, Gold Sheet, Sports Reporter, Winning Points.
These newsletters all have premium services.
Does anybody have a read on how good these are?
 

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
5,341
Tokens
Pointwise, Gold Sheet, Sports Reporter, Winning Points.
These newsletters all have premium services.
Does anybody have a read on how good these are?

That is why I was asking. Need to see current issues.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
868
Tokens
Pointwise, Gold Sheet, Sports Reporter, Winning Points.
These newsletters all have premium services.
Does anybody have a read on how good these are?

Seemingly, these come to print too early. They don't take into account many game-time variables. Some may have their runs, but I feel they lack consistency over time. With that said, I feel that if someone is disciplined enough to subscribe to the philosophy of one specific service, there is potential to make a slight return on one's initial investment. Overall, they are best used as a guide. Additionally, they do provide some missing pieces, but I would use them as a supplement to your picks rather than an end-all.

The geniuses behind them are the real winners. While their picks do matter, I'd guess it would equate to more subscribers, win or lose, they still make money off the initial sale. With this, they generate a steady income to wager how they please. That's where the real money is consistently made, through newsletters and picks.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
868
Tokens
If they release premium service offerings late, such as PointWise Phones, for example, (I think they release closer to game-time), they'd probably prove most accurate.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,669
Tokens
Seemingly, these come to print too early. They don't take into account many game-time variables. Some may have their runs, but I feel they lack consistency over time. With that said, I feel that if someone is disciplined enough to subscribe to the philosophy of one specific service, there is potential to make a slight return on one's initial investment. Overall, they are best used as a guide. Additionally, they do provide some missing pieces, but I would use them as a supplement to your picks rather than an end-all.

The geniuses behind them are the real winners. While their picks do matter, I'd guess it would equate to more subscribers, win or lose, they still make money off the initial sale. With this, they generate a steady income to wager how they please. That's where the real money is consistently made, through newsletters and picks.

Stfu
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,886
Messages
13,560,877
Members
100,700
Latest member
877cashnow!
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com