Newsletter Tracking Through October 7
Mendoza Line Newsletter Tracking (through 10/7/2018)
Not every newsletter gets posted every week, and I'll try to note when the record doesn't include every week of the season.
Another note is that the grading is based on the line indicated in the newsletter at the time of publication, not the closing line. Many of these newsletters will claim a win against the best available line as it moves throughout the week, but these records reflect the outcome against the line they were willing to make a play on in their newsletter.
CKO (Hate to drop this one, but we haven't gotten it for a couple weeks.)
11* (0-3)
10* (5-6)
Totals (1-2)
Gridiron Gold Sheet
NCAA Best Bets (19-12)
NFL Best Bets (10-10)
Marc Lawrence Playbook NCAA
5* (3-3)
4* (1-5)
3* (4-1-1)
Upset pick (2-4)
Betcha Didn't Know (2-12)
Awesome Angle (3-3)
Incredible Stat (2-3-1)
Marc Lawrence Playbook NFL (3-0 this week)
5* (4-1)
4* (3-2)
3* (3-2)
Pointwise NCAA (6-2 overall this week)
1* (4-6-1)
2* (2-5)
3* (2-4)
4* (6-5-1)
5* (5-7)
Pointwise NFL (0-4-0 so far this week)
3* (2-3)
4* (3-5-1) (Washington +6.5 pending for Monday night)
5* (2-8)
PowerSweep NCAA (8-1 overall in college picks this week)
4* (5-1)
3* (6-5)
2* (6-5-1)
Underdog Play of the Week (3-3)
Tech Play of the Week (2-1-1)
Revenge Play of the Week (1-5)
Situational Play of the Week (3-1)
Series Play of the Week (3-1)
PowerSweep NFL
4* (2-3)
3* (3-1-1)
2* (1-3-1)
NFL System play (3-4)
4* Pro Angle (0-1)
Powers Picks NCAA
3* (7-4)
2* (10-9)
1* (0-0)
Powers Picks NFL
4* (0-0)
3* (2-2)
2* (10-0)
1* (0-0)
Sports Reporter
NCAA Super Best Bets (2-0)
NCAA Best Bets (7-12)
NFL Super Best Bets (0-0)
NFL Best Bets (5-5)
Red Sheet
89* (6-6)
88* (8-15-1)
Winning Points
NCAA 4* (5-1)
NCAA 3* (2-4)
NFL 4* (4-1)
NFL 3* (3-2)
Killer Sports, not including teasers
MTI 5* (0-1)
MTI 4.5* (3-2)
MTI 4* (2-2)
MTI 3* (0-0)
SBB 4.5* (1-2)
SBB 4* (4-2-1)
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet
3* (1-3) (Over 51 pending for Monday night)
2* (5-5)
PowerPlays
NCAA 4.5* (12-5)
NCAA 4* (12-13)
NFL 4* (3-1-1)
Gold Sheet
NCAA Key Releases (10-13)
NFL Key Releases (6-8-1)
Mendoza Line Newsletter Tracking (through 10/7/2018)
Not every newsletter gets posted every week, and I'll try to note when the record doesn't include every week of the season.
Another note is that the grading is based on the line indicated in the newsletter at the time of publication, not the closing line. Many of these newsletters will claim a win against the best available line as it moves throughout the week, but these records reflect the outcome against the line they were willing to make a play on in their newsletter.
CKO (Hate to drop this one, but we haven't gotten it for a couple weeks.)
11* (0-3)
10* (5-6)
Totals (1-2)
Gridiron Gold Sheet
NCAA Best Bets (19-12)
NFL Best Bets (10-10)
Marc Lawrence Playbook NCAA
5* (3-3)
4* (1-5)
3* (4-1-1)
Upset pick (2-4)
Betcha Didn't Know (2-12)
Awesome Angle (3-3)
Incredible Stat (2-3-1)
Marc Lawrence Playbook NFL (3-0 this week)
5* (4-1)
4* (3-2)
3* (3-2)
Pointwise NCAA (6-2 overall this week)
1* (4-6-1)
2* (2-5)
3* (2-4)
4* (6-5-1)
5* (5-7)
Pointwise NFL (0-4-0 so far this week)
3* (2-3)
4* (3-5-1) (Washington +6.5 pending for Monday night)
5* (2-8)
PowerSweep NCAA (8-1 overall in college picks this week)
4* (5-1)
3* (6-5)
2* (6-5-1)
Underdog Play of the Week (3-3)
Tech Play of the Week (2-1-1)
Revenge Play of the Week (1-5)
Situational Play of the Week (3-1)
Series Play of the Week (3-1)
PowerSweep NFL
4* (2-3)
3* (3-1-1)
2* (1-3-1)
NFL System play (3-4)
4* Pro Angle (0-1)
Powers Picks NCAA
3* (7-4)
2* (10-9)
1* (0-0)
Powers Picks NFL
4* (0-0)
3* (2-2)
2* (10-0)
1* (0-0)
Sports Reporter
NCAA Super Best Bets (2-0)
NCAA Best Bets (7-12)
NFL Super Best Bets (0-0)
NFL Best Bets (5-5)
Red Sheet
89* (6-6)
88* (8-15-1)
Winning Points
NCAA 4* (5-1)
NCAA 3* (2-4)
NFL 4* (4-1)
NFL 3* (3-2)
Killer Sports, not including teasers
MTI 5* (0-1)
MTI 4.5* (3-2)
MTI 4* (2-2)
MTI 3* (0-0)
SBB 4.5* (1-2)
SBB 4* (4-2-1)
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet
3* (1-3) (Over 51 pending for Monday night)
2* (5-5)
PowerPlays
NCAA 4.5* (12-5)
NCAA 4* (12-13)
NFL 4* (3-1-1)
Gold Sheet
NCAA Key Releases (10-13)
NFL Key Releases (6-8-1)
Tk for the tallies
Well yes but original post was posted on Sunday 10-7 which was after week 4. We have to turn in 5 plays per week which are due by Saturday morning at 11:00 Pacific. So what juicemaker did was took top teams AFTER week 4 which would be 20 selections 17-3 and then put the 5 plays for week 5 of all above 80%. Which would make his plays for week 5 PATRIOTS,RAVENS,STEELERS,LIONS,CARDINALS for 4-1not a losing record and different plays than listed
Explanation of the spreadsheet. Since I can cut and paste the spreadsheet I'll try to recreate it here.
avg total avgto spread spr vs avg diff
FAU 28 17 24 30 31 31 20 26 76 -6 13.5 18 -5
UCF 43 41 45 42 49 41 48 44
A) First 7 numbers to the right of the teams are their predictions from different newsletters and websites.
B) Under average is the average score of the newsletters.
C) Under total, is the Over/under for the game at hand, and also the number I have at the time of posting the sheet. ( I'm not tracking closing lines, barely have time to do this honestly)
D) Under avg-total all i'm doing is taking the total of the numbers under AVG, which in this case equals 70 and subtracting the TOTAL line. 70-76= -6. ANYTHING that comes up with a differential of 5 or more, I'm marking it yellow as a play to track. Why 5? No reason. That's what I chose. It seemed like a decent # at the time to not have a ton of plays. So in this situation, the play would be under 76. Game ended up going over, so it's marked RED as a loser
E) Lets move to the spreads. Under spread, it says 13.5 . If you look where the spread is, it's on the FAU line. It'll always be on the away team line of the sheet. FAU was +13.5
F) Let's look at the spread vs avg line. Underneath of it says 18. All this is doing is taking the average for UCF points scored which was 44 and subtracting it from the 26 points FAU was averaged to score. 44-26= 18 which is what is under the spread vs avg.
H) The last column DIFF is taking the spread 13.5 and subtracting what the newsletters say FAU will lose by which was 18. My spreadsheet rounds up so this has the difference being 5. This would make UCF a play ATS at 13.5 since the newsletters have them winning by 18. UCF covered that spread so the cell is highlighted in green for being a winner.
Hope that helps. Not sure I'll be able to get this done this week. Heading to Chicago Friday for my first visit and then off to the Notre Dame game the next day. Will try to get it done Thursday if I can. If not I'll fill in the spreadsheet when I get home to keep up with tracking purposes.
avg total avgto spread spr vs avg diff
FAU 28 17 24 30 31 31 20 26 76 -6 13.5 18 -5
UCF 43 41 45 42 49 41 48 44
A) First 7 numbers to the right of the teams are their predictions from different newsletters and websites.
B) Under average is the average score of the newsletters.
C) Under total, is the Over/under for the game at hand, and also the number I have at the time of posting the sheet. ( I'm not tracking closing lines, barely have time to do this honestly)
D) Under avg-total all i'm doing is taking the total of the numbers under AVG, which in this case equals 70 and subtracting the TOTAL line. 70-76= -6. ANYTHING that comes up with a differential of 5 or more, I'm marking it yellow as a play to track. Why 5? No reason. That's what I chose. It seemed like a decent # at the time to not have a ton of plays. So in this situation, the play would be under 76. Game ended up going over, so it's marked RED as a loser
E) Lets move to the spreads. Under spread, it says 13.5 . If you look where the spread is, it's on the FAU line. It'll always be on the away team line of the sheet. FAU was +13.5
F) Let's look at the spread vs avg line. Underneath of it says 18. All this is doing is taking the average for UCF points scored which was 44 and subtracting it from the 26 points FAU was averaged to score. 44-26= 18 which is what is under the spread vs avg.
H) The last column DIFF is taking the spread 13.5 and subtracting what the newsletters say FAU will lose by which was 18. My spreadsheet rounds up so this has the difference being 5. This would make UCF a play ATS at 13.5 since the newsletters have them winning by 18. UCF covered that spread so the cell is highlighted in green for being a winner.
Hope that helps. Not sure I'll be able to get this done this week. Heading to Chicago Friday for my first visit and then off to the Notre Dame game the next day. Will try to get it done Thursday if I can. If not I'll fill in the spreadsheet when I get home to keep up with tracking purposes.
Trying to recreate the spreadsheet on here didn't work out lol. The below will be under the sample tab.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zsOu2wbFSWaAvwauUnVy4hzpFSVN5Wnsacab5WArHx4/edit?usp=sharing
A) First 7 numbers to the right of the teams are their predictions from different newsletters and websites.
B) Under average is the average score of the newsletters.
C) Under total, is the Over/under for the game at hand, and also the number I have at the time of posting the sheet. ( I'm not tracking closing lines, barely have time to do this honestly)
D) Under avg-total all i'm doing is taking the total of the numbers under AVG, which in this case equals 70 and subtracting the TOTAL line. 70-76= -6. ANYTHING that comes up with a differential of 5 or more, I'm marking it yellow as a play to track. Why 5? No reason. That's what I chose. It seemed like a decent # at the time to not have a ton of plays. So in this situation, the play would be under 76. Game ended up going over, so it's marked RED as a loser
E) Lets move to the spreads. Under spread, it says 13.5 . If you look where the spread is, it's on the FAU line. It'll always be on the away team line of the sheet. FAU was +13.5
F) Let's look at the spread vs avg line. Underneath of it says 18. All this is doing is taking the average for UCF points scored which was 44 and subtracting it from the 26 points FAU was averaged to score. 44-26= 18 which is what is under the spread vs avg.
H) The last column DIFF is taking the spread 13.5 and subtracting what the newsletters say FAU will lose by which was 18. My spreadsheet rounds up so this has the difference being 5. This would make UCF a play ATS at 13.5 since the newsletters have them winning by 18. UCF covered that spread so the cell is highlighted in green for being a winner.
Hope that helps. Not sure I'll be able to get this done this week. Heading to Chicago Friday for my first visit and then off to the Notre Dame game the next day. Will try to get it done Thursday if I can. If not I'll fill in the spreadsheet when I get home to keep up with tracking purposes.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zsOu2wbFSWaAvwauUnVy4hzpFSVN5Wnsacab5WArHx4/edit?usp=sharing
A) First 7 numbers to the right of the teams are their predictions from different newsletters and websites.
B) Under average is the average score of the newsletters.
C) Under total, is the Over/under for the game at hand, and also the number I have at the time of posting the sheet. ( I'm not tracking closing lines, barely have time to do this honestly)
D) Under avg-total all i'm doing is taking the total of the numbers under AVG, which in this case equals 70 and subtracting the TOTAL line. 70-76= -6. ANYTHING that comes up with a differential of 5 or more, I'm marking it yellow as a play to track. Why 5? No reason. That's what I chose. It seemed like a decent # at the time to not have a ton of plays. So in this situation, the play would be under 76. Game ended up going over, so it's marked RED as a loser
E) Lets move to the spreads. Under spread, it says 13.5 . If you look where the spread is, it's on the FAU line. It'll always be on the away team line of the sheet. FAU was +13.5
F) Let's look at the spread vs avg line. Underneath of it says 18. All this is doing is taking the average for UCF points scored which was 44 and subtracting it from the 26 points FAU was averaged to score. 44-26= 18 which is what is under the spread vs avg.
H) The last column DIFF is taking the spread 13.5 and subtracting what the newsletters say FAU will lose by which was 18. My spreadsheet rounds up so this has the difference being 5. This would make UCF a play ATS at 13.5 since the newsletters have them winning by 18. UCF covered that spread so the cell is highlighted in green for being a winner.
Hope that helps. Not sure I'll be able to get this done this week. Heading to Chicago Friday for my first visit and then off to the Notre Dame game the next day. Will try to get it done Thursday if I can. If not I'll fill in the spreadsheet when I get home to keep up with tracking purposes.
Kindergartencapper,
What day of the week do you typically post your new spreadsheet, for that current week ?? Also, I was asking around but got no feedback...... BY ANY CHANCE DO YOU HAVE AN NFL SPREADSHEET ? Only asking due to the time and the detail you put into this, was curious if the NFL has ever been tested to see its results, NOT TO MENTION THE ANOUNT OF TIME YOU COULD FREE YOURSELF UP FROM.
From what I’ve seen so far in CFB, it really seems like you got something really solid to use as a strong handicapping tool. Unfortunately, I’ve jumped on the wagon a bit late and haven’t had the chance to put down some nice cash on your “biggest, movers & shackers.” LMFAO !
*** WELL, BEST OF LUCK TO YOU THE REST OF THE SEASON AND HOPE YOU CAN FIND SOME TIME TO DO THIS WEEKS CFB BOARD, I’M QUITE SURE THIS IS EXTREMELY TIME CONSUMING.
What day of the week do you typically post your new spreadsheet, for that current week ?? Also, I was asking around but got no feedback...... BY ANY CHANCE DO YOU HAVE AN NFL SPREADSHEET ? Only asking due to the time and the detail you put into this, was curious if the NFL has ever been tested to see its results, NOT TO MENTION THE ANOUNT OF TIME YOU COULD FREE YOURSELF UP FROM.
From what I’ve seen so far in CFB, it really seems like you got something really solid to use as a strong handicapping tool. Unfortunately, I’ve jumped on the wagon a bit late and haven’t had the chance to put down some nice cash on your “biggest, movers & shackers.” LMFAO !
*** WELL, BEST OF LUCK TO YOU THE REST OF THE SEASON AND HOPE YOU CAN FIND SOME TIME TO DO THIS WEEKS CFB BOARD, I’M QUITE SURE THIS IS EXTREMELY TIME CONSUMING.
Rx Newsletter Play of the Week Record is 2-3
Rx Newsletter Play of the Week
Winner winner, chicken dinner! After the Monday night OVER win we are going with the Oakland Raiders Seattle Seahawks OVER 48 for this weeks play. I continue this week with Victor King's top newsletter play, a 3 star, from the current issue of the Totals Tipsheet. If you bet this, bet it early as possible!
The top OVER UNDER newsletter pick (3 star) is now 23-13 over the last three years or 64% on these picks.
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet - 2018 Record
3* (2-3)
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet - 2017 Record
3* (8-5)
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet - 2016 Record
3* (13-5)
Rx Newsletter Play of the Week
Winner winner, chicken dinner! After the Monday night OVER win we are going with the Oakland Raiders Seattle Seahawks OVER 48 for this weeks play. I continue this week with Victor King's top newsletter play, a 3 star, from the current issue of the Totals Tipsheet. If you bet this, bet it early as possible!
The top OVER UNDER newsletter pick (3 star) is now 23-13 over the last three years or 64% on these picks.
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet - 2018 Record
3* (2-3)
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet - 2017 Record
3* (8-5)
Victor Kings's Totals Tipsheet - 2016 Record
3* (13-5)
