Wrong. I never knew it was a problem. Because I never knew stats from other leagues were included until now. Something that happened 50 years ago must have slipped through the cracks of my awareness.
If you would do a better job with your reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, you would have picked up on that.
Here some history of baseball stats, as far as I can tell. If I am wrong in any of this, someone can correct me. In 1968, The Baseball Encyclopedia decided to include some leagues other than MLB in their published records. First edition then came out in 1969. Many of us were not alive then. But none of us ever voiced any issues or problems with it.
In 1989, some people had disagreements with the accuracy of The Baseball Encyclopedia and made Total Baseball. This book also contained stats from several leagues along side MLB stats. Those of us who were alive then never expressed any problem with it.
In the 1990s mlb.com put statistical records online, mostly just copying from those other places. They included stats from leagues other than MLB. This information has been easily available to all of us for 25 years and none of us said anything about it
Baseball-reference started in the early 2000s and has since become the most recognized compilation of baseball stats, following the same practice that the others did. We were alive then, many of us were even betting on sports online. None of us ever questioned this decision. As we looked around and studied the history of the sport and the statistical records, none of us questioned the inclusion of these leagues other than MLB.
Now this week, in 2020, some people have decided to become emotional about the fact that mlb.com and baseball-reference has Benny Kauff listed with a .370 batting average in 1914. It is fascinating and a little hilarious how something like that can suddenly be so upsetting to all the retarded Liberals.