My Final Post

Search

New member
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
590
Tokens
While I enjoyed reading that post, Tim (very well said), it was WAY too clean for the RR.

You're better than that (or worse than that, since this is the RR).

Shit piss **** fuck cocksucker motherfucker tits.

RIP George Carlin.
 

Is that a banana in your mouth or . . .
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
1,897
Tokens
You're giving me Jman + odds?

The only way he doesn't cash is if his muzzle is kept on with the racial slurs.

These are odds on the 2009 contest. BOOKIE and realestatepro are out in front arent they. Jman has all but soldified the not yet finished 2008 contest. Therefore; he has done and cannot possibly do anything to warrant him being the favorite for 2009 until after the 2008 contest is over. correct me if I am wrong.
 

Is that a banana in your mouth or . . .
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
1,897
Tokens
I'd say with his track record and what he's done in the past month alone, how could you not peg him as the odds on favorite to defend his title?

fair enough. I guess Tiger is the favorite at the 2010, 2011, 2012, etc. Masters even though he has not yet played the 2009 Masters
 

Last night I drank enough to kill a small Asian fa
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
6,839
Tokens
Bingo. You can't take over the throne in one week. Getting to the Jman/PO69 level takes months, nay years to achieve. Look at the stuff we've drawn from that's dated from what, 3, 4 years ago. All about building a portfolio, a body of work. Bookie and realestatepro haven't done that yet.

Wait until bookie catches his wife masturbating with a Ghandi inspired vibrator.

Hell hath no fury
 

For G-Baby
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
18,919
Tokens
Fester and I have enormously differing opinions on myriad political issues

There are a lot of well-educated posters at this site, but I'd venture to guess that you are one of maybe 5-10 who actually knew that it's "myriad political issues," and not "myriad of political issues."

I'm impressed.

Now change that avatar so I don't continue to associate you with OldManTed, for the love of god.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Sep 20, 2003
Messages
17,238
Tokens
I hope that Bookie puts his Rx handle up on ebay so I can bid on it and continue to stoke the fires of the rubber room.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
Bookie should tell his story to Shrink. Probably get a free dinner and become a new "valued poster" of the EOG community.
 

PBR

Time for your Pabst test ladies
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
5,716
Tokens
There are a lot of well-educated posters at this site, but I'd venture to guess that you are one of maybe 5-10 who actually knew that it's "myriad political issues," and not "myriad of political issues."

I'm impressed.

Now change that avatar so I don't continue to associate you with OldManTed, for the love of god.

Wait a minute, it's not "myriad of"? WTF? What's so special about "myriad"? I mean if you say "bevy" or "plethora" or "multitude" or "abundance", they all can accept an "of" following them. Nay, they NEED an "of" following them. But not this special hoity-toity word "myriad", huh? Well FUCK "myriad".
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
944
Tokens
Since I sort of got this ball rolling (by proposing an IQ test for rolls), I feel obligated to comment. Also, I can't help myself.

REP, you made a remark that we were all certainly betting out of a $100 roll, yet when someone offers a challenge in which you allegedly have a huge edge, you can't put up 10K? Ummm... believe it or not, this forum has some big-leaguers. It might not be a good idea to demean our bankrolls if you can't put up 10K on such a juicy proposition.

Secondly, you offer betting posting privileges as an alternative. This is moronic on many different levels. First, FZ is a respected poster that is valued on the forum, whereas you are the current laughingstock of the forum. Hardly seems fair, eh? Second, what would stop the losing poster from creating another handle and continuing to post. Third, no one actually believes that if you lost you would accept the judge's opinion and go quietly into the night. You'd rant and rave and tell us how ignorant we are. Fourth, how is posting equal in value to 10K??? He's obviously not scared, and I'm assuming you'd take the socialism side, so he has a huge advantage topic-wise. He is simply looking to maximize value for his efforts.

Third, and this is my biggest concern, is you're broad generalization of posters (in this case FZ). Fester and I have enormously differing opinions on myriad political issues, but I know that he has the good of common people at heart, and I greatly respect him. Further, I have read a lot of his posts, and it is apparent that he is highly educated. But you claim to "know" that you have him intellectually outclassed.. This doesn't make sense. What if Stephen Hawking is posting on therx forum under the handle "FesteringZit?" Do you still win the IQ test? To take a bet like this seems to be wildly -EV, which leads me to question your gambling judgment in the first place. To advocate such a test so vehemently, you must have an IQ 4 or 5 standard deviations above the average person's. But this clearly isn't the case, as your elementary dialogue and ad hominem attacks clearly indicate.

I think you'll find that many members of this forum are much smarter than you give them credit for. I would certainly take an IQ bet for a reasonable amount of money with you if 1) there was a reliable testing method readily available to both of us (there isn't) and 2) I trusted you (I don't). So that's all I've got. Good luck with your plays this year, and congratulations on the happy home life you've established.

To first address your comment about my bankroll. I don't have the largest bankroll but not the smallest either. I'm not rich by any means but I do OK. Before having a child to care for and saving up to buy a house (I'm plannig on putting about 30% or more down on one) I would bet as much as $500 on a game. Now, this year, I'll probably make $100 my top bet. As for 10k, I wouldn't wager that on anything. Especailly on something that could be rigged. He says we could get local posters to monitor but what if that poster is his friend? They wouldn't lie?

On to the fact that "most of this board" believes I wouldn't pay anyway. I guess a few losers that sit in the RR don't think that, but I'd say most of this board is smart enough to not make those assumptions. Fact is that I've never gone back on a bet before in my life. From small friendly bets to larger bets.

As for Zit being a well respected poster, I don't see it. I don't respect right wing conservatives. People that actually think places like Walmart make the economy better because they charge lower prices.

Last thing I'll touch on is the fact that you read FZ say that he's a schoolar so that means he's a genius. He wouldn't even debate me. He's too afraid and that's a fact. His time is too valuable but he's on here anyway.
 

PBR

Time for your Pabst test ladies
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
5,716
Tokens
Don't you mess with my Walmart, you pinko commie lib.
 

Anybody seen BB?
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
3,489
Tokens
Don't you mess with my Walmart, you pinko commie lib.
federline+shane.jpg
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
To first address your comment about my bankroll. I don't have the largest bankroll but not the smallest either. I'm not rich by any means but I do OK. Before having a child to care for and saving up to buy a house (I'm plannig on putting about 30% or more down on one) I would bet as much as $500 on a game. Now, this year, I'll probably make $100 my top bet. As for 10k, I wouldn't wager that on anything. Especailly on something that could be rigged. He says we could get local posters to monitor but what if that poster is his friend? They wouldn't lie?

On to the fact that "most of this board" believes I wouldn't pay anyway. I guess a few losers that sit in the RR don't think that, but I'd say most of this board is smart enough to not make those assumptions. Fact is that I've never gone back on a bet before in my life. From small friendly bets to larger bets.

As for Zit being a well respected poster, I don't see it. I don't respect right wing conservatives. People that actually think places like Walmart make the economy better because they charge lower prices.

Last thing I'll touch on is the fact that you read FZ say that he's a schoolar so that means he's a genius. He wouldn't even debate me. He's too afraid and that's a fact. His time is too valuable but he's on here anyway.

Do you know WVU?:think2:
 

For G-Baby
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
18,919
Tokens
No, it's different because he said the assumptions he make are LOGICAL. So that makes it OK.

Question for realestatepro: if Mother Teresa was a right-wing conservative, would you not respect her?

Actually, another question: how come you're not a loser for spending hours upon hours in this thread as well as the Rx in general, but we are? You assume that we have no life, and you think you've above us even though you're doing the exact same thing? lol.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,001
Tokens
There are a lot of well-educated posters at this site, but I'd venture to guess that you are one of maybe 5-10 who actually knew that it's "myriad political issues," and not "myriad of political issues."

I'm impressed.

Now change that avatar so I don't continue to associate you with OldManTed, for the love of god.


FYI:

Usage Note: Throughout most of its history in English myriad was used as a noun, as in a myriad of men. In the 19th century it began to be used in poetry as an adjective, as in myriad men. Both usages in English are acceptable, as in Samuel Taylor Coleridge's "Myriad myriads of lives." This poetic, adjectival use became so well entrenched generally that many people came to consider it as the only correct use. In fact, both uses in English are parallel with those of the original ancient Greek. The Greek word mūrias, from which myriad derives, could be used as either a noun or an adjective, but the noun mūrias was used in general prose and in mathematics while the adjective mūrias was used only in poetry.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/myriad
 

New member
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
590
Tokens
There are a lot of well-educated posters at this site, but I'd venture to guess that you are one of maybe 5-10 who actually knew that it's "myriad political issues," and not "myriad of political issues."

I'm impressed.

Now change that avatar so I don't continue to associate you with OldManTed, for the love of god.

TY sir. Any suggestions for the new avatar? Oh, and go fuck yourself (that's for you Dsethi).
 

For G-Baby
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
18,919
Tokens
F u, festeringZit. = (

timotinbowen, I dunno...how bout this:
 

Attachments

  • slover5.jpg
    slover5.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 82
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
944
Tokens
Hold on, so the rest of the board is smart enough not to make assumptions about you, but all you've done in this thread and others is make assumptions about other posters? So wouldn't that mean that the rest of the board is smarter than you?

Oh, I get it now.

OK, let me break this down for you. An educated assumption is based on things that you see. I saw someone making childish remarks and getting angry at a person on an internet forum when nobody was talking to them. The actions made me come to conclusions. An assumption that I would not pay a bet would be made on what info? As soon as you have an answer for this let me know.
 

Hey Let Me Hold Some Ends I'll Hit You Back On The
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
1,232
Tokens
To first address your comment about my bankroll. I don't have the largest bankroll but not the smallest either. I'm not rich by any means but I do OK. Before having a child to care for and saving up to buy a house (I'm plannig on putting about 30% or more down on one) I would bet as much as $500 on a game. Now, this year, I'll probably make $100 my top bet. As for 10k, I wouldn't wager that on anything. Especailly on something that could be rigged. He says we could get local posters to monitor but what if that poster is his friend? They wouldn't lie?

On to the fact that "most of this board" believes I wouldn't pay anyway. I guess a few losers that sit in the RR don't think that, but I'd say most of this board is smart enough to not make those assumptions. Fact is that I've never gone back on a bet before in my life. From small friendly bets to larger bets.

As for Zit being a well respected poster, I don't see it. I don't respect right wing conservatives. People that actually think places like Walmart make the economy better because they charge lower prices.

Last thing I'll touch on is the fact that you read FZ say that he's a schoolar so that means he's a genius. He wouldn't even debate me. He's too afraid and that's a fact. His time is too valuable but he's on here anyway.

me mucho estupido......

Realestatepro that doesn't own his own house :ohno:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,994
Messages
13,576,016
Members
100,890
Latest member
diepduy014.vmex
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com