BTW Fezzick, here is a question.
Sea was 9 over +120 a couple weeks ago at Oly. Did you take them at that number? Now they are 9 over -185 and under +155. That is a 75 cent freebie thatthe won;t win exactly nine games.
So another question. Why not max bet on the over 8.5, then bet the under 9? Especially if you can find an over 8.5 (-170)that is lower than a 9 (-185). That is a simultaneous side. And since you are seemingly loading up on this "bad" number, you are getting a free shot at a winning number of 9.
Plus if they are a bust, as they have been the last few years you have a saver at nice odds.
You could take it even further than that and take them at Pin for a simultaneous 34 cent scalp. Even with a $1000 limit at Pin that is still a free 140 or 111 at 1000 on the under versus 1900 on the over. Or since you like the over, you lay 1000 on the under for about 115, and 1925 on the over @ -170 for 135. That is if you can get that much down on the over where they are -170.
Sea was 9 over +120 a couple weeks ago at Oly. Did you take them at that number? Now they are 9 over -185 and under +155. That is a 75 cent freebie thatthe won;t win exactly nine games.
So another question. Why not max bet on the over 8.5, then bet the under 9? Especially if you can find an over 8.5 (-170)that is lower than a 9 (-185). That is a simultaneous side. And since you are seemingly loading up on this "bad" number, you are getting a free shot at a winning number of 9.
Plus if they are a bust, as they have been the last few years you have a saver at nice odds.
You could take it even further than that and take them at Pin for a simultaneous 34 cent scalp. Even with a $1000 limit at Pin that is still a free 140 or 111 at 1000 on the under versus 1900 on the over. Or since you like the over, you lay 1000 on the under for about 115, and 1925 on the over @ -170 for 135. That is if you can get that much down on the over where they are -170.