more scientists caught manipulating data to prove global warming

[festeringZit]

 

[festeringZit]

Let's look at the facts of Willie's comments. Must sucked to be owned by a man festeringZit. Got to have no character or integrity to defend a racist and falsely accuse someone of being a pedophile. That's just sick and twisted stuff. But what do you expect from someone who names them self "festeringZit". Gotta have mental issues.


The working class was 88% in 1980 - False
The working class was 72% in 2012 - False
Romney won the working class vote by 20 points - False
Reagan won the working class vote by 20 points - False
Romney won the tax payer vote 60/40 - False

So we already have established that these statements are completely false that Willie has made. Now... if you replace working class and tax payer with "white vote"... all those statements are true.

So either Willie is incredibly dumb or he's just a racist making racist comments insinuating that white people are the working/tax paying members of society and the non-white people aren't.

I honestly cannot believe you claim to be a man of character and this is your excuses for Willie making obviously blatant racist comments. Not a single one of the 3 items you listed is remotely true. And you and Willie know it, you just can't admit it because Willie would bitch slap you for going against the cult.

You're just not very bright douche-bag.

Even if we assume that the data you provide is true, well then my option #2 fits in perfectly.

2. It's not true, but Willie thinks it's true

idiot.

 

[festeringZit]

 

[festeringZit]

 

[festeringZit]

 

[festeringZit]

 

[akphidelt]

You're just not very bright douche-bag.

Even if we assume that the data you provide is true, well then my option #2 fits in perfectly.

2. It's not true, but Willie thinks it's true

idiot.

So Willie thinks all those white voting numbers are actually the working class numbers? I agree. That's why he's a racist, lmao!! You have to have more integrity than that, lol. Can't believe how deep Willie's balls are shoved down your throat.

 

[festeringZit]

 

[festeringZit]

 

[akphidelt]

Look at poor chubby little festeringZit all by himself, lmao!!! This is exactly how intelligent people view the global warming argument.

 

[festeringZit]

 

[akphidelt]

Found a recent picture of festeringZit... he's the dude behind the guy in the red, who I imagine is Willie. Always got to cover his ass, lmao!!!

 

[pubguy]

You're just cherry picking random shit. It's not even a real scientific argument which is why 99% of actual research points to global warming. Not even a discussion amongst intelligent people these days.

It's a scientific paper in PNAS no less, which states that California's climate change over the last hundred years can be explained entirely by natural causes. Not cherry picked at all. Just the latest hot off the presses scientific research.

The global average temperatur has warmed since the end of the Little Ice Age. Surely we can stipulate that in a reasonable discussion? The scientific fact is that the Sun + PDO + AMO explains greater than 95% of the climate change over the last 400 years.

http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/08/its-sun_9.html

 

[ScottL]

@Climate2014Live

If you wanna keep up with all the methane gases full of empty commitments emanating from the UN Summit

 

[akphidelt]

It's a scientific paper in PNAS no less, which states that California's climate change over the last hundred years can be explained entirely by natural causes. Not cherry picked at all. Just the latest hot off the presses scientific research.

The global average temperatur has warmed since the end of the Little Ice Age. Surely we can stipulate that in a reasonable discussion? The scientific fact is that the Sun + PDO + AMO explains greater than 95% of the climate change over the last 400 years.

http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/08/its-sun_9.html

There is no mention of that explaining greater than 95% of climate change by Staalgard. That reference is nothing more than another blogger that is manipulating data to show what they want. No peer reviewed research, no acceptance by the scientific community. Just like your last post about another guy who said there was a diminishing returns on CO2. When all he did was fallaciously try to correlate atmospheric temperatures with increases to CO2. His conclusion would have been completely different if he used global means temperature instead.

 

[pubguy]

You failed to address the peer reviewed paper re: California

You misunderstood that I made a statement about the diminishing returns of additional CO2, a fact that is scientifically well established and not controversial.

 

[akphidelt]

You failed to address the peer reviewed paper re: California

You misunderstood that I made a statement about the diminishing returns of additional CO2, a fact that is scientifically well established and not controversial.

CO2 might have diminishing returns but your article you sourced used this to try to explain why atmospheric temperature has started to increase less. This is fallacious. Ocean temperatures are growing at a very high rate and there is not even close to accepted research that we've reached any point where more CO2 will not cause more heating.

 

[scottcarter]

just checking in is all. I assumed that this surely would all be resolved by now. Some kind of mutual understanding must have occurred. Guess not.

 

[akphidelt]

just checking in is all. I assumed that this surely would all be resolved by now. Some kind of mutual understanding must have occurred. Guess not.

Well, it's resolved in the academic community. Still an ongoing discussion in the blogosphere and forums.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Well, it's resolved in the academic community. Still an ongoing discussion in the blogosphere and forums.

academia :Carcajada: