I need to find the graphic, but a researcher actually did a deep dive tracking every photo from the Apollo "moon landings". What he found was even though NASA claimed the missions were getting longer, the number of photos kept shrinking. Weird, right? You would think the opposite.
The reason is obvious. They were running out of material since everything was filmed in a movie studio in one shot by Kubrick under LBJ.
That's one of the reasons NASA stopped going to the moon - they ran out of photos.
Another interesting observation is not enough time on the moon to have taken the volume of pics in the NASA archive. Not to mention, no way of testing these cameras under the harshest temperatures.. Nothing remotely close on Earth.
There are so many ways to debunk this hoax.
Money laundering, that's all it is.
The reason is obvious. They were running out of material since everything was filmed in a movie studio in one shot by Kubrick under LBJ.
That's one of the reasons NASA stopped going to the moon - they ran out of photos.
Another interesting observation is not enough time on the moon to have taken the volume of pics in the NASA archive. Not to mention, no way of testing these cameras under the harshest temperatures.. Nothing remotely close on Earth.
There are so many ways to debunk this hoax.
Money laundering, that's all it is.