Inside the Pylons.
sds has a scheme a methodology, inside information, and lots of race watching experience that he is comfortable with. This leads him to posting many many live horses. Horses that run better than their running lines might suggest. Obviously that does not mean great value every time. That $2.10 to win horse the other day was not great value! He is not be the best person prior to a race to predict the final odds of a given horse at post time. We can all see that. Well so what? Use your own judgment if you think a horse that was selected by sds offers your criteria for value then play it in your style of choice. The selections he gives offer many many live horses that often get the trip, or have a driver go for position and a winning move. He watches these drivers and horses every day. He is right in some way a horse that he thinks might be 5-1 (but he loves to win based on his knowledge) might in fact be even more likely to win and more of a value if other inside information drives him down to 7-5. He might win that type of race 70% of the time on his "5-1" choice that is bet down. He has done that for a month now. if you have been watching closely.
Dont preach to a guy about his level or style of selections and for sure dont preach about the way a guy should put down his wagers. IF he wants to start exploring value concepts at some point Im sure he will post some questions to that effect and maybe get some discussions going. If it is not broke it dont try to Fix it!
sds has a scheme a methodology, inside information, and lots of race watching experience that he is comfortable with. This leads him to posting many many live horses. Horses that run better than their running lines might suggest. Obviously that does not mean great value every time. That $2.10 to win horse the other day was not great value! He is not be the best person prior to a race to predict the final odds of a given horse at post time. We can all see that. Well so what? Use your own judgment if you think a horse that was selected by sds offers your criteria for value then play it in your style of choice. The selections he gives offer many many live horses that often get the trip, or have a driver go for position and a winning move. He watches these drivers and horses every day. He is right in some way a horse that he thinks might be 5-1 (but he loves to win based on his knowledge) might in fact be even more likely to win and more of a value if other inside information drives him down to 7-5. He might win that type of race 70% of the time on his "5-1" choice that is bet down. He has done that for a month now. if you have been watching closely.
Dont preach to a guy about his level or style of selections and for sure dont preach about the way a guy should put down his wagers. IF he wants to start exploring value concepts at some point Im sure he will post some questions to that effect and maybe get some discussions going. If it is not broke it dont try to Fix it!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>The flipside of course is UNTIL you show me that you know what you are talking about ,then you are merely another poster who talks the talk. Please do not misconstrue the meaning. I am simply tired of all the guys who blast a board with their "abilities" only to have someone else post their REAL record in the given sport lol Also, What I meant by saying that you need to WIN, is that in order
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Let me post my record for Wed. 9/24...... Minus $22,400 USD
That is my "REAL" record for today. Are you going to challenge that? You win the competition. I am merely another poster who talks the talk.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Let me post my record for Wed. 9/24...... Minus $22,400 USD
That is my "REAL" record for today. Are you going to challenge that? You win the competition. I am merely another poster who talks the talk.
"REAL" ???
That would be opposed to "Fake" ???
Unless you are just playing games here, I am confused. I hope that you are above board with this conversation - as do all the others I would assume. I would also like to say that I am not trying to be a smartass either.
IF you are down that much money ,then what exactly are you offering up? Maybe what you are stating is that if I could pull horses better then you but you could create value better than I, then we would BOTH do better?
Is THAT where you were going? Because when I was saying that you must WIN in order to add value to me, I was simply stating that if you are not having success, then I won't trade my successes (big or small( for failures - that is all I meant by that last post INSIDE.
Fill me in brother.
sds
That would be opposed to "Fake" ???
Unless you are just playing games here, I am confused. I hope that you are above board with this conversation - as do all the others I would assume. I would also like to say that I am not trying to be a smartass either.
IF you are down that much money ,then what exactly are you offering up? Maybe what you are stating is that if I could pull horses better then you but you could create value better than I, then we would BOTH do better?
Is THAT where you were going? Because when I was saying that you must WIN in order to add value to me, I was simply stating that if you are not having success, then I won't trade my successes (big or small( for failures - that is all I meant by that last post INSIDE.
Fill me in brother.
sds
