Why all the hostility. Have you ever been to college where the whole point of a project wasn't the end result but how you tackled a problem and tried to find a solution?
If you have ever gone to a good university or college like MIT, you would understand that this could very well be a serious project.
In fact, on NPR last year they did an interview with a group of students that made a computer program that was supposed to pick the NCAAB playoff results as part of their class. The program was aweful, but it was the experience and the way that they handled building a solution to a problem that counted...
Which wouldn't necessarily mean picking winners. Instead, the student would receive a grade not necessarily on the winning % but the thought that went into the model. What tipped me off that this isn't real is that these guys need winners for their grade. This wouldn't be the case at an institution like MIT.
when I said this it wasnt like they would get an A or B depending on how the system works but that maybe the more successful it was the better the grade...listen you have the right to ur opinions...this is a forum; but from the beginning I wanted this kept private because the friend of mine didnt think I would be posting these on a gambling forum...which is bad of me i admit but for you to actually try and contact the school or whatever is really low
17-23 is not the end of the world. -830 roughly. If your bankroll can't stomach that than you aint a gambler. BOL on the rest of the season. I haven't followed or faded but I'm a believer in systems based on stats so I've been watching the thread. BTW, a guy in my AP Chem class filled out his MIT application DURING CLASS (less than 45 min) and WRITTEN IN PENCIL. He got in. They are certainly an eccentric bunch.
this whole thread is one big lie. I have been gambling long enough to know that there is absolutely no program that can be created that would spit out even 50% winners constantly. You might as well get a chicken and feed it from two bowls..Select the marked for the bowl from which the chicken eats from and you will do as well as this bogus MIT nonsense.
Matter of fact there is no MIT wiz even stupid enough to waste their time trying to make such a nonsensical programme.
The best you could ever do is do a stats compiler that can in no way predict out comes of games.
I cant believe this liar has the gall to sell people on bullshit like this programme can actually calculate game out comes while factoring in weather..
yeah right...
But hey, a sucker is born every minute, keep posting this bogus nonsense and you will surely hook enough idiots that know absolutely nothing about computing, stats or even sports betting for that matter..
DR Crotch
Matter of fact there is no MIT wiz even stupid enough to waste their time trying to make such a nonsensical programme.
The best you could ever do is do a stats compiler that can in no way predict out comes of games.
I cant believe this liar has the gall to sell people on bullshit like this programme can actually calculate game out comes while factoring in weather..
yeah right...
But hey, a sucker is born every minute, keep posting this bogus nonsense and you will surely hook enough idiots that know absolutely nothing about computing, stats or even sports betting for that matter..
DR Crotch
hno:What happened to a civil toned discussion on this week's selections?
Good luck with your plays, but are you really taking Miami (OH) +29 over Cincinnati to spite the good Doctor? :think2: That may be hazardous to your health. Cincy looks like a legit squad capable of laying a woodshed beatdown on those stooges. Miami(OH)? @)
What happened to a civil toned discussion on this week's selections?
Good luck with your plays, but are you really taking Miami (OH) +29 over Cincinnati to spite the good Doctor? :think2: That may be hazardous to your health. Cincy looks like a legit squad capable of laying a woodshed beatdown on those stooges. Miami(OH)? @)
the mit crew didnt take miami ohio
