Mark McCloskey, St. Louis man charged after pointing gun at crowd outside home, slams prosecutor

[MAGAking1]

Why do you keep questioning a still that shows obvious lock damage, why does the whole video matter
But here it is for your consumption
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/l...sters/63-14a1582a-9372-4494-b8ee-41d5d4d71b61

What is your contention other than there was a guy holding a gate with a heavily damaged lock through which
people trespassed.

Here is another video as well that not many have seen.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/multi...deo_549aab77-78a8-550e-9474-8b1a25660e4d.html

 

[KennyB]

The Marxists on this board blame the McCloskeys for protecting their property from the mob. Frankly these Marxists are part of the big problem in this country. They apologize for criminal activity and attack law abiding citizens. Let's not forget that the McCloskeys vote Democrat and support BLM.

 

[Enfuego]

Am I scared? Sure.

Do I get a gun? Nope.
Do I point a gun at people? Nope.
Do I lie about protesters breaking the gate? Nope.

They didn't point a gun and the protesters did break the gate.

Did we watch the same news coverage?

 

[Cheddar]

I don't know how much of the thread you have read, but there could have been confusion over whether or not this was a private road. I have shared my experience with Google taking me down private roads at times and posted experiences of others. It's not uncommon.

You can usually drive a car on a "road". A car wouldn't fit through that gate. Now you are just trolling for reaction

 

[Serbone]

The lightweight troll is engaged in deflecting the issue, focused on the stupid gate, and Ngo doxxing. Then he calls me out on spelling (I am on iPhone and on the run) like a TYPICAL weasel Democrat, namecalling and personal attacks, do not address the true issues.

The issue is 300-500 violent rioters threatening a couple's family and home with violence, the rioters had guns, yelled threats, 30 feet from their door, and the rioters have a documented recent and nearby history of extreme violence.

It was broken in to, it was private property, bu fuok the stupid gate issue!

 

[rush__man]

Why do you keep questioning a still that shows obvious lock damage, why does the whole video matter
But here it is for your consumption
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/l...sters/63-14a1582a-9372-4494-b8ee-41d5d4d71b61

What is your contention other than there was a guy holding a gate with a heavily damaged lock through which
people trespassed.

Here is another video as well that not many have seen.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/multi...deo_549aab77-78a8-550e-9474-8b1a25660e4d.html

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury I once again ask - looking at the configuration of the lock... what possible way could the gate be opened without a key? The gate clearly shows no other possible entrance method.

Again... my contention is not with the gate damage but with how the gate doors were breached in the first place.

 

[rwjr]

Haha, what's my game? You were proven wrong in this thread, and now you are mad at me for it. Interesting.

Wrong about what ? , your the 1 whose making an :bigone: outta yourself :hahahahah

 

[rwjr]

I looked up BRAIN DEAD in the dictionary & it said ..... hinesward86 :hahahahah

 

[MAGAking1]

The Marxists on this board blame the McCloskeys for protecting their property from the mob. Frankly these Marxists are part of the big problem in this country. They apologize for criminal activity and attack law abiding citizens. Let's not forget that the McCloskeys vote Democrat and support BLM.

You are already seeing this divide amongst "normal" dems:neenee:

and this harder left group that want to tear shit down:hammerit

 

[rwjr]

You are already seeing this divide amongst "normal" dems:neenee:

and this harder left group that want to tear shit down:hammerit

:hahahahah

 

[HinesWard86]

What falsehoods you taking about. That Lewis didnt attend inauguration, that he didnt accuse Trump of Russian collusion, that he didnt accuse people of racial slurs yet no video evidence exists.

Listen you keep doing your job as lying lib trying to divide the country and Ill do mine by calling you out for your hypocrisy

Way to move the goalposts. Pretty clear that you got caught posting disingenuous info and are now trying to cover it up. Here's a reminder:

I am hyper critical of media that is truth adverse. Breitbart writes with such a slant that it obfuscates the truth. Take the article that was quoted earlier.

He falsely accused the Tea Party of shouting the “N-word” during a protest against Obamacare in March 2020 - This is a dubious claim at best. Lewis and three other people said it happened, Breitbart said it didn't happen ostensibly because it wasn't on tape. Additionally, this incident happened in 2010 not 2020. Poor editing. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tea-par...ideo-evidence/

Once, he falsely accused Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) of not participating in the civil rights movement. - This is inaccurate. John Lewis' quote was "I never saw him. I never met him", in regards to Bernie Sanders and his involvement in the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Since Lewis was such a prominent figure during that time, it was a jab at how much Bernie was involved, but it was not an abject denial of any involvement.

Lewis also falsely accused President Trump of supporting white supremacists, saying that he cried when Trump said there were “good people on both sides” of protests in Charlottesville, Virginia. (Trump actually condemned the white supremacists “totally.") - There's lots to unpack here. However, what is most interesting is that if you click on the first hyperlink this is the quote they are using to justify that claim:

I don’t think this president has been helpful. I think he feels at home with what is going on. When he reacted to what was happening in Charlottesville, you know, “Good people on both sides,” I cried. It’s not the America that I dream for, the one I was trying to help set right. It’s not the America we had during the days of President [John F.] Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. It’s — it’s different.

That's a pretty big leap.

Are you starting to see the issue with Breitbart? This isn't just a one time thing either, they do this constantly. Breitbart is a mess of a site. Even Ben Shapiro highlighted how bad it is back in 2016 saying:

“Andrew Breitbart despised racism. Truly despised it,” former Breitbart editor-at-large Ben Shapiro wrote last week on the Daily Wire, a conservative website. “With Bannon embracing Trump, all that changed. Now Breitbart has become the alt-right go-to website, with [technology editor Milo] Yiannopoulos pushing white ethno-nationalism as a legitimate response to political correctness, and the comment section turning into a cesspool for white supremacist mememakers.”

Breitbart is less accurate than Wikipedia, and that's saying something.

 

[MAGAking1]

The lightweight troll is engaged in deflecting the issue, focused on the stupid gate, and Ngo doxxing. Then he calls me out on spelling (I am on iPhone and on the run) like a TYPICAL weasel Democrat, namecalling and personal attacks, do not address the true issues.

The issue is 300-500 violent rioters threatening a couple's family and home with violence, the rioters had guns, yelled threats, 30 feet from their door, and the rioters have a documented recent and nearby history of extreme violence.

It was broken in to, it was private property, bu fuok the stupid gate issue!

Oh this cant be true because Google has taken me down the wrong road before and Rush carefully edited a video capture
without providing a link to it.

No cant be true because the guy misspelled a word. Cant be true because a video from a reporter of a source(gateway pundit) that I normally would criticize
if it wasnt trying to use it to falsely "prove" a point.

Dude is a hypocrite who hates the country and will keep spreading falsehoods and deflecting.
He has officially entered Troll category in my book after his display of nonsense in this thread.

 

[TomGshotput]

The lightweight troll is engaged in deflecting the issue, focused on the stupid gate, and Ngo doxxing. Then he calls me out on spelling (I am on iPhone and on the run) like a TYPICAL weasel Democrat, namecalling and personal attacks, do not address the true issues.

The issue is 300-500 violent rioters threatening a couple's family and home with violence, the rioters had guns, yelled threats, 30 feet from their door, and the rioters have a documented recent and nearby history of extreme violence.

It was broken in to, it was private property, bu fuok the stupid gate issue!

You are making a perfect example of how Liberals love to claim that personal freedom is a crime and people should use violence to take away our freedoms. Where is the evidence of a riot? Where is the evidence that large amount of people were on their property?

There is evidence that they did pointed weapons at people. As I've said before, do that against the government and it can lead to immediate execution. Now we have Liberals screaming that because they pointed their weapons at American citizens, instead of government officials, it was ok.

 

[HinesWard86]

Why do you keep questioning a still that shows obvious lock damage, why does the whole video matter
But here it is for your consumption
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/l...sters/63-14a1582a-9372-4494-b8ee-41d5d4d71b61

What is your contention other than there was a guy holding a gate with a heavily damaged lock through which
people trespassed.

There is no proof of this. In fact, even in the article you posted says:

"But video from early in the incident shows a man holding open the left side of the gate while the right door is fully intact and upright."

There is no evidence that the lock was damaged beforehand. Come on man, this doesn't even take critical thinking skills.

Here is another video as well that not many have seen.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/multi...deo_549aab77-78a8-550e-9474-8b1a25660e4d.html

Here's an actual quote from that video:

"So while it doesn't appear that the gate was broken when protesters first streamed through the gate on their way to the mayor's house, it does seem likely that the gate was damaged at some point between the time when the protesters came through and when McCloskey took his photos."

I don't know why you are posting stuff that refutes your point, but......thanks?

 

[HinesWard86]

The lightweight troll is engaged in deflecting the issue, focused on the stupid gate, and Ngo doxxing. Then he calls me out on spelling (I am on iPhone and on the run) like a TYPICAL weasel Democrat, namecalling and personal attacks, do not address the true issues.

The issue is 300-500 violent rioters threatening a couple's family and home with violence, the rioters had guns, yelled threats, 30 feet from their door, and the rioters have a documented recent and nearby history of extreme violence.

It was broken in to, it was private property, bu fuok the stupid gate issue!

Are you mad that you contradicted yourself within five minutes and were then proven wrong? You said that 100 percent of doxxings were by left wingers. Then, you changed that to 98 percent and called Andy Ngo "one in a million", when it is clear that doxxing is done on both sides by multiple transgressors.

Not too bright.

 

[HinesWard86]

Wrong about what ? , your the 1 whose making an :bigone: outta yourself :hahahahah

Look back at your posts boo. All you have done is be wrong and post emojis. Smart.

 

[MAGAking1]

Way to move the goalposts. Pretty clear that you got caught posting disingenuous info and are now trying to cover it up. Here's a reminder:

I am hyper critical of media that is truth adverse. Breitbart writes with such a slant that it obfuscates the truth. Take the article that was quoted earlier.

He falsely accused the Tea Party of shouting the “N-word” during a protest against Obamacare in March 2020 - This is a dubious claim at best. Lewis and three other people said it happened, Breitbart said it didn't happen ostensibly because it wasn't on tape. Additionally, this incident happened in 2010 not 2020. Poor editing. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tea-par...ideo-evidence/

Once, he falsely accused Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) of not participating in the civil rights movement. - This is inaccurate. John Lewis' quote was "I never saw him. I never met him", in regards to Bernie Sanders and his involvement in the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Since Lewis was such a prominent figure during that time, it was a jab at how much Bernie was involved, but it was not an abject denial of any involvement.

Lewis also falsely accused President Trump of supporting white supremacists, saying that he cried when Trump said there were “good people on both sides” of protests in Charlottesville, Virginia. (Trump actually condemned the white supremacists “totally.") - There's lots to unpack here. However, what is most interesting is that if you click on the first hyperlink this is the quote they are using to justify that claim:

I don’t think this president has been helpful. I think he feels at home with what is going on. When he reacted to what was happening in Charlottesville, you know, “Good people on both sides,” I cried. It’s not the America that I dream for, the one I was trying to help set right. It’s not the America we had during the days of President [John F.] Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. It’s — it’s different.

That's a pretty big leap.

Are you starting to see the issue with Breitbart? This isn't just a one time thing either, they do this constantly. Breitbart is a mess of a site. Even Ben Shapiro highlighted how bad it is back in 2016 saying:

“Andrew Breitbart despised racism. Truly despised it,” former Breitbart editor-at-large Ben Shapiro wrote last week on the Daily Wire, a conservative website. “With Bannon embracing Trump, all that changed. Now Breitbart has become the alt-right go-to website, with [technology editor Milo] Yiannopoulos pushing white ethno-nationalism as a legitimate response to political correctness, and the comment section turning into a cesspool for white supremacist mememakers.”

Breitbart is less accurate than Wikipedia, and that's saying something.

I dont even know your points from the article, all the shit is running together and is not even germaine to this thread.
I posted an article and you dispute some facts.
Doesnt change anything that you or I feel about this Lewis character, its not like I heard about the guy dying
and just posted the first article about him, I have followed and read about his antics for years.

You will pick a source and claim it is fact no matter what opposing evidence shows
while more than happy to dissect one that disagrees with your point of view.Loser!@#0

I have watched you do this time and time again over the years. YOu are a hypocritical fraud
who masks himself as a reasonable person.

 

[HinesWard86]

They didn't point a gun and the protesters did break the gate.

Did we watch the same news coverage?

Why are you so confident in spouting easily disproven falsehoods?

Please provide proof that the protesters broke the gate.

Even the Fox News headline says that they pointed their weapons at people: https://www.foxnews.com/media/mark-mccloskey-st-louis-prosecutor-guns-tucker-carlson

If you don't trust Fox, similar headlines are in the Wall Street Journal https://www.wsj.com/articles/st-lou...rotesters-charged-with-gun-crimes-11595287467 and the Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...protesters-charged-with-felony-weapons-count/

If you don't trust either, just rewatch the video. You will see it.

Really can't believe you are this dense.

 

[HinesWard86]

I dont even know your points from the article, all the shit is running together and is not even germaine to this thread.
I posted an article and you dispute some facts.
Doesnt change anything that you or I feel about this Lewis character, its not like I heard about the guy dying
and just posted the first article about him, I have followed and read about his antics for years.

You will pick a source and claim it is fact no matter what opposing evidence shows
while more than happy to dissect one that disagrees with your point of view.Loser!@#0

I have watched you do this time and time again over the years. YOu are a hypocritical fraud
who masks himself as a reasonable person.

Incredible stuff. You try to move the goalposts with your argument and then back away once again when you are called out on it.

I have done this time and time again over the years? Really? Please find other examples if I am such a known commodity. You know that I pretty much didn't post anywhere for seven years, right?

 

[HinesWard86]

I dont even know your points from the article, all the shit is running together and is not even germaine to this thread.
I posted an article and you dispute some facts.
Doesnt change anything that you or I feel about this Lewis character, its not like I heard about the guy dying
and just posted the first article about him, I have followed and read about his antics for years.

You will pick a source and claim it is fact no matter what opposing evidence shows
while more than happy to dissect one that disagrees with your point of view.Loser!@#0

I have watched you do this time and time again over the years. YOu are a hypocritical fraud
who masks himself as a reasonable person.

You have yet to disprove any of my points, while I have disproved plenty of yours. Sorry that you can't handle it.