Louisville Is going To Win Tomorrow the kentucky freshman haven't played a road game yet

[mango]

I'm on phucking post review you moron, takes up to an hour to get post out. I'll go whatever ya want, I know a number of folks here that would hold the money, you don't have a chance Tango. Anyone out there got a good idea on how to hold some wagering money? I don't do Bitcoin, but anything else goes. So you tell me, how much you willing to lose?

~T~

Since I kinda have a feeling you might stiff if you lose, I'll make it an amount that you might actually pay. $200 @ +200 for UK under 70 TT. I win, you pay me $400. You win, I pay $200.

Deal?

 

[tmader7]

Testing 1-2-3.

~T~

 

[mango]

1. This UK team is a lot different than previous teams, so comparing previous games to this one should be thrown out the door. Calipari has not had a team that runs like this since John Wall's team. Previous years have been a slower pace.

2. I somewhat agree. I find it hard to watch when an all-american comes here (Killeya-Jones) and sits on the bench but thinks he is the next one and done baller. Calipari is VERY UPFRONT with all these kids though. He does tell them that playing time is not guaranteed and you must earn it. Problem is that the kid sees all these past players going pro that they think he is just saying that. Then when they bring in another player of high caliber, that other player gets upset and wants to transfer because he thought he was the next Towns or Anthony Davis.

I hate the one and done as well, but you have to think, it's not an NCAA rule or a Calipari rule. Most of these coaches are going after the same high profile players. Duke gets a lot of one and done players as well.

You'd have a hard time convincing me that 2014-15 UK team that went 38-0 before losing it's first game is worse than this team. Yet that team was held to 58 by UL. Plus that team wouldn't have lost at home to UCLA like this team.

Just because someone isn't technically breaking the rule doesn't mean they're not sleazeballs. Trump not paying taxes for 20+ years makes him a sleazeball whether he exploited a loophole or not.

 

[tmader7]

Since I kinda have a feeling you might stiff if you lose, I'll make it an amount that you might actually pay. $200 @ +200 for UK under 70 TT. I win, you pay me $400. You win, I pay $200.

Deal?

FIRST, you think I wouldn't pay??? That's just too much. There's a dozen or so folks here that I have their various book acct #'s so I can send them money when we win team parlays. Which gave me a thought....where are you playing? $$ transfer could be acct to acct in which case, I'll take the bet. Get back to me.

~T~

 

[dotcomceo]

and you're completely ignoring malik monk coming off a monster game probably has an ego the size of texas tonight and will think he's michael jordan out there. I see a russell westrbook type 7-22 game from him tonight

 

[jbragg10]

You'd have a hard time convincing me that 2014-15 UK team that went 38-0 before losing it's first game is worse than this team. Yet that team was held to 58 by UL. Plus that team wouldn't have lost at home to UCLA like this team.

Just because someone isn't technically breaking the rule doesn't mean they're not sleazeballs. Trump not paying taxes for 20+ years makes him a sleazeball whether he exploited a loophole or not.

I didnt say they were better. I said they didn't play at the same fast pace that this team plays. I was comparing their style of play to past teams - because you mentioned the PPG in previous matchups. That's all I was saying.

 

[mango]

I bet all cash in Vegas. You can ****** or send MO. Either is fine.

 

[mango]

I didnt say they were better. I said they didn't play at the same fast pace that this team plays. I was comparing their style of play to past teams - because you mentioned the PPG in previous matchups. That's all I was saying.

2014-15 team had 3 games where they scored 110 or more. 17 games where they scored 80+. So it's not like they ran a Princeton offense.

 

[tmader7]

I bet all cash in Vegas. You can ****** or send MO. Either is fine.

LOL, I think I know what ****** is, they send me a dozen emails a day wanting my business. I've sent some MO's to players that don't have accounts.....that being said, I'll back down and give ya a little due, I've got some other fish to fry. GL in your action, watch for our team parlays after the first..............if BAS will get my ass off of post review.

~T~

 

[tmader7]

2014-15 team had 3 games where they scored 110 or more. 17 games where they scored 80+. So it's not like they ran a Princeton offense.

Excuse me, and I did have Monmouth last night, but ya need to re-evaluate Princeton hoops, they scored 90 last night. The day of the Princeton under, and I don't mean the manner in which they shoot free-throws, seems to be on vacation.

~T~

 

[jbragg10]

2014-15 team had 3 games where they scored 110 or more. 17 games where they scored 80+. So it's not like they ran a Princeton offense.

True, but that team was much more efficient. They didn't run anything like this team does. Not saying this team is better because they are clearly not. Just stating the pace is higher with this team.

 

[maddog1987]

Very entertaining thread gents. I think I did get some valuable information reading the entire post. I was looking for an edge because I wanted to bet this game. But I think I have learned enough to just stay away. I think UK wins even giving the current 1 1/2, but I'll follow the expert -- jbragg10.


Thanks for everyone's input -- good and bad.

 

[dotcomceo]

i remember earlier in this thread i said monk would think he was jordan after last game and suck.....he did just that....its sad how boneheaded he is

 

[jbragg10]

I didn't expect Louisville to double their 3pt percentage in this game (and all the missed free throws). Like I said 50/50 game

 

[dotcomceo]

it was never 50/50 the fix was in all day long, vegas bagged you guys who thought otherwise again and i called it. The refs gave so many bad calls to louisville, those refs I mentioned calipari cant seem to beat. LOL at everyone who laughed at me in this thread

 

[mango]

It wasn't the refs. It was UL's suffocating defense. UK didn't even reach 70 until Monk's miracle 28 footer with 10 seconds left.

Like I said, if UL keeps UK in the 60s which they did until 10 sec left, they'd have an excellent chance to win.

 

[dotcomceo]

Louisville's D is overrated, the fact is your guys suck at basketball, kentucky has guys who are great streetballers but how many missed 3s and FT can one team have in a night and hope to win? Im sorry but the difference between good athletes and good ball players are night and day. Stockton and Hornacek were players but not athletes, de'aaron fox is a bonehead of a point guard, he's great like westbrook but man does he have a peanut brain or what? Malik monk took so many bad shots, adebayo cant hit anything but a dunk, im sorry but UK is awful

 

[jbragg10]

^ lol

first true road game and could have easily won that game with a few made free throws at end of the game against a top 10 team after beating a top 10 team on a neutral court and they are trash. ������

I was never laughing at you for the game, I just thought there were better games on the card to bet. It was a close game (like I said it would be). However, I am laughing at you know for saying that UK is trash. Well see in March. This is why I don't post on this board anymore. Too many immature babies who get lucky and start spouting off like they are the shit. I'm out.