the answer to that is you start at one section. i do the dozens, once ive got the dozen patterns i go through the others to identify the most likely number in that dozen..... red/black odd/even 1/2/3 column
its like anything else its practice. 1 table it easy, 6 takes practice but when you spend 12 hours a day in a casino looking for specific things you pick it up fast. (in the casinos where i follow 6 tables Im classified as a "table walker" when you go everyday they know who you are, especially when your not betting like everyone else)
not every table has a pattern, thats what your looking for, when you spot it you have to narrow it down and go from there. at places with one table and no action you are talking waiting a long time.
its like anything else its practice. 1 table it easy, 6 takes practice but when you spend 12 hours a day in a casino looking for specific things you pick it up fast. (in the casinos where i follow 6 tables Im classified as a "table walker" when you go everyday they know who you are, especially when your not betting like everyone else)
not every table has a pattern, thats what your looking for, when you spot it you have to narrow it down and go from there. at places with one table and no action you are talking waiting a long time.
personally I dont mind what anyone else thinks about how I bet horses/dogs/roulette. doesnt bother me.
its like trading in 15 years of doing that ive met 4 people that made money, yet most people claim to be profitable.
nothing i repeat nothing would change wvu's mind on anything because he thinks he knows everything about gambling. Ive seen his type before and if he got away with multiple accounts/ bonus whoring good for him- thats not how i do things
its like trading in 15 years of doing that ive met 4 people that made money, yet most people claim to be profitable.
nothing i repeat nothing would change wvu's mind on anything because he thinks he knows everything about gambling. Ive seen his type before and if he got away with multiple accounts/ bonus whoring good for him- thats not how i do things
you cant compare
taking 40 k off mansion to calculating true odds on a race track/ or a pattern of numbers.
i dont think they made that promotion so one person would walk away with that much of their money
but then again im a fruitcake lol ..... this is all i do everyday is calculate odds so fair enough-- whatever makes you happy.
taking 40 k off mansion to calculating true odds on a race track/ or a pattern of numbers.
i dont think they made that promotion so one person would walk away with that much of their money
but then again im a fruitcake lol ..... this is all i do everyday is calculate odds so fair enough-- whatever makes you happy.
look you still fail to see, that there's a relation to the way event risk is calculated. you simple refuse to think.
you look at a 2.7 negative result and think ok theres absolutely no way for me to change those odds. yet in blackjack you say ok by counting cards and playing strategy you can alter the percentage. its a similar thing.
in relation to the other matter, sure you have openly admitted to taking 40 k from mansion, in a 1 k promotion using multiple accounts and bragging about it.
you look at a 2.7 negative result and think ok theres absolutely no way for me to change those odds. yet in blackjack you say ok by counting cards and playing strategy you can alter the percentage. its a similar thing.
in relation to the other matter, sure you have openly admitted to taking 40 k from mansion, in a 1 k promotion using multiple accounts and bragging about it.
im saying the following
in race 6 at randwick the 5 horse has a 68 % win chance - its current price reads 10-1 its a good bet at that price --- yet it may still lose
in eurusd - for 130 point profit with 37 point risk the chance of that occurring is about 28-29 %
in roulette the number 6 has approximately a 40 % chance of being the next number yet i can get 35-1 - of course there is randomness to numbers there always is in patterns-- its just calculating the probability to bet at a time to maximise the return.
to say that im wrong is not related to the other 7 horses in the race, or the other market participants or the randomness of roulette itself - but if those numbers are accurate then Im betting at my advantage not the casino's
if anyone cant change the odds in their favor and play the game as it stands then you cant win. that has never been in dispute
in race 6 at randwick the 5 horse has a 68 % win chance - its current price reads 10-1 its a good bet at that price --- yet it may still lose
in eurusd - for 130 point profit with 37 point risk the chance of that occurring is about 28-29 %
in roulette the number 6 has approximately a 40 % chance of being the next number yet i can get 35-1 - of course there is randomness to numbers there always is in patterns-- its just calculating the probability to bet at a time to maximise the return.
to say that im wrong is not related to the other 7 horses in the race, or the other market participants or the randomness of roulette itself - but if those numbers are accurate then Im betting at my advantage not the casino's
if anyone cant change the odds in their favor and play the game as it stands then you cant win. that has never been in dispute
i dont bet sports that much anymore
but i follow memphis closely and wrote in one of the threads i thought they were a good play and my money was on them
that was my opinion and was providing my input from watching so many games that others may not have seen. I felt i had an edge over most people on that game.
of course the result could have been either side - but does that mean dont bet ? no i went with my judgement.
but i follow memphis closely and wrote in one of the threads i thought they were a good play and my money was on them
that was my opinion and was providing my input from watching so many games that others may not have seen. I felt i had an edge over most people on that game.
of course the result could have been either side - but does that mean dont bet ? no i went with my judgement.
