Just curious why your panties aren't all wadded up into your vagina over all this other cheating going on. Patriots aren't even in the top 20 cheaters.
http://yourteamcheats.com/cheaters/
Just curious why your panties aren't all wadded up into your vagina over all this other cheating going on. Patriots aren't even in the top 20 cheaters.
http://yourteamcheats.com/cheaters/
LMAO REALLY!?!?! A site created after deflategate by Pats fans, you really expect to find unbiased information? While your at it check out a film by Goebbels, I'm sure it's filled with useful information!
http://www.milehighreport.com/2015/5/9/8577091/the-truth-behind
http://www.scout.com/nfl/broncos/st...scandal-the-denver-broncos-salary-cap-scandal
See I also could provide homer-based links to defend/promote a viewpoint! Here's a tip, use an objective site, one recognized by most people. I'll spell it out for you...
wikipedia sports scandals and let me know what you find.
http://www.milehighreport.com/2015/5/9/8577091/the-truth-behind
http://www.scout.com/nfl/broncos/st...scandal-the-denver-broncos-salary-cap-scandal
See I also could provide homer-based links to defend/promote a viewpoint! Here's a tip, use an objective site, one recognized by most people. I'll spell it out for you...
wikipedia sports scandals and let me know what you find.
Um, sorry you can't get out of it so easy by your ad hominem logical fallacy.
Every cheating event is documented on that site:
[h=3]A PLEDGE TO YOU FROM THE COMMISH[/h]1. AUTHENTICITY: Every cheat listed on this site was published by a third party somewhere in the media, no cheats have been created solely for this site. You can challenge the rating and commentary, but you can't challenge the cheat.
2. VERIFIABILITY: A cheat will never be posted on this site without a link to at least one of these sources.
3. FACTUALITY: A cheat is only included if it exceeds the "more probable than not" doctrine established by the NFL. Severity rankings are Your Team Cheats* editorial decisions and are based upon the facts of the cheat.
4. PEER STANDARDS: We will strive to exhibit as much attention to detail, fact and fairness as fans and professional media exhibited in their coverage of signature NFL cheats like Spygate, Bountygate, and Deflategate.
Now, answer my question or STFU. Why aren't your panties wadded up into your vagina about all those other cheating events?
So Pats under Belicheat, middle of the pack in fumbles, during their Lance Armstronging of Super Bowls. (logic tell you should have been better during their run) 2005 physics of Football published, clearly states slightly under inflated balls easier to grip...etc...etc...Belicheat forwarded the book. Next year Brady lobbies NFL for teams to supply their own ball. After 2006 historic run of lack of fumbles for an outdoor northern team (even greater if you look at fumbles per touch)...culminating in the Colts game where they were actually caught, balls were deflated! Kraft's own buddy, must take action against the team and the NFL's golden boy, meal ticket, married to a supermodel Tom Brady. This is what you call circumstantial evidence in a nutshell. (spygate also an aggravating factor) If you're looking for a smoking gun, a lot of cases reach conviction without a smoking gun!
lol, that is funny. A bit of a tangent ....
Lance Armstrong won the Tour de France SEVEN straight times. Astounding achievement........... ..................can he be regarded as sport's ultimate cheat? He declared he was innocent for so long; did he actually convince himself he was innocent? created meaning
“We’re sick and tired of these allegations and we’re going to do everything we can to fight them. They’re absolutely untrue” – news conference, 2004.
“How many times do I have to say it? … Well, if it can’t be any clearer than ‘I’ve never taken drugs,'” – videotaped testimony in lawsuit, 2005.
“I came out of a life-threatening disease. I was on my death bed. You think I’m going to come back into a sport and say, ‘OK, OK doctor, give me everything you’ve got, I just want to go fast?’ No way! I would never do that,” – public forum, Aspen, Colo., 2007.
“You are not worth the chair that you’re sitting on,” – at journalist and doping critic Paul Kimmage, at 2009 news conference.
when the evidence is overwhelming Mr Armstrong comes clean and says this;
“Do we make mistakes, all of us? Absolutely. As a society, are we supposed to forgive and forget and let people get back to their job? Absolutely,” – same news conference, arguing that dopers should get a second chance.
yes. You are forgiven. Sleep well. Your titles are gone.
Do you remember how guilty those Duke LaCross Players were? There were even eyewitnesses. If I remember correctly, that skunk Al Sharpton and/or that other skunk Gloria Allred declared those white young men of privilege guilty.
Imagine if Fuhrer Goodell had an eyewitness.....
This response shows that you're really not interested in the truth. That site has documentation from third party sources
for all of the infractions. So, that being said, I'm done with you, you clearly have an agenda, and you're not
interested in facts.
The third party documentation is not *subjective* it's *objective*. I'm wondering if you even realize how stupid your statement is.
[QUOTEJust curious why your panties aren't all wadded up into your vagina over all this other cheating going on. Patriots aren't even in the top 20 cheaters.
http://yourteamcheats.com/cheaters/
][/QUOTE]
LMAO...thank you
-Jeffery Dahmer
http://yourteamcheats.com/cheaters/
][/QUOTE]
LMAO...thank you
-Jeffery Dahmer
