Look at all those fumbles by the Pats since all that air was put back in the balls.

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,865
Tokens
This response shows that you're really not interested in the truth. That site has documentation from third party sources
for all of the infractions. So, that being said, I'm done with you, you clearly have an agenda, and you're not
interested in facts.

The third party documentation is not *subjective* it's *objective*. I'm wondering if you even realize how stupid your statement is.


Please stop with the insults, they mean nothing online! Say it to a person's face if you may. Their rankings of "cheating" is purely subjective. Please look up the meanings of the said words before commenting.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,865
Tokens
Do you remember how guilty those Duke LaCross Players were? There were even eyewitnesses. If I remember correctly, that skunk Al Sharpton and/or that other skunk Gloria Allred declared those white young men of privilege guilty.

Imagine if Fuhrer Goodell had an eyewitness.....

Eyewitnesses are the least reliable source of evidence! And the circumstantial evidence proved they were not guilty.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,573,035
Members
100,866
Latest member
tt88myy
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com