liars

[SheriffJoe]

You can take your KkK bullshit and put that squarely on the south and southern democrats and ideals, those ideals are not the same now. I don't like people who think they are entitled either. Programs were started for the right reason but have taken on a whole new agenda. Welfare, EPA, PETA, even the NRA etc are needed organizations but they all have gone over the top.

Your thinking that liberals are all the same way is absurd and you want to talk about stupidity of a voting base...., what did Trump say about the republican voting base years ago? That's right he called them stupid and hinted that they were gullible.
I'm waiting for a good republican to come to the scene who isn't an absolute joke. Give us a plan, have a platform. The Republican Party disappoints me with the candidates they have had past 20 years or so. Can't they do better? Now we are going to be stuck with Hillary because of a failed Republican Party

Uhhh, no they weren't!

Just like JDeuce said, your liberty-destroying socialist ideology is evil...pure fucking evil. Not to mention totally anti-American.

And any conservative who refuses to call a spade a spade by giving liberals the benefit the doubt that "they mean well" is part of the problem rather than the solution.

Your ideology isn't "compassion," it's theft.

 

[BleedingPurple]

Uhhh, no they weren't!

Just like JDeuce said, your liberty-destroying socialist ideology is evil...pure fucking evil. Not to mention totally anti-American.

And any conservative who refuses to call a spade a spade by giving liberals the benefit the doubt that "they mean well" is part of the problem rather than the solution.

Your ideology isn't "compassion," it's theft.

You are full of shit

 

[BleedingPurple]

what we know about Republicans

1) they make more money (income exit polls)
2) they own more businesses
3) they're more likely to be married and raise their kids together
4) they give more time, more money and more blood to charitable organizations


but because Democrats control the message, we're called racist, selfish, homophobic and women haters

I would say most homophobic and racist people I know are republicans, some
Republican officials think gays should receive treatment, it's hard to back that kind of thinking. Also some want to eliminate planned
Parenthood and the current republican candidate was spewin something about women having abortions should be punished?

What you wrote is what the republican base should build itself around, should be their platform. Don't open their mouths about social issues and they would
Have a fighting chance

 

[SheriffJoe]

You are full of shit

Awesome reply. k:

You do realize previous generations died for everything your evil ideology is trying to destroy, right?

Take away the checks and balances (well, what's left of them) of the American republic and the Dinocraps would "fundamentally transform" the USA into Venezuela.

 

[JDeuce]

You can take your KkK bullshit and put that squarely on the south and southern democrats and ideals, those ideals are not the same now.

Oh, right. IIRC, you were the one on here touting the "big switch" that allegedly happened in the 1960s where R's and D's somehow switched sides while nobody was looking. Even though you still can't cite any names, dates or legislation that would support your wishful thinking. Let's just add that to the "you really have to believe bullshit this stupid to be a dimocrap" list. As I pointed out, Robert Byrd ran as a D and was sent to the Senate as recently as the 2000s. Are you really suggesting their ideals are "not the same now?" What, the 2000s is ancient history?

As for Trump, are you talking about this quote that he never actually said, but you ran with because it felt good?

http://www.rgj.com/story/news/2015/12/10/fact-check-did-trump-say-98-republicans-dumb/77099822/

Q:
Did Donald Trump tell People magazine in 1998 that if he ever ran for president, he’d do it as a Republican because “they’re the dumbest group of voters in the country” and that he “could lie and they’d still eat it up”?
A: No, that’s a bogus meme.
FULL ANSWER
The meme purports to be a quote from Trump in People magazine in 1998 saying, “If I were to run, I’d run as a Republican. They’re the dumbest group of voters in the country. They believe anything on Fox News. I could lie and they’d still eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific.”
We were alerted to the meme by a reader, A. Douglas Thomas of Freeport, N.Y., among others, who saw it in his Facebook feed, along with a message from someone who said, “I just fact-checked this. Google Donald Trump, People magazine and 1998. This is an actual quote by Trump.”
We’ll save you the effort. It is not an actual quote by Trump.
We scoured the People magazine archives and found nothing like this quote in 1998 or any other year.

Despite Ted Koppel's pleas the other day for the public to keep buying the media's bullshit lies, the Internet has changed the game. I think a lot more people are seeing the curtain get pulled back on the lies of the dimocrap platform. Doesn't sound like you're ready to recognize that for yourself yet...

 

[JDeuce]

You are full of shit

Wow. Great answer!

Translation: Joe just checkmated me, and I have no real response...so he's just a big meanie!

Why don't you play the race card, Purple? It's about all your have left after getting scorched in this thread.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Yes! Please oh please play the race card!

 

[BleedingPurple]

You are full of shit

welfare was started for the right reason, it was used to help families with children, exclusively single or widowed mothers, PETA definitely necessary too, EPA as well. I think that's fairly easy to
Figure out.

 

[BleedingPurple]

You are full of shit

Oh, right. IIRC, you were the one on here touting the "big switch" that allegedly happened in the 1960s where R's and D's somehow switched sides while nobody was looking. Even though you still can't cite any names, dates or legislation that would support your wishful thinking. Let's just add that to the "you really have to believe bullshit this stupid to be a dimocrap" list. As I pointed out, Robert Byrd ran as a D and was sent to the Senate as recently as the 2000s. Are you really suggesting their ideals are "not the same now?" What, the 2000s is ancient history?

As for Trump, are you talking about this quote that he never actually said, but you ran with because it felt good?

http://www.rgj.com/story/news/2015/12/10/fact-check-did-trump-say-98-republicans-dumb/77099822/

Q:
Did Donald Trump tell People magazine in 1998 that if he ever ran for president, he’d do it as a Republican because “they’re the dumbest group of voters in the country” and that he “could lie and they’d still eat it up”?
A: No, that’s a bogus meme.
FULL ANSWER
The meme purports to be a quote from Trump in People magazine in 1998 saying, “If I were to run, I’d run as a Republican. They’re the dumbest group of voters in the country. They believe anything on Fox News. I could lie and they’d still eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific.”
We were alerted to the meme by a reader, A. Douglas Thomas of Freeport, N.Y., among others, who saw it in his Facebook feed, along with a message from someone who said, “I just fact-checked this. Google Donald Trump, People magazine and 1998. This is an actual quote by Trump.”
We’ll save you the effort. It is not an actual quote by Trump.
We scoured the People magazine archives and found nothing like this quote in 1998 or any other year.

Despite Ted Koppel's pleas the other day for the public to keep buying the media's bullshit lies, the Internet has changed the game. I think a lot more people are seeing the curtain get pulled back on the lies of the dimocrap platform. Doesn't sound like you're ready to recognize that for yourself yet...

Good point on the Trump situation got that wrong. Are you saying that the Republican Party was always the Conservative party and democrats was always the liberal party? I've asked you that before?

 

[BleedingPurple]

Wow. Great answer!

Translation: Joe just checkmated me, and I have no real response...so he's just a big meanie!

Why don't you play the race card, Purple? It's about all your have left after getting scorched in this thread.

Yeah I'm getting scorched cause you say so, I guess welfare, peta, and epa weren't needed, who knew? I guess the southern democrats were all liberal, big government guys and the northern republican's were right winged conservatives.

 

[SheriffJoe]

welfare was started for the right reason, it was used to help families with children, exclusively single or widowed mothers, PETA definitely necessary too, EPA as well. I think that's fairly easy to
Figure out.

Maybe those "single mothers" should have acted more responsibly and kept their legs closed until they could afford children instead of begging Sugar Daddy Government (now available for ILLEGALS! uke1 to bail them out of their mistakes.

I guess this is the meaning of your socialist party's "shared responsibility" motto, while anyone who disagrees with this failed nonsense is labeled "selfish" for "not paying their fair share." Obviously, you have absolutely no understanding of moral hazard.

Also, no mention of the words "EPA" and "PETA" in the Constitution which means those tyrannical agencies are - GASP! - illegal.

But hey, with dinocraps, the ends always justify the means, so what difference does it make?

 

[vitterd]

Maybe those "single mothers" should have acted more responsibly and kept their legs closed until they could afford children instead of begging Sugar Daddy Government (now available for ILLEGALS! uke1 to bail them out of their mistakes and care for them.

I guess this is the meaning of your socialist party's "shared responsibility" motto, while anyone who disagrees with this failed nonsense is labeled "selfish" for "not paying their fair share"

Also, no mention of the words "EPA" and "PETA" in the Constitution which means those tyrannical agencies are - GASP! - illegal.

But hey, with dinocraps, the ends always justify the means, so what difference does it make?

Joe hatred towards women is showing again. All because woman keep their legs closed when he walks in the room.

 

[SheriffJoe]

 

[BleedingPurple]

Maybe those "single mothers" should have acted more responsibly and kept their legs closed until they could afford children instead of begging Sugar Daddy Government (now available for ILLEGALS! uke1 to bail them out of their mistakes.

I guess this is the meaning of your socialist party's "shared responsibility" motto, while anyone who disagrees with this failed nonsense is labeled "selfish" for "not paying their fair share." Obviously, you have absolutely no understanding of moral hazard.

Also, no mention of the words "EPA" and "PETA" in the Constitution which means those tyrannical agencies are - GASP! - illegal.

But hey, with dinocraps, the ends always justify the means, so what difference does it make?

Well they had no clue there would
Be a Great Depression the benefits were meant for the poor children who were fatherless.

Without PETA how many more animal species would be extinct? If it wasn't for groups like this and DNR there wouldn't be any animals left.

Without EPA there would be far less habitat for such animals.

So if it wasn't in the original constitution it's illegal.

You sir are a disgrace, keep on the internet fight behind the keyboard. Bet you have never stopped to help anyone in their life. Glad people like you are becoming less and less

 

[The Guesser]

Well they had no clue there would
Be a Great Depression the benefits were meant for the poor children who were fatherless.

Without PETA how many more animal species would be extinct? If it wasn't for groups like this and DNR there wouldn't be any animals left.

Without EPA there would be far less habitat for such animals.

So if it wasn't in the original constitution it's illegal.

You sir are a disgrace, keep on the internet fight behind the keyboard. Bet you have never stopped to help anyone in their life. Glad people like you are becoming less and less

 

[JDeuce]

Well they had no clue there would
Be a Great Depression the benefits were meant for the poor children who were fatherless.

Without PETA how many more animal species would be extinct? If it wasn't for groups like this and DNR there wouldn't be any animals left.

Without EPA there would be far less habitat for such animals.

So if it wasn't in the original constitution it's illegal.

You sir are a disgrace, keep on the internet fight behind the keyboard. Bet you have never stopped to help anyone in their life. Glad people like you are becoming less and less

1. Depression or not, the government's role is not to function as society's safety net. I know it's tough for you to wrap your head around that one since you seem to have been raised to believe government is the answer instead of the problem.

2. Since when is PETA a government agency?

3. As for the Constitutionality of programs like the EPA, please cite for me where in the constitution the government has the authority to regulate the environment. Or better yet, just admit you've never read the damn thing and I'll explain to you where your thought process is breaking down.

 

[BleedingPurple]

1. Depression or not, the government's role is not to function as society's safety net. I know it's tough for you to wrap your head around that one since you seem to have been raised to believe government is the answer instead of the problem.

2. Since when is PETA a government agency?

3. As for the Constitutionality of programs like the EPA, please cite for me where in the constitution the government has the authority to regulate the environment. Or better yet, just admit you've never read the damn thing and I'll explain to you where your thought process is breaking down.

1. I have never said that Government was the "ANSWER." Welfare was and is needed in this country not to the degree it is now but it definitely was needed.
2. PETA is not a government agency but they have got funding and government grants. PETA was a great organization but has turned into some sort of radical cult for animals
3. My thought process isn't breaking down, you think everything that is done needs to be in the constitution? You don't think the EPA was needed?
4. I am waiting for your response on Southern Democrats? I'm talking about the dudes back in the day who were pro slavery? Were they liberal big government guys or were they right wing conservatives? How about the northern Republicans? Were they right wing conservatives or were they liberal?

 

[SheriffJoe]

JDeuce: Cite the clause in the Constitution that allows the federal government to regulate the environment?

BleepingPurple: d-d-d-d-d-duhhhhhhhh...c'mon man, the EPA was like totally necessary and does a great job!

We need a cure...FAST! :neenee:

 

[BleedingPurple]

JDeuce: Cite the clause in the Constitution that allows the federal government to regulate the environment?

BleepingPurple: d-d-d-d-d-duhhhhhhhh...c'mon man, the EPA was like totally necessary and does a great job!

We need a cure...FAST! :neenee:

EPA Was necessary, I do think they are a bit extreme. The Constitution is over 200 years old, the forefathers couldn't have envisioned that man was going to try and deplete the environment. Someone had to regulate it.

 

[SheriffJoe]

EPA Was necessary, I do think they are a bit extreme. The Constitution is over 200 years old, the forefathers couldn't have envisioned that man was going to try and deplete the environment. Someone had to regulate it.

First of all, there is an orderly legal amendment process (as opposed to the left's current chaotic divisive illegal "we won the election!" approach) so "the Constitution is over 200 years old" is a tired weak left wing non-sequitur.

And secondly, why can't the individual states regulate their own environment? Again, cite the clause in the Constitution which gives the federal government the legal authority to regulate every puddle in the country?

"President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency currently stands poised to strike the greatest blow to private property rights the modern era has seen, through a proposed rule that radically expands EPA jurisdiction by placing virtually all land and water under the heavy regulatory hand of the federal government."

http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/234685-epa-water-rule-is-blow-to-americans-private-property-rights

Even if your arguments had merit (they don't), just because something "sounds good" doesn't give you legal authority to impose your Utopia on free law-abiding citizens! face)(*^%

PS - Shocker:

Analysis: EPA Data Shows Air In Red States Is 10% Cleaner Than In Blue States

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/03/a...10-cleaner-than-in-blue-states/#ixzz4DdTVprn0